Paper · 2023 · Journal of Animal Science

PSII-14 Chemical Composition of Tropical Forage Fertilized with Different Sources of Nitrogen Fertilizers

Débora Siniscalchi; Karine Dalla Vecchia Camargo; Natalia Vilas Boas Fonseca; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Nitrogen fertilization can improve the chemical composition of tropical forages, as nitrogen is required at all stages of plant development. The aim of this study was to verify the chemical composition of Urochloa brizantha cv. marandu fertilized with different sources of nitrogen fertilizers from the following treatments: without nitrogen fertilization (CO), fertilization with urea (UR), fertilization with ammonium nitrate (NI) and fertilization with ammonium sulfate (SA). The study was carried out from December 2021 to April 2022, in the cerrado biome of Brazil at the FCAV/UNESP Forage Sector, Jaboticabal Campus, during the rearing phase of Nelore cattle, non-castrated males kept on pasture, managed in a continuous stocking system and variable load capacity. In treatments with fertilization, 150 kg of N· ha-1 were applied, divided into 3 applications. The design used was in randomized blocks (DBC). The evaluation of the chemical composition of the forage was carried out from collections every 28 days of samples of the fraction of the forage consumed by the animals through the hand-plucking method. The samples were dried at 55ºC for 72 hours and ground in a Willey mill, with a 1 mm mesh sieve. The chemical composition of the forage was estimated by spectroscopy in the near infrared light region, NIRS (Near Infrared Spectrometer), using a modular FT-NIR spectrometer. The data obtained were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey's test (P ≤ 0.05), using the statistical program R, version 3.4.4. Nitrogen fertilization significantly increased the organic matter content of the forage (P = 0.001). The organic matter content of the non-fertilized treatment was 91.97%, while the average of the fertilized treatments was 92.22%. The percentage of crude protein in the forage also showed a significant difference (P < 0.001) between the non-fertilized treatment, which had an average of 10.64%, and the fertilized treatments, which had an average of 17.75%. The neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber components also differed from the application of nitrogen fertilizer (P < 0.001) but did not differ between the types of fertilizers. The neutral detergent fiber content was significantly different (P < 0.001) between the non-fertilized treatment (59.21%) and the fertilized treatments (54.30%). The observed data for acid detergent fiber were 31.46% for the treatment without the use of fertilizers and 30.24% for the treatments with the use of fertilizers. Non-fibrous carbohydrates and liguinin components were also analyzed, but showed no difference between treatments, P = 0.078 and P = 0.209, respectively. This study confirms that the chemical composition of Urochloa brizantha cv. Marandu can be significantly improved through the application of nitrogen fertilizers. However, our results showed no significant difference between the types of fertilizers tested.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization increased forage organic matter from 91.97% to 92.22%.

Taxon
Urochloa brizantha cv. maranduUrochloa brizanthae1
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
organic matter contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
92.22%e0
Qualifier
91.97%e0
Comparator
non-fertilized treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa brizantha
Urochloa brizantha · Taxonhttp://www.hear.org/starr/imageusepolicy.htm This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. Attribution: Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilization significantly increased the organic matter content of the forage (P = 0.001). The organic matter content of the non-fertilized treatment was 91.97%, while the average of the fertilized treatments was 92.22%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1747 · show in text ↑
e1

“Urochloa brizantha cv. marandu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization increased crude protein from 10.64% to 17.75%.

Taxon
Urochloa brizantha cv. maranduUrochloa brizanthae1
Treatment
fertilized treatmentse0
Outcome
percentage of crude proteine0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
17.75%e0
Qualifier
10.64%e0
Comparator
non-fertilized treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa brizantha
Urochloa brizantha · Taxonhttp://www.hear.org/starr/imageusepolicy.htm This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. Attribution: Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage of crude protein in the forage also showed a significant difference (P < 0.001) between the non-fertilized treatment, which had an average of 10.64%, and the fertilized treatments, which had an average of 17.75%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1749–1975 · show in text ↑
e1

“Urochloa brizantha cv. marandu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization lowered neutral detergent fiber from 59.21% to 54.30%.

Taxon
Urochloa brizantha cv. maranduUrochloa brizanthae1
Treatment
fertilized treatmentse0
Outcome
neutral detergent fiber contente0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
54.30%e0
Qualifier
59.21%e0
Comparator
non-fertilized treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa brizantha
Urochloa brizantha · Taxonhttp://www.hear.org/starr/imageusepolicy.htm This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. Attribution: Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The neutral detergent fiber content was significantly different (P < 0.001) between the non-fertilized treatment (59.21%) and the fertilized treatments (54.30%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2164–2324 · show in text ↑
e1

“Urochloa brizantha cv. marandu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization lowered acid detergent fiber from 31.46% to 30.24%.

Taxon
Urochloa brizantha cv. maranduUrochloa brizanthae1
Treatment
treatments with the use of fertilizerse0
Outcome
acid detergent fibere0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
30.24%e0
Qualifier
31.46%e0
Comparator
treatment without the use of fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa brizantha
Urochloa brizantha · Taxonhttp://www.hear.org/starr/imageusepolicy.htm This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. Attribution: Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The observed data for acid detergent fiber were 31.46% for the treatment without the use of fertilizers and 30.24% for the treatments with the use of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2326–2487 · show in text ↑
e1

“Urochloa brizantha cv. marandu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-fibrous carbohydrates did not differ between fertilizer treatments.

Taxon
Urochloa brizantha cv. maranduUrochloa brizanthae1
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
Non-fibrous carbohydratese0
Direction
no differencee0
Comparator
treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa brizantha
Urochloa brizantha · Taxonhttp://www.hear.org/starr/imageusepolicy.htm This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. Attribution: Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Non-fibrous carbohydrates and liguinin components were also analyzed, but showed no difference between treatments, P = 0.078 and P = 0.209, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2489–2641 · show in text ↑
e1

“Urochloa brizantha cv. marandu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Liguinin did not differ between fertilizer treatments.

Taxon
Urochloa brizantha cv. maranduUrochloa brizanthae1
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
liguinin componentse0
Direction
no differencee0
Comparator
treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa brizantha
Urochloa brizantha · Taxonhttp://www.hear.org/starr/imageusepolicy.htm This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. Attribution: Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Non-fibrous carbohydrates and liguinin components were also analyzed, but showed no difference between treatments, P = 0.078 and P = 0.209, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2489–2641 · show in text ↑
e1

“Urochloa brizantha cv. marandu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The tested nitrogen fertilizer types did not differ significantly in their effects on forage composition.

Taxon
Urochloa brizantha cv. maranduUrochloa brizanthae1
Treatment
types of fertilizers testede0
Outcome
difference between the types of fertilizers testede0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
types of fertilizers testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa brizantha
Urochloa brizantha · Taxonhttp://www.hear.org/starr/imageusepolicy.htm This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. Attribution: Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“our results showed no significant difference between the types of fertilizers tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2815–2899 · show in text ↑
e1

“Urochloa brizantha cv. marandu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–244 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: grain · Urochloa brizantha (palisade grass)Results differ

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Urochloa brizantha (palisade grass)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Urochloa brizantha (palisade grass)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.