Paper · 2023 · Agricultural Water Management

Quantifying links between topsoil depth, plant water use, and yield in a rainfed maize field in the U. S. Midwest

Adam P. Schreiner-McGraw; Claire Baffaut

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Agricultural production in highly variable soils is a challenge, especially when those soils are shallow. Precision agriculture techniques were developed to improve yields and minimize spatial and interannual variability in profit. In the Central Claypan region of the Midwest United States, many of the precision agriculture techniques were based on the assumption that topsoil depth controlled plant available water, and therefore yield. But this assumption has not been empirically tested. In this study, we use measurements of sap flow installed on maize plants with a gradient in topsoil depth, caused by a claypan layer. We hypothesize that plants with higher water use have higher yield, plants in areas with thicker topsoil have higher water use, and soils in the areas with thicker topsoil have higher soil water content. Sap flow sensors were installed on 5 plants each at three locations with topsoil depths of 19.6 cm (shallow), 21.6 cm (medium), and 30.5 cm (deep) from June – September, 2022. An ANOVA analysis demonstrates that the average total season transpiration at the deep site (279 mm) was significantly larger than at the shallow site (151 mm), while the medium site was in the middle with transpiration not significantly different from either shallow or deep sites (218 mm). At the end of the season, the plants were harvested and total biomass and grain yield were measured. Increase in plant transpiration was significantly related to both increases in biomass and yield. Finally, we measured volumetric soil water content at each location and found higher soil water content at the site with thicker topsoil. Our results demonstrate the link between topsoil depth, soil water content, plant transpiration, and yield. These findings will help improve precision agriculture techniques in areas with highly variable topsoil thickness.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total season transpiration of maize was significantly larger at the deep-topsoil site (279 mm) than at the shallow site (151 mm)

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
deep sitee1
Outcome
total season transpiratione1
Direction
significantly largere1
Value
279 mme1
Qualifier
151 mme1
Comparator
shallow sitee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“the average total season transpiration at the deep site (279 mm) was significantly larger than at the shallow site (151 mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize transpiration at the medium-topsoil site did not differ significantly from the shallow or deep sites (218 mm)

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
medium sitee2
Outcome
transpiratione2
Direction
not significantly differente2
Value
218 mme2
Comparator
shallow or deep sitese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
e2

“the medium site was in the middle with transpiration not significantly different from either shallow or deep sites (218 mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1297 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased maize transpiration was significantly related to increased biomass and grain yield

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
biomass and yielde3
Direction
Increasee3
Comparator
plant transpiratione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
e3

“Increase in plant transpiration was significantly related to both increases in biomass and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1496 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize sites with thicker topsoil had higher volumetric soil water content

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
thicker topsoile4
Outcome
soil water contente4
Direction
highere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
e4

“found higher soil water content at the site with thicker topsoil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1634 · show in text ↑

in vitro · physiology: gas exchange · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

climate site · physiology: gas exchange · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.