Abstract
An Integrated Pest management for Pink Bollworm (PBW) in Cotton includes installing PBW pheromone traps (5acre-1) after 45 DAS, release of T. bactrae @ 60000acre-1 thrice at weekly intervals between 60-90 DAS, spray of Quinalphos 20 EC 2mllitre-1of water if 10% infested bolls with live larvae observed, were evaluated against PBW in Scarce rainfall zone of Anantapur district of Andhra Pradesh during Kharif March to September for three years (2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22). Observations on % Rosette flower and Locule damage was noted based on total number and damaged fruiting bodies in each plant taken from 10 IPM and 10 farmer's practice (FP) fields and results show IPM fields registered significantly less rosette flower damage compared to FP indicating the suitability of IPM components. Rosette flower damage was found lower of 5.23%, 3.07% and 3.48% with a mean of 3.92% in IPM as compared to FP (16.77%, 5.81% and 8.43%) with mean of 10.33, similarly, Locule damage of 7.07%, 2.48%, 3.95% with a mean of 4.50% in IPM as compared to 12.14%, 6.48% and 6.71% with a mean of 8.52% in FP during 2018–19, 2019–20, and 2020–21, respectively. The benefit-cost ratio shows that IPM practice gives more benefit, i.e. 2.58, 2.54, and 1.80, with mean of 2.30 compared to FP, 2.10, 2.27, and 1.50 with mean of 1.95 respectively, during 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22, respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
IPM significantly reduced rosette flower damage versus farmer practice.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutume1 - Treatment
- IPMe0
- Interactor
- Pink Bollworm
Pectinophora gossypiellae1pest - Outcome
- rosette flower damagee0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Comparator
- FPe0
- Setting
- Scarce rainfall zone of Anantapur district of Andhra Pradeshe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“IPM fields registered significantly less rosette flower damage compared to FP”
e1“Pink Bollworm (PBW) in Cotton”
e2“Scarce rainfall zone of Anantapur district of Andhra Pradesh”
Claim · model-written summary
Mean rosette flower damage was 3.92% under IPM versus 10.33 under farmer practice.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- IPMe0
- Interactor
- Pink BollwormPectinophora gossypiellae1pest
- Outcome
- Rosette flower damagee0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 3.92%e0
- Qualifier
- mean of 10.33e0
- Comparator
- FPe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Rosette flower damage was found lower of 5.23%, 3.07% and 3.48% with a mean of 3.92% in IPM as compared to FP (16.77%, 5.81% and 8.43%) with mean of 10.33”
e1“Pink Bollworm (PBW) in Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Mean locule damage was 4.50% under IPM versus 8.52% under farmer practice.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- IPMe0
- Interactor
- Pink BollwormPectinophora gossypiellae1pest
- Outcome
- Locule damagee0
- Direction
- lowere2
- Value
- 4.50%e0
- Qualifier
- mean of 8.52%e0
- Comparator
- FPe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Locule damage of 7.07%, 2.48%, 3.95% with a mean of 4.50% in IPM as compared to 12.14%, 6.48% and 6.71% with a mean of 8.52% in FP”
e1“Pink Bollworm (PBW) in Cotton”
e2“Rosette flower damage was found lower”
Claim · model-written summary
Mean benefit-cost ratio was 2.30 with IPM versus 1.95 with farmer practice.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- IPMe0
- Interactor
- Pink BollwormPectinophora gossypiellae1pest
- Outcome
- benefite0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 2.30e0
- Qualifier
- mean of 1.95e0
- Comparator
- FPe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“IPM practice gives more benefit, i.e. 2.58, 2.54, and 1.80, with mean of 2.30 compared to FP, 2.10, 2.27, and 1.50 with mean of 1.95”
e1“Pink Bollworm (PBW) in Cotton”
The same questions in other papers
ipm · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.