Paper · 2023 · Sustainability

Performance of Mango Trees under the Spraying of Some Biostimulants

Khalid F. Almutairi; Krzysztof Górnik; Ahmed Ayoub; et al.

13
claims
31
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Ensuring the sustainability of horticultural production is crucial to meeting consumer demand, and the most effective approach involves enhancing the efficient utilization of resources to support the production of wholesome foods. Plant biostimulants are substances defined by their ability, when applied to plants or the rhizosphere, to enhance root development, resulting in heightened vigor. They facilitate the more effective uptake and translocation of nutrients and water throughout the growing season. Additionally, these biostimulants contribute to improved plant health and quality by supplying essential nutrients that stimulate overall growth and metabolic processes. Therefore, this study was performed to examine the impact of some biostimulants on the possibility of improving vegetative growth, yield, fruit quality, and the leaf mineral content of mango cv. Keitt. Mango trees were sprayed with Putrescine at 25, 50, and 100 mg/L; Brassinosteroids at 0.5, 1, and 2 mg/L; and Chitosan at 500, 1000, and 1500 mg/L four times starting from mid-April, with three-week intervals during the seasons of 2021 and 2022. The results showed that the foliar application of these three biostimulants improved the growth, yield, and fruit quality of mango trees as opposed to untreated trees during two study seasons. The results also showed that the foliar application of 1500 mg/L of Chit, 2 mg/L of Brs, and 100 mg/L of Put gave the highest increments for inducing the number, length, and thickness of shoots, leaf area, and leaf chlorophyll over the other applied treatments. In addition, it also heightened the fruit set, fruit yield, and the fruit’s physical and chemical characteristics in both experimental seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of the three biostimulants improved mango growth, yield and fruit quality versus untreated trees in both seasons.

Treatment
foliar application of these three biostimulantse0
Outcome
growth, yield, and fruit qualitye0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
during two study seasonse0
Comparator
untreated treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the foliar application of these three biostimulants improved the growth, yield, and fruit quality of mango trees as opposed to untreated trees during two study seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 1500 mg/L Chit gave the highest increments in shoot number, length and thickness relative to other treatments.

Treatment
1500 mg/L of Chite0
Outcome
number, length, and thickness of shootse0
Direction
highest incrementse0
Comparator
other applied treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the foliar application of 1500 mg/L of Chit, 2 mg/L of Brs, and 100 mg/L of Put gave the highest increments for inducing the number, length, and thickness of shoots, leaf area, and leaf chlorophyll over the other applied treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 2 mg/L Brs gave the highest increments in shoot number, length and thickness relative to other treatments.

Treatment
2 mg/L of Brse0
Outcome
number, length, and thickness of shootse0
Direction
highest incrementse0
Comparator
other applied treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the foliar application of 1500 mg/L of Chit, 2 mg/L of Brs, and 100 mg/L of Put gave the highest increments for inducing the number, length, and thickness of shoots, leaf area, and leaf chlorophyll over the other applied treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 100 mg/L Put gave the highest increments in shoot number, length and thickness relative to other treatments.

Treatment
100 mg/L of Pute0
Outcome
number, length, and thickness of shootse0
Direction
highest incrementse0
Comparator
other applied treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the foliar application of 1500 mg/L of Chit, 2 mg/L of Brs, and 100 mg/L of Put gave the highest increments for inducing the number, length, and thickness of shoots, leaf area, and leaf chlorophyll over the other applied treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 1500 mg/L Chit gave the highest increments in leaf area and chlorophyll.

Treatment
1500 mg/L of Chite0
Outcome
leaf area, and leaf chlorophylle0
Direction
highest incrementse0
Comparator
other applied treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the foliar application of 1500 mg/L of Chit, 2 mg/L of Brs, and 100 mg/L of Put gave the highest increments for inducing the number, length, and thickness of shoots, leaf area, and leaf chlorophyll over the other applied treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 2 mg/L Brs gave the highest increments in leaf area and chlorophyll.

Treatment
2 mg/L of Brse0
Outcome
leaf area, and leaf chlorophylle0
Direction
highest incrementse0
Comparator
other applied treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the foliar application of 1500 mg/L of Chit, 2 mg/L of Brs, and 100 mg/L of Put gave the highest increments for inducing the number, length, and thickness of shoots, leaf area, and leaf chlorophyll over the other applied treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 100 mg/L Put gave the highest increments in leaf area and chlorophyll.

Treatment
100 mg/L of Pute0
Outcome
leaf area, and leaf chlorophylle0
Direction
highest incrementse0
Comparator
other applied treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the foliar application of 1500 mg/L of Chit, 2 mg/L of Brs, and 100 mg/L of Put gave the highest increments for inducing the number, length, and thickness of shoots, leaf area, and leaf chlorophyll over the other applied treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1500 mg/L Chit heightened fruit set and yield in both seasons.

Treatment
1500 mg/L of Chite0
Outcome
fruit set, fruit yielde1
Direction
heightenede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1500 mg/L of Chit, 2 mg/L of Brs, and 100 mg/L of Put”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1428 · show in text ↑
e1

“In addition, it also heightened the fruit set, fruit yield, and the fruit’s physical and chemical characteristics in both experimental seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2 mg/L Brs heightened fruit set and yield in both seasons.

Treatment
2 mg/L of Brse0
Outcome
fruit set, fruit yielde1
Direction
heightenede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1500 mg/L of Chit, 2 mg/L of Brs, and 100 mg/L of Put”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1428 · show in text ↑
e1

“In addition, it also heightened the fruit set, fruit yield, and the fruit’s physical and chemical characteristics in both experimental seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100 mg/L Put heightened fruit set and yield in both seasons.

Treatment
100 mg/L of Pute0
Outcome
fruit set, fruit yielde1
Direction
heightenede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1500 mg/L of Chit, 2 mg/L of Brs, and 100 mg/L of Put”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1428 · show in text ↑
e1

“In addition, it also heightened the fruit set, fruit yield, and the fruit’s physical and chemical characteristics in both experimental seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1500 mg/L Chit heightened fruit physical and chemical characteristics in both seasons.

Treatment
1500 mg/L of Chite0
Outcome
fruit’s physical and chemical characteristicse1
Direction
heightenede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1500 mg/L of Chit, 2 mg/L of Brs, and 100 mg/L of Put”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1428 · show in text ↑
e1

“In addition, it also heightened the fruit set, fruit yield, and the fruit’s physical and chemical characteristics in both experimental seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2 mg/L Brs heightened fruit physical and chemical characteristics in both seasons.

Treatment
2 mg/L of Brse0
Outcome
fruit’s physical and chemical characteristicse1
Direction
heightenede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1500 mg/L of Chit, 2 mg/L of Brs, and 100 mg/L of Put”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1428 · show in text ↑
e1

“In addition, it also heightened the fruit set, fruit yield, and the fruit’s physical and chemical characteristics in both experimental seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100 mg/L Put heightened fruit physical and chemical characteristics in both seasons.

Treatment
100 mg/L of Pute0
Outcome
fruit’s physical and chemical characteristicse1
Direction
heightenede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1500 mg/L of Chit, 2 mg/L of Brs, and 100 mg/L of Put”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1428 · show in text ↑
e1

“In addition, it also heightened the fruit set, fruit yield, and the fruit’s physical and chemical characteristics in both experimental seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–26 · show in text ↑

putrescine · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

other · quality: grain · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · quality: grain · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.