Paper · 2023 · Indian Journal of Pure & Applied Biosciences

Effect of Various Levels of Sulphur and Zinc on Growth and Yield of Late-Sown Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Deepali Joshi

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present study was conducted at the Crop Research Farm of the Institute of Agriculture Training and Research, Prem Nagar, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India, during the 2022-23 year. The experimental design employed was a Factorial Randomized Block Design (RBD), comprising nine treatments each replicated three times. These treatments involved varying level of (Sulphur- 20kg, 25kg, 30kg/ha, Zinc- 20kg, 30kg, 40kg/ha) arranged in an RBD Factorial with plot size 2m×2m varying. The primary objective of this study was to assess the response of wheat crops to different levels of sulphur and zinc fertilization. The results indicated that both nutrients played crucial roles in enhancing late-sown wheat productivity and may offer valuable insights into sustainable crop management practices. Data analysis revealed that the most effective treatment for increasing the Quality characters and Yield is 30 kg Sulphur ha-1 + 40 kg Zinc ha-1 under agro-ecological conditions of Dehradun. This finding has the potential to guide farmers and agriculture practioners in optimizing crop yields and quality in similar environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

30 kg Sulphur ha-1 plus 40 kg Zinc ha-1 was the most effective treatment for quality.

Treatment
30 kg Sulphur ha-1 + 40 kg Zinc ha-1e0
Outcome
Quality characterse0
Direction
increasinge0
Setting
Dehradune0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“the most effective treatment for increasing the Quality characters and Yield is 30 kg Sulphur ha-1 + 40 kg Zinc ha-1 under agro-ecological conditions of Dehradun”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–979 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

30 kg Sulphur ha-1 plus 40 kg Zinc ha-1 was the most effective treatment for yield.

Treatment
30 kg Sulphur ha-1 + 40 kg Zinc ha-1e0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Setting
Dehradune0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“the most effective treatment for increasing the Quality characters and Yield is 30 kg Sulphur ha-1 + 40 kg Zinc ha-1 under agro-ecological conditions of Dehradun”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–979 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

14 papers: 8 positive, 6 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

zinc atom · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.