Paper · 2024 · Italian Journal of Agrometeorology

Does drip irrigation contribute to the economic sustainability of soybean production?

Arianna Toffanin; Carmelo Maucieri; Giampaolo Rossi; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A two-year (2020, 2022) field experiment on soybean was conducted in northeaster Italy to evaluate the effect of irrigation (drip irrigation vs. rainfed), soil amendment (compost vs. digestate) and a cover crop (triticale vs. no cover crop) on grain yield and quality. Highly different rainfall amounts (627 mm and 258 mm in 2020 and 2022, respectively) and similar ET0 (578 mm and 581 mm in 2020 and 2022, respectively) were recorded during the growing seasons. Irrigation was managed using the web platform Irriframe suppling 51 mm in 2020 and 157 mm in 2022. Irrigation was the only experimental factor with significant effects on soybean grain yield and quality, except soil amendment on aboveground biomass production. In 2020, drip irrigation had no significant effect on grain yield (4.6 Mg ha-1 on average), while it increased it by 157% in 2022 compared to the rainfed control (1.0 Mg ha-1). The grain protein content was reduced by irrigation (43.2 ± 1.3% and 42.6 ± 0.9% under rainfed and irrigation managements, respectively). No treatment effect was observed on the grain oil content. A positive effect of irrigation was observed on water use efficiency, with values ranging from 0.40 ± 0.19 kg m-3 to 0.71 ± 0.12 kg m-3. The balance of the economic sustainability of drip irrigation was negative in both years: this irrigation method was not sustainable for soybean within the economic framework of the study area at the time. However, the results also confirmed that irrigation is a key agronomic technique to reduce production variability and dryland vulnerability of soybean.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation significantly affected soybean grain yield and quality.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
grain yield and qualitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation was the only experimental factor with significant effects on soybean grain yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–665 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil amendment affected aboveground biomass production.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
soil amendmente0
Outcome
aboveground biomass productione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“except soil amendment on aboveground biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–722 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2020 drip irrigation did not significantly alter grain yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
drip irrigatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
no significant effecte0
Value
4.6 Mg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2020, drip irrigation had no significant effect on grain yield (4.6 Mg ha-1 on average)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2022 drip irrigation increased grain yield 157% over rainfed control.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
drip irrigatione1
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
increasede0
Value
157%e0
Comparator
rainfed controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while it increased it by 157% in 2022 compared to the rainfed control (1.0 Mg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“In 2020, drip irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–748 · show in text ↑
e2

“no significant effect on grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–789 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation reduced grain protein content.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
grain protein contente0
Direction
reducede0
Value
42.6 ± 0.9%e0
Qualifier
43.2 ± 1.3%e0
Comparator
rainfede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain protein content was reduced by irrigation (43.2 ± 1.3% and 42.6 ± 0.9% under rainfed and irrigation managements, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments did not affect grain oil content.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
treatmente0
Outcome
grain oil contente0
Direction
No treatment effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No treatment effect was observed on the grain oil content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation improved water use efficiency.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
positive effecte0
Value
0.40 ± 0.19 kg m-3 to 0.71 ± 0.12 kg m-3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A positive effect of irrigation was observed on water use efficiency, with values ranging from 0.40 ± 0.19 kg m-3 to 0.71 ± 0.12 kg m-3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation had a negative economic balance in both years.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
drip irrigatione0
Outcome
balance of the economic sustainabilitye0
Direction
negativee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The balance of the economic sustainability of drip irrigation was negative in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–73 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: protein · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

26 papers: 17 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 61 positive, 8 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

irrigation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 264 positive, 79 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

339 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.