Paper · 2023 · Annals of the University of Craiova Series Biology Horticulture Food products processing technology Environmental engineering

THE BIOSTIMULATORY EFFECT OF BROWN ALGAE ASCOPHYLLUM NODOSUM ON GRAPEVINE

Carmen Sirbu; Traian-Mihai Cioroianu; Nicoleta Marin; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Currently, the global wine industry is facing numerous challenges related to climate change and the unpredictability of weather conditions. The administration of biostimulants derived from algae to grapevines brings a series of benefits that translate into increased and quality productions.Two biostimulators containing Ascophyllum nodosum were tested in a vineyard on Chasselas Dore grapes. The testing involved three foliar applications at a 0.5% concentration during the vegetative phase. The use of the products with algae led to increases in yield cu 33.3% (AN product) și 38.7% (AN-ME product). The application of the three foliar treatments with an vegetable biostimulant increased by 46.6 – 48.5% the process of photosynthetic assimilation in the vineyard. Also, the nutrient content in the plant (leaves and clusters) has recorded a significant increase.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AN product increased grape yield by 33.3%.

Taxon
GRAPEVINEVitist0
Material
GRAPEVINEt0
Treatment
AN producte0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
33.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of the products with algae led to increases in yield cu 33.3% (AN product) și 38.7% (AN-ME product).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–601 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPEVINE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AN-ME product increased grape yield by 38.7%.

Taxon
GRAPEVINEVitist0
Treatment
AN-ME producte0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
38.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of the products with algae led to increases in yield cu 33.3% (AN product) și 38.7% (AN-ME product).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–601 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPEVINE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar biostimulant treatment increased photosynthetic assimilation by 46.6–48.5%.

Taxon
GRAPEVINEVitist0
Treatment
three foliar treatments with an vegetable biostimulante0
Outcome
photosynthetic assimilatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
46.6 – 48.5%e0
Setting
vineyarde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of the three foliar treatments with an vegetable biostimulant increased by 46.6 – 48.5% the process of photosynthetic assimilation in the vineyard.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPEVINE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant nutrient content in leaves and clusters increased significantly.

Taxon
GRAPEVINEVitist0
Organ / stage
leaves and clusterse0
Treatment
ASCOPHYLLUM NODOSUMt0
Outcome
nutrient contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, the nutrient content in the plant (leaves and clusters) has recorded a significant increase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–864 · show in text ↑
t0

“THE BIOSTIMULATORY EFFECT OF BROWN ALGAE ASCOPHYLLUM NODOSUM ON GRAPEVINE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑

application · physiology: photosynthesis · VitisPositive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

other · physiology: photosynthesis · VitisResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.