Paper · 2023 · Scientific Reports

Investigating the response mechanisms of bread wheat mutants to salt stress

Hedayat Karimzadeh; Azam Borzouei; Behnam Naserian; et al.

15
claims
29
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Mutation breeding is among the most critical approaches to promoting genetic diversity when genetic diversity is narrowed for a long time using traditional breeding methods. In the current study, 15 wheat mutants created by gamma radiation and three salt-tolerant wheat cultivars were studied under no salinity stress (Karaj) and salinity stress (Yazd) during three consecutive growing seasons from 2017 to 2020 (M05 to M07 generations mutants). Results showed that salinity induced lipid peroxidation and enhanced ion leakage in all genotypes however, M6 and M15 showed the least ion leakage increment. It was also observed that the activity of antioxidant enzymes including SOD, CAT, POX, APX and GR increased with salinity; the maximum increase in antioxidant activity was belonged to M15, M09, M06 and M05. All genotypes had higher protein content in salinity stress conditions; M07 and M12 showed the lowest (1.8%) and the highest (17.3%) protein increase, respectively. Zeleny sedimentation volume increased under salinity stress conditions in all genotypes except M06, C2, C3, and M07. The result indicated that salinity stress increased wet gluten in all genotypes. M10 and M08 showed the highest (47.8%) and the lowest (4%) wet gluten increment, respectively. M06 and M11 mutants showed the lowest (6.1%) and the highest (60.7%) decrement of grain yield due to salinity stress, respectively. Finally, M04, M05, M07, M13, and M14 were known as genotypes with high grain yield in both no salinity and salinity stress conditions. In other word, these genotypes have higher yield stability. The results of the current study revealed that gamma irradiation could effectively be used to induce salinity tolerance in wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased lipid peroxidation and ion leakage in all wheat genotypes.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
lipid peroxidation and enhanced ion leakagee0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
all genotypese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity induced lipid peroxidation and enhanced ion leakage in all genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–543 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat mutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M6 and M15 showed the smallest salinity induced ion leakage increases.

Material
M6 and M15e0
Outcome
ion leakage incremente0
Direction
leaste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M6 and M15 showed the least ion leakage increment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat mutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant enzyme activities increased under salinity.

Treatment
salinitye0
Gene
SOD, CAT, POX, APX and GRe0
Outcome
activity of antioxidant enzymese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the activity of antioxidant enzymes including SOD, CAT, POX, APX and GR increased with salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat mutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M15, M09, M06 and M05 showed the greatest antioxidant activity increase.

Material
M15, M09, M06 and M05e0
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Direction
maximum increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum increase in antioxidant activity was belonged to M15, M09, M06 and M05”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat mutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All genotypes had higher protein content under salinity.

Treatment
salinity stress conditionse0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All genotypes had higher protein content in salinity stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat mutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M07 had the lowest protein increase, 1.8%.

Material
M07e0
Outcome
protein increasee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1.8%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M07 and M12 showed the lowest (1.8%) and the highest (17.3%) protein increase, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat mutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M12 had the highest protein increase, 17.3%.

Material
M12e0
Outcome
protein increasee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
17.3%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M07 and M12 showed the lowest (1.8%) and the highest (17.3%) protein increase, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat mutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased Zeleny sedimentation volume except in M06, C2, C3 and M07.

Treatment
salinity stress conditionse0
Outcome
Zeleny sedimentation volumee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
except M06, C2, C3, and M07e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zeleny sedimentation volume increased under salinity stress conditions in all genotypes except M06, C2, C3, and M07”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat mutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased wet gluten in all genotypes.

Treatment
salinity stresse0
Outcome
wet glutene0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity stress increased wet gluten in all genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat mutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M10 had the highest wet gluten increase, 47.8%.

Material
M10e0
Outcome
wet gluten incremente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
47.8%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M10 and M08 showed the highest (47.8%) and the lowest (4%) wet gluten increment, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1267 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat mutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M08 had the lowest wet gluten increase, 4%.

Material
M08e0
Outcome
wet gluten incremente0
Direction
loweste0
Value
4%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M10 and M08 showed the highest (47.8%) and the lowest (4%) wet gluten increment, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1267 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat mutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M06 had the smallest grain yield decline under salinity, 6.1%.

Material
M06e0
Treatment
salinity stresse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decremente0
Value
6.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M06 and M11 mutants showed the lowest (6.1%) and the highest (60.7%) decrement of grain yield due to salinity stress, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1399 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat mutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M11 had the largest grain yield decline under salinity, 60.7%.

Material
M11e0
Treatment
salinity stresse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decremente0
Value
60.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M06 and M11 mutants showed the lowest (6.1%) and the highest (60.7%) decrement of grain yield due to salinity stress, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1399 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat mutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M04, M05, M07, M13 and M14 had high and stable yield with and without salinity.

Material
M04, M05, M07, M13, and M14e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
both no salinity and salinity stress conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M04, M05, M07, M13, and M14 were known as genotypes with high grain yield in both no salinity and salinity stress conditions. In other word, these genotypes have higher yield stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1594 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat mutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded gamma irradiation could induce wheat salinity tolerance.

Treatment
gamma irradiatione0
Outcome
salinity tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gamma irradiation could effectively be used to induce salinity tolerance in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1724 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

48 papers: 21 positive, 27 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

salinity · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

83 papers: 10 positive, 73 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.