Paper · 2023 · Agriculture and Natural Resources

Responses of physiological traits, growth and yield of rice to drought stress

9
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Importance of the work: Rice plants are sensitive to different levels of drought during all growth stages.Drought induces reduced rice growth and yield by affecting the growth parameters and physiological traits related to photosynthate production.The response of rice plants to drought stress is useful information for evaluating drought-tolerant characteristics in high yielding cultivars.Objectives: To study the growth parameters and physiological traits, yield and yield components of two rice cultivars during various growth stages under polyethylene glycol (PEG)-induced drought stress. Materials & Methods:The Khao Dawk Mali 105 (KDML 105) and Pathum Thani 1 (PT 1) rice cultivars were grown under two conditions (non-stress and drought stress) in a hydroponic system.The growth parameters, physiological traits and yield were evaluated after water stress induction during the seedling, tillering and flowering stages.Results: The growth parameters and physiological traits of the two rice cultivars significantly decreased, while the free proline and spermidine contents increased under stress during all growth stages.However, the flowering stage was the most sensitive to drought.In addition, there was a greater decrease in all the studied growth and physiological traits of PT 1 under drought than for those of KDML 105.The grain yield was reduced by 35.9-50% for PT 1 and by 18.6-31% for KDML 105.Positive correlations were obtained between all the studied physiological traits and grain yield in both cultivars; however, the highest correlation to grain yield was obtained from the leaf water potential (LWP) and net photosynthetic rate.Main finding: The magnitudes of drought response varied between the cultivars and among the growth stages.PT 1 was more sensitive to drought than KDML 105 and the flowering stage was the most sensitive stage.LWP could be used to study the plant-water status and to evaluate drought-tolerance characteristics, as it had the highest correlation to yield, was less influenced by other variables and could be measured easily during all growth stages without damaging the whole plant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly reduced growth parameters and physiological traits in both rice cultivars at all stages.

Material
Khao Dawk Mali 105 (KDML 105) and Pathum Thani 1 (PT 1)e1
Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
growth parameters and physiological traitse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
during all growth stagese0
Comparator
non-stresse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth parameters and physiological traits of the two rice cultivars significantly decreased, while the free proline and spermidine contents increased under stress during all growth stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1128 · show in text ↑
e1

“Khao Dawk Mali 105 (KDML 105) and Pathum Thani 1 (PT 1) rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–688 · show in text ↑
e2

“non-stress and drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased free proline and spermidine contents in both rice cultivars at all stages.

Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
free proline and spermidine contentse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
during all growth stagese0
Comparator
non-stresse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the free proline and spermidine contents increased under stress during all growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1127 · show in text ↑
e1

“the two rice cultivars significantly decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1031 · show in text ↑
e2

“non-stress and drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–751 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The flowering stage was the most drought-sensitive stage in rice.

Organ / stage
flowering stagee0
Outcome
most sensitive to droughte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the flowering stage was the most sensitive to drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1190 · show in text ↑
e1

“the two rice cultivars significantly decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1031 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PT 1 had greater drought-related declines in growth and physiological traits than KDML 105.

Material
PT 1e0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
growth and physiological traitse0
Direction
greater decreasee0
Comparator
KDML 105e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was a greater decrease in all the studied growth and physiological traits of PT 1 under drought than for those of KDML 105”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1332 · show in text ↑
e1

“the two rice cultivars significantly decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1031 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced PT 1 grain yield by 35.9-50%.

Material
PT 1e0
Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
35.9-50%e0
Comparator
non-stresse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield was reduced by 35.9-50% for PT 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1381 · show in text ↑
e1

“the two rice cultivars significantly decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1031 · show in text ↑
e2

“non-stress and drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced KDML 105 grain yield by 18.6-31%.

Material
KDML 105e0
Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
18.6-31%e0
Comparator
non-stresse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield was reduced by 35.9-50% for PT 1 and by 18.6-31% for KDML 105.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1411 · show in text ↑
e1

“the two rice cultivars significantly decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1031 · show in text ↑
e2

“non-stress and drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–751 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Studied physiological traits correlated positively with grain yield in both rice cultivars.

Material
both cultivarse0
Outcome
correlations were obtained between all the studied physiological traits and grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Positive correlations were obtained between all the studied physiological traits and grain yield in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1525 · show in text ↑
e1

“the two rice cultivars significantly decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1031 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf water potential and net photosynthetic rate had the highest correlation with rice grain yield.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
highest correlation to grain yielde0
Qualifier
leaf water potential (LWP) and net photosynthetic ratee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest correlation to grain yield was obtained from the leaf water potential (LWP) and net photosynthetic rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1651 · show in text ↑
e1

“the two rice cultivars significantly decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1031 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose LWP for measuring plant-water status and drought tolerance because it correlates strongly with yield and is easy and nondestructive to measure.

Outcome
LWP could be used to study the plant-water status and to evaluate drought-tolerance characteristicse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LWP could be used to study the plant-water status and to evaluate drought-tolerance characteristics, as it had the highest correlation to yield, was less influenced by other variables and could be measured easily during all growth stages without damaging the whole plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1860–2131 · show in text ↑
e1

“the two rice cultivars significantly decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1031 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

282 papers: 98 positive, 184 negative or no effect

183 papers in the same direction as this paper · 98 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

278 papers more in this group

See all 282 papers →

drought · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

325 papers: 76 positive, 249 negative or no effect

248 papers in the same direction as this paper · 76 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

321 papers more in this group

See all 325 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.