Paper · 2023 · Ecology Environment and Conservation

Effect of microbial inoculated crop residue recycling on soil properties and field pea yield

Reshma Shinde; Dhirendra Kumar Shahi; Prabhakar Mahapatra; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to study the effects of crop residue (CR) recycling and microbial culture application on the yield and nutrient uptake in field pea crop. The experiments were designed in factorial RBD with 15 treatments consisting of three crop residues and five microbial treatments to crop residue having two replications each. Application of paddy straw @ 5.0 t/ha and inoculating Trichoderma viridi with 1% nitrogen increased the crop yield by 11.75% over the control, enhanced the total nutrient uptake, and improved the soil’s properties. Thus, crop residue application with microbial inoculation and nitrogen supplementation can be an effective in situ residue management approach in field pea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paddy straw with Trichoderma viridi and nitrogen raised field pea yield by 11.75% relative to control.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
paddy straw @ 5.0 t/ha and inoculating Trichoderma viridi with 1% nitrogene0
Interactor
Trichoderma viridie0symbiont
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.75%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of paddy straw @ 5.0 t/ha and inoculating Trichoderma viridi with 1% nitrogen increased the crop yield by 11.75% over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–482 · show in text ↑
t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same residue and inoculation treatment enhanced total nutrient uptake in field pea.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
paddy straw @ 5.0 t/ha and inoculating Trichoderma viridi with 1% nitrogene0
Interactor
Trichoderma viridie0symbiont
Outcome
total nutrient uptakee0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of paddy straw @ 5.0 t/ha and inoculating Trichoderma viridi with 1% nitrogen increased the crop yield by 11.75% over the control, enhanced the total nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same residue and inoculation treatment improved soil properties.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
paddy straw @ 5.0 t/ha and inoculating Trichoderma viridi with 1% nitrogene0
Interactor
Trichoderma viridie0symbiont
Outcome
soil’s propertiese0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of paddy straw @ 5.0 t/ha and inoculating Trichoderma viridi with 1% nitrogen increased the crop yield by 11.75% over the control, enhanced the total nutrient uptake, and improved the soil’s properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–554 · show in text ↑
t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–86 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors propose residue application with microbial inoculation and nitrogen as field pea residue management.

Taxon
field peae0
Outcome
crop residue application with microbial inoculation and nitrogen supplementatione0

Verbatim

e0

“crop residue application with microbial inoculation and nitrogen supplementation can be an effective in situ residue management approach in field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–711 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

76 papers: 59 positive, 17 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

inoculation · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

127 papers: 108 positive, 19 negative or no effect

107 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 37 positive, 3 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.