Paper · 2023 · Heliyon

Effects of integrated plant nutrition systems with fertilizer deep placement on rice yields and nitrogen use efficiency under different irrigation regimes

S.M. Mofijul Islam; Yam Kanta Gaihre; Md. Rafiqul Islam; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Improved fertilizer management, with a combination of organic and inorganic inputs, has the potential to enhance rice yield while maintaining soil health. However, studies on the effects of broadcast prilled urea (PU) and urea deep placement (UDP) applied in combination with organic inputs (poultry litter [PL] and vermicompost [VC]), as integrated plant nutrition systems (IPNSs), on rice yields and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) under alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation are limited. We conducted field experiments during the dry and wet seasons of 2018, 2019, and 2020 to investigate the effects of fertilizer treatments, including control (no nitrogen), UDP, PU, and IPNSs (PU + VC, PU + PL, and UDP + PL) on rice yield and NUE under two irrigation regimes – AWD and continuous flooding (CF). The results revealed that fertilizer treatment and irrigation regime had significant (p < 0.05) interaction effects on rice yield and the agronomic efficiency of N (AE N ) during the dry season. UDP significantly (p < 0.05) boosted rice yield, total dry matter (TDM), and NUE as compared to broadcast PU in both wet and dry seasons. Similarly, the IPNS treatment of UDP with PL significantly (p < 0.05) boosted rice yield, TDM, and NUE in comparison to broadcast PU. Under AWD irrigation, UDP alone produced higher rice yields than other treatments, while UDP, and UDP with PL produced similar yields under CF irrigation. During the dry season, AWD irrigation significantly (p < 0.05) increased rice yield, TDM, and AE N when compared to CF conditions, but during the wet season, AWD irrigation demonstrated a rice yield and NUE equivalent to CF. This research implies that using a UDP alone or in combination with PL as an IPNS could be a good way to boost crop productivity while also maintaining soil fertility.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer and irrigation interacted significantly on dry-season rice yield.

Treatment
fertilizer treatment and irrigation regimee0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Qualifier
dry seasone0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizer treatment and irrigation regime had significant (p < 0.05) interaction effects on rice yield and the agronomic efficiency of N (AE N ) during the dry season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–84 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer and irrigation interacted significantly on dry-season agronomic N efficiency.

Treatment
fertilizer treatment and irrigation regimee0
Outcome
agronomic efficiency of N (AE N )e0
Qualifier
dry seasone0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizer treatment and irrigation regime had significant (p < 0.05) interaction effects on rice yield and the agronomic efficiency of N (AE N ) during the dry season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UDP increased yield, dry matter and NUE versus broadcast PU in both seasons.

Treatment
UDPe0
Outcome
rice yield, total dry matter (TDM), and NUEe0
Direction
boostede0
Qualifier
both wet and dry seasonse0
Comparator
broadcast PUe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UDP significantly (p < 0.05) boosted rice yield, total dry matter (TDM), and NUE as compared to broadcast PU in both wet and dry seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UDP with PL increased yield, dry matter and NUE versus broadcast PU.

Treatment
UDP with PLe0
Outcome
rice yield, TDM, and NUEe0
Direction
boostede0
Comparator
broadcast PUe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UDP with PL significantly (p < 0.05) boosted rice yield, TDM, and NUE in comparison to broadcast PU.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under AWD, UDP alone yielded more rice than other treatments.

Treatment
UDP alonee0
Outcome
rice yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
AWD irrigatione0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under AWD irrigation, UDP alone produced higher rice yields than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1356 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under continuous flooding, UDP and UDP plus PL had similar yields.

Treatment
UDP, and UDP with PLe0
Outcome
similar yieldse0
Qualifier
CF irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UDP, and UDP with PL produced similar yields under CF irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the dry season, AWD increased yield, dry matter and agronomic N efficiency versus continuous flooding.

Treatment
AWD irrigatione0
Outcome
rice yield, TDM, and AE Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
dry seasone0
Comparator
CF conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“during the dry season, AWD irrigation significantly (p < 0.05) increased rice yield, TDM, and AE N when compared to CF conditions”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1430–1559 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the wet season, AWD produced yield and NUE equivalent to continuous flooding.

Treatment
AWD irrigatione0
Outcome
rice yield and NUE equivalent to CFe0
Qualifier
wet seasone0
Comparator
CFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“during the wet season, AWD irrigation demonstrated a rice yield and NUE equivalent to CF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1654 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–84 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed UDP alone or with PL to improve productivity while maintaining soil fertility.

Outcome
boost crop productivity while also maintaining soil fertilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using a UDP alone or in combination with PL as an IPNS could be a good way to boost crop productivity while also maintaining soil fertility.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1682–1822 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–84 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

401 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.