Paper · 2023 · The Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Growth, yield performance and nitrogen use efficiency of wheat as affected by nitrogen fertilization under arid agro-climatic conditions

Tariq Mushtaq

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Overuse of nitrogenous fertilizers and low productivity of cropping systems produce the lowest nitrogen use efficiencies (NUE) in Pakistan. The surplus nitrogen (N) causes environmental degradation and reduces farm profitability. There is a lack of consideration of NUE while setting yield targets and nitrogen fertilization rates. The NUE is an essential indicator for sustainable crop production. The NUE can be improved with optimum nitrogen application without compromising crop yields. To find out an optimum nitrogen level for high NUE in wheat under agro-climatic conditions of Multan, an RCBD experiment comprising six nitrogen fertilizer doses (0, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 kg ha-1) was conducted during 2017-18 and 2018-19. Increasing levels of N increased the growth and yield attributes, while the maximum cost-benefit ratio was recorded at 150 kg N ha-1. Higher N doses (200 and 250 kg N ha-1) increased the biological yield but did not translate into grain yield, reducing the harvest index and cost-benefit ratio. Several N use efficiency indices were established, showing that 100 kg N ha-1 recorded the maximum nitrogen use efficiency. Partial factor productivity, internal efficiency, and physiological efficiency were maximum at a lower dose (50 kg N ha-1). In contrast, agronomic efficiency, partial nitrogen balance, recovery efficiency, and NUE were maximum at 100 kg N ha-1. Higher N doses (150-250 kg N ha-1) reduced all the N use efficiency indices. It is concluded that with a yield objective of about 5 t ha-1 under the agro-climatic conditions of Multan, a nitrogen application of 100-150 kg N ha-1 will be the most economical and will produce the maximum nitrogen use efficiency for wheat

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen levels increased wheat growth and yield attributes.

Treatment
Increasing levels of Ne0
Outcome
growth and yield attributese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing levels of N increased the growth and yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–799 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum cost-benefit ratio occurred at 150 kg N ha-1.

Treatment
150 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
cost-benefit ratioe0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum cost-benefit ratio was recorded at 150 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–867 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen doses of 200 and 250 kg N ha-1 increased biological yield but not grain yield.

Treatment
Higher N doses (200 and 250 kg N ha-1)e0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher N doses (200 and 250 kg N ha-1) increased the biological yield but did not translate into grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen doses reduced wheat harvest index and cost-benefit ratio.

Treatment
Higher N doses (200 and 250 kg N ha-1)e0
Outcome
harvest index and cost-benefit ratioe0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher N doses (200 and 250 kg N ha-1) increased the biological yield but did not translate into grain yield, reducing the harvest index and cost-benefit ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency was maximal at 100 kg N ha-1.

Treatment
100 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100 kg N ha-1 recorded the maximum nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial factor productivity, internal efficiency and physiological efficiency were maximal at 50 kg N ha-1.

Treatment
50 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
Partial factor productivity, internal efficiency, and physiological efficiencye0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Partial factor productivity, internal efficiency, and physiological efficiency were maximum at a lower dose (50 kg N ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic efficiency, partial nitrogen balance, recovery efficiency and NUE were maximal at 100 kg N ha-1.

Treatment
100 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
agronomic efficiency, partial nitrogen balance, recovery efficiency, and NUEe0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“agronomic efficiency, partial nitrogen balance, recovery efficiency, and NUE were maximum at 100 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1397 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen doses of 150–250 kg N ha-1 reduced all nitrogen use efficiency indices.

Treatment
Higher N doses (150-250 kg N ha-1)e0
Outcome
N use efficiency indicese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher N doses (150-250 kg N ha-1) reduced all the N use efficiency indices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

For a wheat yield target of about 5 t ha-1 in Multan, 100-150 kg N ha-1 is recommended as the most economical rate with maximum NUE.

Treatment
100-150 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
most economical and will produce the maximum nitrogen use efficiencye0
Qualifier
yield objective of about 5 t ha-1e0
Setting
Multane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with a yield objective of about 5 t ha-1 under the agro-climatic conditions of Multan, a nitrogen application of 100-150 kg N ha-1 will be the most economical and will produce the maximum nitrogen use efficiency for wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1718 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

174 papers: 127 positive, 47 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.