Abstract
In Nagarkurnool district of Telangana state the Cotton crop is being cultivated in 1,19,059 ha mainly in shallow soils which are poor in fertility as well as water holding capacity. The farmers don’t have the sufficient knowledge on IPM components to manage the pests and diseases in Cotton crop. To overcome these problems KVK, Palem has been organized Front line demonstration on promotion of IPM in Bt cotton in 10 locations every year from three years i.e. 2016-2018. Regular monitoring, Seed treatment with Pseudomonas fluorescence @ 30g/kg seed, stem application by using rolling stem applicators with monocrotophos 36% SL @ 1: 4 ratio at 30, 60 and 70 days intervals and installation of yellow sticky traps was reduced the incidence of sucking pest complex up to 25-30%, erecting of pheromone traps 8/acre at flowering to square formation stage, bird perches @ 20/acre, Spraying of Azadiractin 1500ppm @ 5ml/litre of water at boll formation stage and need based spraying of insecticides the incidence of Pink bollworm (PBW) is below the ETL up to first picking, but after the first picking due to prolonged dry spells, poor plant vigour the PBW flared up. The results revealed that in frontline demonstration on IPM in cotton an average three year yield recorded was 20.38 q/ha as compared to the farmer’s practice which was 18.33q/ha with the average benefit cost ratios are 1:1.33 and 1:1.09 and with net returns of 24,691/- compare to farmer practice 7682/- respectively. However, with the IPM module five pesticidal sprays were reduced by saving an amount of 6000/-.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
IPM reduced sucking-pest incidence by 25-30%.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- Seed treatment with Pseudomonas fluorescence @ 30g/kg seede0
- Interactor
- sucking pest complexe0pest
- Outcome
- incidence of sucking pest complexe0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 25-30%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Regular monitoring, Seed treatment with Pseudomonas fluorescence @ 30g/kg seed, stem application by using rolling stem applicators with monocrotophos 36% SL @ 1: 4 ratio at 30, 60 and 70 days intervals and installation of yellow sticky traps was reduced the incidence of sucking pest complex up to 25-30%”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Pink bollworm incidence stayed below ETL until first picking under IPM.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- IPMe1
- Interactor
- Pink bollworm
Pectinophora gossypiellae0pest - Outcome
- incidence of Pink bollworm (PBW)e0
- Direction
- belowe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the incidence of Pink bollworm (PBW) is below the ETL up to first picking”
t0“Cotton”
e1“with the IPM module five pesticidal sprays were reduced”
Claim · model-written summary
Pink bollworm increased after first picking during dry spells and poor plant vigour.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Interactor
- PBWe0pest
- Outcome
- PBWe0
- Direction
- flared upe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“after the first picking due to prolonged dry spells, poor plant vigour the PBW flared up”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
IPM demonstration yield averaged 20.38 q/ha over three years versus 18.33q/ha for farmer practice.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- IPMe1
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Value
- 20.38 q/hae0
- Comparator
- farmer’s practicee0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“an average three year yield recorded was 20.38 q/ha as compared to the farmer’s practice which was 18.33q/ha”
t0“cotton”
e1“with the IPM module five pesticidal sprays were reduced”
Claim · model-written summary
The IPM benefit-cost ratio was 1:1.33 versus 1:1.09 for farmer practice.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratiose0
- Value
- 1:1.33e0
Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“average benefit cost ratios are 1:1.33 and 1:1.09”
t0“cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
IPM net returns were 24,691/- versus 7682/- for farmer practice.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Value
- 24,691/-e0
- Comparator
- farmer practicee0
Not reportedTreatmentDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“net returns of 24,691/- compare to farmer practice 7682/- respectively”
t0“cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
The IPM module reduced pesticidal sprays by five.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- IPM modulee0
- Outcome
- pesticidal sprayse0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with the IPM module five pesticidal sprays were reduced”
t0“cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
The reduction in sprays saved 6000/-.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Outcome
- saving an amounte0
- Value
- 6000/-e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“by saving an amount of 6000/-”
t0“cotton”
The same questions in other papers
ipm · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →seed treatment · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
18 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →ipm · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
38 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.