Paper · 2023 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Crop-establishment methods and weed management effects on weeds, wheat (Triticum aestivum) yield and economics under a conservation agriculture-based rice (Oryza sativa)–wheat system

RISHI RAJ; T.K. DAS; AMAL GHOSH; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute during the winter (rabi) season of 2018–19 and 2019–20 involving 6 tillage and residue practices, viz. T1 , zero-till (ZT) direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) (ZTDSR)–zero-till wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend Fiori & Paol] (ZTW); T2 , ZTDSR + wheat residue (WR)–ZTW + rice residue (RR); T3 , ZTDSR + WR + brown manuring (BM) – ZTW+RR; T4 , ZTDSR–ZTW– ZT mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek] (ZTMB); T5, ZTDSR + mungbean residue (MBR) – ZTW + RR – ZTMB+WR; T6 , puddled transplanted rice (PTR)–conventional till wheat (CTW) in main plot; and 4 weed-control treatments, i.e. W1 , un-weeded control; W2 , Total (ready mix of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron-methyl) 0.040 kg/ha at 30 day after sowing (DAS); W3 , tank-mixture of clodinafop-propargyl 0.060 kg/ha + metsulfuron-methyl 0.004 kg/ha at 30 DAS; W4 , tank-mixture of clodinafop-propargyl 0.060 kg/ha + carfentrazone-ethyl 0.02 kg/ha at 30 DAS in sub-plot under a split-plot design and replicated thrice. Treatment T6 resulted in significantly higher population and dry weight of littleseed canarygrass (Phalaris minor Retz.), yellow sweet clover [Melilotus indica (L.) All.] and swine cress [Coronopus didymus (L.) Smith] than other treatments, whereas, population and dry weight of common lambsquarter (Chenopodium album L.), sour dock (Rumex dentatus L.) and annual sowthistle (Sonchus oleraceus L.) were significantly higher under T1 and T4 treatments. The treatment T5 registered ~62, 44, 35, 31 and 24% lower population of P. minor than T6 , T1 , T4 , T2 and T3 treatments, respectively. Similarly, total weed population and total weed dry weight were ~38 and 33% lower under T5 compared with T6 treatment respectively. Better wheat growth and lower weed interference under T5 treatment led to 14.6% higher wheat grain yield under this treatment than T6 . The tank- mix of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron significantly reduced the population and dry weight of all weeds compared to UWC and it led to 88.9% weed-control efficiency (WCE) and 89.4% weed-control index (WCI) in wheat. Therefore, growing of wheat under zero-till triple cropping system with rice, wheat and mungbean residues (T5 ) combined with tank-mix application of clodinafop + metsulfuron at 30 DAS may be recommended for better weed management, and higher productivity and profitability from wheat in Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) of India and in similar agro-ecologies of the tropics/ sub-tropics.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 increased littleseed canarygrass population and dry weight.

Treatment
Treatment T6e0
Interactor
Phalaris minor Retz.Phalaris minore0weed
Outcome
population and dry weight of littleseed canarygrasse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment T6 resulted in significantly higher population and dry weight of littleseed canarygrass (Phalaris minor Retz.), yellow sweet clover [Melilotus indica (L.) All.] and swine cress [Coronopus didymus (L.) Smith] than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 increased yellow sweet clover population and dry weight.

Treatment
Treatment T6e0
Interactor
Melilotus indica (L.) All.Melilotus indicuse0weed
Outcome
population and dry weight of littleseed canarygrasse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Melilotus indicus
Melilotus indicus · InteractorZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment T6 resulted in significantly higher population and dry weight of littleseed canarygrass (Phalaris minor Retz.), yellow sweet clover [Melilotus indica (L.) All.] and swine cress [Coronopus didymus (L.) Smith] than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 increased swine cress population and dry weight.

