Paper · 2008 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Edible Coatings Influence Fruit Ripening, Quality, and Aroma Biosynthesis in Mango Fruit

Khuyen T. H. Dang; Zora Singh; Ewald E. Swinny

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
161
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of different edible coatings on mango fruit ripening and ripe fruit quality parameters including color, firmness, soluble solids concentrations, total acidity, ascorbic acid, total carotenoids, fatty acids, and aroma volatiles were investigated. Hard mature green mango (Mangifera indica L. cv. Kensigton Pride) fruits were coated with aqueous mango carnauba (1:1 v/v), Semperfresh (0.6%), Aloe vera gel (1:1, v/v), or A. vera gel (100%). Untreated fruit served as the control. Following the coating, fruits were allowed to dry at room temperature and packed in soft-board trays to ripen at 21+/-1 degrees C and 55.2+/-11.1% relative humidity until the eating soft stage. Mango carnauba was effective in retarding fruit ripening, retaining fruit firmness, and improving fruit quality attributes including levels of fatty acids and aroma volatiles. Semperfresh and A. vera gel (1:1 or 100%) slightly delayed fruit ripening but reduced fruit aroma volatile development. A. vera gel coating did not exceed the commercial mango carnauba and Semperfresh in retarding fruit ripening and improving aroma volatile biosynthesis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango carnauba delayed mango fruit ripening.

Treatment
Mango carnaubae0
Outcome
fruit ripeninge0
Direction
retardinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mango carnauba was effective in retarding fruit ripening, retaining fruit firmness, and improving fruit quality attributes including levels of fatty acids and aroma volatiles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango fruit”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 77–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango carnauba retained fruit firmness.

Treatment
Mango carnaubae0
Outcome
fruit firmnesse0
Direction
retaininge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mango carnauba was effective in retarding fruit ripening, retaining fruit firmness, and improving fruit quality attributes including levels of fatty acids and aroma volatiles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango fruit”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 77–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango carnauba improved fatty acid levels and aroma volatiles.

Treatment
Mango carnaubae0
Outcome
levels of fatty acids and aroma volatilese0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mango carnauba was effective in retarding fruit ripening, retaining fruit firmness, and improving fruit quality attributes including levels of fatty acids and aroma volatiles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango fruit”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 77–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Semperfresh slightly delayed mango fruit ripening.

Treatment
Semperfreshe0
Outcome
fruit ripeninge0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Semperfresh and A. vera gel (1:1 or 100%) slightly delayed fruit ripening but reduced fruit aroma volatile development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango fruit”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 77–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. vera gel slightly delayed mango fruit ripening.

Treatment
A. vera gel (1:1 or 100%)e0
Outcome
fruit ripeninge0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Semperfresh and A. vera gel (1:1 or 100%) slightly delayed fruit ripening but reduced fruit aroma volatile development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango fruit”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 77–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Semperfresh reduced mango aroma volatile development.

Treatment
Semperfreshe0
Outcome
fruit aroma volatile developmente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Semperfresh and A. vera gel (1:1 or 100%) slightly delayed fruit ripening but reduced fruit aroma volatile development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango fruit”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 77–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. vera gel reduced mango aroma volatile development.

Treatment
A. vera gel (1:1 or 100%)e0
Outcome
fruit aroma volatile developmente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Semperfresh and A. vera gel (1:1 or 100%) slightly delayed fruit ripening but reduced fruit aroma volatile development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango fruit”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 77–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. vera gel did not outperform mango carnauba or Semperfresh for ripening delay and aroma biosynthesis.

Treatment
A. vera gel coatinge0
Outcome
retarding fruit ripening and improving aroma volatile biosynthesise0
Direction
did not exceede0
Comparator
commercial mango carnauba and Semperfreshe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. vera gel coating did not exceed the commercial mango carnauba and Semperfresh in retarding fruit ripening and improving aroma volatile biosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango fruit”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 77–88 · show in text ↑

Aloe vera · quality: phytochemicals · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Aloe vera · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

storage · quality: phytochemicals · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 23 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.