Paper · 2018 · Agriculture & Food Security

Effect of split application of different N rates on productivity and nitrogen use efficiency of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Fresew Belete; Nigussie Dechassa; Adamu Molla; et al.

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
62
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Bread wheat is an important staple and cash crop grown by smallholder farmers in the central highlands of Ethiopia. However, the productivity of the crop is constrained by low soil fertility and poor nitrogen fertilizer management in the area. For example, there is limited information on optimum rates and timing of nitrogen fertilizer application in the area. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted for two consecutive years (2014 and 2015) under rain-fed condition to determine the effect of N fertilizer rate and timing of application on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of bread wheat. Factorial combinations of three N levels and five application times plus one control were laid out in a randomized complete block design with four replications. The optimum grain yield (6060.04 kg ha−1) was recorded when 240 kg N ha−1 was applied ¼ at sowing, ½ at tillering and ¼ at booting, and it showed no significant additional response to N fertilizer above this rate. Higher N level (360 kg N ha−1) always increased N content in the grain and nitrogen uptake by wheat crop. The best recovery of nitrogen (59.74%) by wheat was found when 120 kg of nitrogen was applied (¼ at sowing, ½ at tillering and ¼ at booting). The nitrogen use efficiency traits decreased with increased N rate (120–360 kg N ha−1) indicating poor N utilization. The split application of nitrogen (¼ at sowing, ½ at tillering and ¼ at booting) produced the highest nitrogen use efficiency traits. The application of 240 kg N ha−1 in three split doses (T5) was required to obtain optimum wheat yield. In addition, increasing the rate of nitrogen beyond 120 kg N ha−1 decreased nitrogen use efficiency traits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 240 kg N ha−1 three-way split gave optimum grain yield of 6060.04 kg ha−1.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
240 kg N ha−1 was applied ¼ at sowing, ½ at tillering and ¼ at bootinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
optimume0
Value
6060.04 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimum grain yield (6060.04 kg ha−1) was recorded when 240 kg N ha−1 was applied ¼ at sowing, ½ at tillering and ¼ at booting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield had no significant additional response above 240 kg N ha−1.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N fertilizer above this ratee0
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
no significant additional responsee0
Comparator
240 kg N ha−1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it showed no significant additional response to N fertilizer above this rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–976 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“The optimum grain yield (6060.04 kg ha−1) was recorded when 240 kg N ha−1 was applied ¼ at sowing, ½ at tillering and ¼ at booting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 360 kg N ha−1 level increased grain nitrogen content.

Treatment
360 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
N content in the graine0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher N level (360 kg N ha−1) always increased N content in the grain and nitrogen uptake by wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1082 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 360 kg N ha−1 level increased nitrogen uptake.

Treatment
360 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
nitrogen uptake by wheat crope0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher N level (360 kg N ha−1) always increased N content in the grain and nitrogen uptake by wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1082 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 120 kg nitrogen three-way split gave the best nitrogen recovery of 59.74%.

Treatment
120 kg of nitrogen was applied (¼ at sowing, ½ at tillering and ¼ at booting)e0
Outcome
recovery of nitrogene0
Direction
beste0
Value
59.74%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best recovery of nitrogen (59.74%) by wheat was found when 120 kg of nitrogen was applied (¼ at sowing, ½ at tillering and ¼ at booting)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1224 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency traits fell as nitrogen rate rose from 120 to 360 kg N ha−1.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increased N rate (120–360 kg N ha−1)e0
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiency traitse0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nitrogen use efficiency traits decreased with increased N rate (120–360 kg N ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1312 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-way split nitrogen application produced the highest nitrogen use efficiency traits.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
split application of nitrogen (¼ at sowing, ½ at tillering and ¼ at booting)e0
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiency traitse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The split application of nitrogen (¼ at sowing, ½ at tillering and ¼ at booting) produced the highest nitrogen use efficiency traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1476 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–107 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 240 kg N ha−1 in three split doses for optimum wheat yield.

Outcome
application of 240 kg N ha−1 in three split dosese0
Value
240 kg N ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 240 kg N ha−1 in three split doses (T5) was required to obtain optimum wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1579 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

174 papers: 127 positive, 47 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

tillage · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 29 positive, 6 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

479 papers: 410 positive, 69 negative or no effect

409 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

475 papers more in this group

See all 479 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
    T2 produced 420 kg/ha more grain than T3.

    Efficient nitrogen management in wheat through a combination of conventional and nano urea with optimized methods and timing · 2024 · compared with top dressing at 7-10 days after irrigation with same dose

    No difference from an alternativeCites this paper

  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.