Treatment
Treatment T6e0
Interactor
Coronopus didymus (L.) SmithLepidium didymume0weed
Outcome
population and dry weight of littleseed canarygrasse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lepidium didymum
Lepidium didymum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment T6 resulted in significantly higher population and dry weight of littleseed canarygrass (Phalaris minor Retz.), yellow sweet clover [Melilotus indica (L.) All.] and swine cress [Coronopus didymus (L.) Smith] than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 and T4 had higher common lambsquarter, sour dock and sowthistle population and dry weight.

Treatment
T1 and T4 treatmentse0
Interactor
Chenopodium album L.Chenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
population and dry weight of common lambsquartere0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“population and dry weight of common lambsquarter (Chenopodium album L.), sour dock (Rumex dentatus L.) and annual sowthistle (Sonchus oleraceus L.) were significantly higher under T1 and T4 treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1500 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 reduced P. minor population by about 62%, 44%, 35%, 31% and 24% versus T6, T1, T4, T2 and T3, respectively.

Treatment
T5e0
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
population of P. minore0
Direction
lowere0
Value
~62, 44, 35, 31 and 24%e0
Comparator
T6 , T1 , T4 , T2 and T3 treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment T5 registered ~62, 44, 35, 31 and 24% lower population of P. minor than T6 , T1 , T4 , T2 and T3 treatments, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1637 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total weed population was about 38% lower under T5 than T6.

Treatment
T5e0
Outcome
total weed populatione0
Direction
lowere0
Value
~38e0
Comparator
T6 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total weed population and total weed dry weight were ~38 and 33% lower under T5 compared with T6 treatment respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1649–1769 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total weed dry weight was about 33% lower under T5 than T6.

Treatment
T5e0
Outcome
total weed dry weighte0
Direction
lowere0
Value
33%e0
Comparator
T6 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total weed population and total weed dry weight were ~38 and 33% lower under T5 compared with T6 treatment respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1649–1769 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 raised wheat grain yield by 14.6% versus T6.

Treatment
T5 treatmente0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
14.6%e0
Comparator
T6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Better wheat growth and lower weed interference under T5 treatment led to 14.6% higher wheat grain yield under this treatment than T6 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1770–1905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The clodinafop-propargyl and metsulfuron mixture significantly reduced weed population and dry weight versus unweeded control.

Treatment
tank- mix of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfurone0
Outcome
population and dry weight of all weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
UWCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tank- mix of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron significantly reduced the population and dry weight of all weeds compared to UWC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1906–2038 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide mixture achieved 88.9% weed-control efficiency.

Treatment
tank- mix of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfurone1
Outcome
weed-control efficiencye0
Value
88.9%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it led to 88.9% weed-control efficiency (WCE) and 89.4% weed-control index (WCI) in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2043–2133 · show in text ↑
e1

“tank- mix of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1910–1957 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide mixture achieved 89.4% weed-control index.

Treatment
tank- mix of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfurone1
Outcome
weed-control indexe0
Value
89.4%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it led to 88.9% weed-control efficiency (WCE) and 89.4% weed-control index (WCI) in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2043–2133 · show in text ↑
e1

“tank- mix of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1910–1957 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–90 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend T5 with clodinafop plus metsulfuron at 30 DAS for wheat weed management, productivity and profitability.

Treatment
zero-till triple cropping system with rice, wheat and mungbean residues (T5 ) combined with tank-mix application of clodinafop + metsulfuron at 30 DASe0
Outcome
better weed management, and higher productivity and profitabilitye0
Setting
Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) of Indiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growing of wheat under zero-till triple cropping system with rice, wheat and mungbean residues (T5 ) combined with tank-mix application of clodinafop + metsulfuron at 30 DAS may be recommended for better weed management, and higher productivity and profitability from wheat in Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) of India and in similar agro-ecologies of the tropics/ sub-tropics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2145–2516 · show in text ↑

clodinafop-propargyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 34 positive, 3 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 132 positive, 2 negative or no effect

131 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.