Abstract
Assuming that common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars differ in terms of the potential to respond to symbiosis with rhizobia, in this direction, this work aimed to identify those that are more efficient and responsive to biological nitrogen fixation. The interaction of common bean cultivars and rhizobia inoculation at greenhouse conditions was evaluated. Six common bean cultivars (IPR-Sabiá, IPR-Quero-Quero, IPR-Andorinha, IPR-Curió, IPR-Tangará, and IPR-Campos Gerais) were inoculated using a mixture of rhizobia strains (Rhizobium tropici and R. freirei). The completely randomized experimental design arranged in a 6 × 2 factorial scheme with five replications was used. Growth, nodulation, and yield performance of common bean cultivars with and without rhizobia inoculation were evaluated. Rhizobia strains increased nodulation, plant growth, and grain yield in all cultivars used. There was an influence of interaction between rhizobia inoculation and common bean cultivars on root volume, and on dry matter root and shoot. The cultivar IPR-Curió showed the highest number of nodules and nodule dry matter. It can be concluded that the inoculation was consistent for all cultivars used, but some differences in the response from the cultivars indicate a possible effect of the genotype.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobia inoculation increased nodulation, plant growth, and grain yield in all six common bean cultivars compared with no inoculation under greenhouse conditions.
- Taxon
- Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgarise4 - Material
- common bean cultivarse3
- Treatment
- rhizobia inoculatione3
- Interactor
- rhizobia strainse1symbiont
- Outcome
- nodulation, plant growth, and grain yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- without rhizobia inoculatione2
- Setting
- greenhouse conditionse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Rhizobia strains increased nodulation, plant growth, and grain yield in all cultivars used”
e2“Growth, nodulation, and yield performance of common bean cultivars with and without rhizobia inoculation were evaluated”
e3“The interaction of common bean cultivars and rhizobia inoculation at greenhouse conditions was evaluated”
e4“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars differ”
Claim · model-written summary
Interaction between rhizobia inoculation and cultivar influenced root volume and root and shoot dry matter.
- Taxon
- Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgarise2 - Material
- common bean cultivarse1
- Treatment
- rhizobia inoculatione1
- Outcome
- root volume, and on dry matter root and shoote1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“There was an influence of interaction between rhizobia inoculation and common bean cultivars on root volume, and on dry matter root and shoot”
e2“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars differ”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar IPR-Curió had the highest number of nodules and nodule dry matter.
- Taxon
- Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgarise2 - Material
- IPR-Curióe1
- Outcome
- number of nodules and nodule dry mattere1
- Direction
- higheste1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“The cultivar IPR-Curió showed the highest number of nodules and nodule dry matter”
e2“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars differ”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation response was consistent across cultivars, but cultivar differences suggest a possible genotype effect.
- Taxon
- Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgarise2 - Material
- cultivarse1
- Treatment
- inoculatione1
- Outcome
- differences in the responsee1
- Qualifier
- possible effect of the genotypee1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“the inoculation was consistent for all cultivars used, but some differences in the response from the cultivars indicate a possible effect of the genotype”
e2“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars differ”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
86 papers more in this group
See all 90 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.