Abstract
The aloe vera based natural coatings can improve the quality and lengthen the shelf life of fruits and vegetables. In this study, the effect of mixtures of Aloe vera gel, pectin and olive oil on the improvement of quality and shelf life extension of six different cultivars of mango (Gopalbhog, Ranipochand, Khirsapat, Langra, Fazli and Aswina) have investigated. The coating of fruits (coating treated fruit) was found significantly delay the ripening process and softening of the fruit. The shelf life of coated fruits increased to 4 to 6 days compared to that of uncoated fruits. Average weight loss was 5-7% less in coated fruits compared to uncoated ones. The coated fruits showed less gene expression than uncoated one. All the above information of different mango cultivars showed variation in quality parameters. Bangladesh J. Nutr. Vol. 32, December 2019, P: 45-55
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
The aloe vera based coating significantly delayed ripening and softening of mango fruit compared with uncoated fruit.
- Taxon
- mango
_from_India.jpg?width=60)
Mangifera indicae0 - Treatment
- Aloe vera gel, pectin and olive oile1
- Outcome
- ripening process and softeninge2
- Direction
- significantly delaye2
- Comparator
- uncoated fruitse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“six different cultivars of mango (Gopalbhog, Ranipochand, Khirsapat, Langra, Fazli and Aswina)”
e1“mixtures of Aloe vera gel, pectin and olive oil”
e2“The coating of fruits (coating treated fruit) was found significantly delay the ripening process and softening of the fruit”
e3“The shelf life of coated fruits increased to 4 to 6 days compared to that of uncoated fruits”
Claim · model-written summary
Coated mango fruit shelf life increased to 4 to 6 days compared with uncoated fruit.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- coatinge2
- Outcome
- shelf lifee3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Value
- 4 to 6 dayse3
- Comparator
- uncoated fruitse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“six different cultivars of mango (Gopalbhog, Ranipochand, Khirsapat, Langra, Fazli and Aswina)”
e2“The coating of fruits (coating treated fruit) was found significantly delay the ripening process and softening of the fruit”
e3“The shelf life of coated fruits increased to 4 to 6 days compared to that of uncoated fruits”
Claim · model-written summary
Average weight loss of coated mango fruit was 5-7% less than that of uncoated fruit.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- coated fruitse4
- Outcome
- weight losse4
- Direction
- lesse4
- Value
- 5-7%e4
- Comparator
- uncoated onese4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“six different cultivars of mango (Gopalbhog, Ranipochand, Khirsapat, Langra, Fazli and Aswina)”
e4“Average weight loss was 5-7% less in coated fruits compared to uncoated ones”
Claim · model-written summary
Coated mango fruit showed less gene expression than uncoated fruit.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- coated fruitse5
- Outcome
- gene expressione5
- Direction
- lesse5
- Comparator
- uncoated onee5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“six different cultivars of mango (Gopalbhog, Ranipochand, Khirsapat, Langra, Fazli and Aswina)”
e5“The coated fruits showed less gene expression than uncoated one”
Claim · model-written summary
Quality parameters varied among the six mango cultivars.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae0
- Material
- Gopalbhog, Ranipochand, Khirsapat, Langra, Fazli and Aswinae0
- Outcome
- quality parameterse6
- Qualifier
- variatione6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“six different cultivars of mango (Gopalbhog, Ranipochand, Khirsapat, Langra, Fazli and Aswina)”
e6“All the above information of different mango cultivars showed variation in quality parameters”
The same questions in other papers
pectin · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Aloe vera · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →storage · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
105 papers more in this group
See all 109 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.