Paper · 2023 · Ilmu Pertanian (Agricultural Science)

Effects of mycorrhiza and phosphate fertilizers on the growth and yield of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) under drought stress conditions

Anissatul Laili; Okti Herliana; Ahadiyat Yugi Rahayu; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Millet is a cereal plant that’s potential for rice substitution. This plant is adaptive to be cultivated in dry land but has a tolerance limit to drought stress. Mycorrhiza and phospate (P) fertilizer treatments help plants adapt to this condition. This study aimed to determine the effects of phosphate fertilizer and mycorrhiza as well as their interaction effects on the growth and yield of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) under drought stress. The experiment was carried out from January to June 2020 in the experimental farm, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jenderal Soedirman. The research was arranged in a factorial randomized complete block design consisting of two factors. The first factor was the dose of SP-36 fertilizer per polybag, namely P0 = 0 g, P1 = 37,5 kg.ha⁻¹ (25%), P2 = 75 kg.ha⁻¹ = 0.88 g/polybag (50%), and P3 = 150 kg.ha⁻¹. The second factor was the dose of mycorrhiza biofertilizer, namely M0 = 0 g.polibag⁻¹, M1 = 33.3 g. polibag⁻¹ and M2 = 66.6 g.polybag⁻¹. The treatment was replicated three times. The data observed were analyzed using the F test, continued with DMRT test at p=0.05. The results showed that SP-36 fertilizer application at half of the recommended dose (0.88 g/polybag) could increase growth variables, such as leaf area, panicle length, and seed weight. Mycorrhizae application 33.3 g/polybag could improve variables such as plant height, leaf area, panicle length, and seed weight. It also accelerated the initiation of panicle emergence compared to control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half the recommended SP-36 dose increased leaf area, panicle length, and seed weight.

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicat0
Treatment
SP-36 fertilizer application at half of the recommended dose (0.88 g/polybag)e0
Outcome
leaf area, panicle length, and seed weighte0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SP-36 fertilizer application at half of the recommended dose (0.88 g/polybag) could increase growth variables, such as leaf area, panicle length, and seed weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1311 · show in text ↑
t0

“foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhiza at 33.3 g/polybag improved height, leaf area, and panicle length.

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicat0
Treatment
Mycorrhizae application 33.3 g/polybage0
Interactor
Mycorrhizaee0symbiont
Outcome
plant height, leaf area, panicle lengthe0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizae application 33.3 g/polybag could improve variables such as plant height, leaf area, panicle length, and seed weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1440 · show in text ↑
t0

“foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhiza at 33.3 g/polybag improved seed weight.

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicat0
Treatment
Mycorrhizae application 33.3 g/polybage0
Interactor
Mycorrhizaee0symbiont
Outcome
seed weighte0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizae application 33.3 g/polybag could improve variables such as plant height, leaf area, panicle length, and seed weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1440 · show in text ↑
t0

“foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhiza accelerated panicle emergence compared with control.

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicat0
Treatment
Mycorrhizae application 33.3 g/polybage0
Interactor
Mycorrhizaee0symbiont
Outcome
initiation of panicle emergencee0
Direction
acceleratede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizae application 33.3 g/polybag could improve variables such as plant height, leaf area, panicle length, and seed weight. It also accelerated the initiation of panicle emergence compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1517 · show in text ↑
t0

“foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–110 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Setaria italica (foxtail millet)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 53 positive, 2 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Setaria italica (foxtail millet)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.