Paper · 2023 · Foods

Mathematical Modeling of Thin-Layer Drying Kinetics of Tomato Peels: Influence of Drying Temperature on the Energy Requirements and Extracts Quality

Mihaela Popescu; Petrica Iancu; Valentin Plesu; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
29
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Tomato drying implies high energy consumption due to the high moisture content, and limiting drying temperatures is necessary to avoid carotenoid degradation. To explain the mechanism of moisture transport through the material and to scale up the drying process, drying experiments are needed and supported by mathematical modeling. For the Rila tomato peel drying process, ten thin-layer mathematical models were formulated based on experimental data for six temperatures (50–75 °C) and validated by statistical analysis. Considering the slab geometry of the peels sample and Fick’s second law of diffusion model, the calculated effective moisture diffusivity coefficient values Deff varied between 1.01 × 10−9–1.53 × 10−9 m2/s with R2 higher than 0.9432. From the semi-theoretical models, Two-term presents the best prediction of moisture ratio with the highest R2 and lowest χ2 and RMSE values. Using the experimental data on extract quality (carotenoid content), two degradation models were formulated. Increasing the drying temperature from 50 °C to 110 °C, a degradation of 94% for lycopene and 83% for β-carotene were predicted. From the energy analysis, a specific energy consumption of 56.60 ± 0.51 kWh is necessary for hot-air drying of 1 kg of Rila tomato peel at 50 °C to avoid carotenoid degradation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Estimated moisture diffusivity ranged from 1.01 × 10−9 to 1.53 × 10−9 m2/s.

Outcome
effective moisture diffusivity coefficient values Deffe0
Value
1.01 × 10−9–1.53 × 10−9 m2/se0
Qualifier
R2 higher than 0.9432e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the calculated effective moisture diffusivity coefficient values Deff varied between 1.01 × 10−9–1.53 × 10−9 m2/s with R2 higher than 0.9432.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–756 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rila tomato peel drying process”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–372 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Two-term model best predicted moisture ratio.

Outcome
best prediction of moisture ratioe0
Qualifier
highest R2 and lowest χ2 and RMSE valuese0
Comparator
Two-terme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two-term presents the best prediction of moisture ratio with the highest R2 and lowest χ2 and RMSE values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–897 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rila tomato peel drying process”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing drying temperature predicted 94% lycopene degradation.

Treatment
Increasing the drying temperature from 50 °C to 110 °Ce0
Outcome
degradation of 94% for lycopenee0
Direction
degradatione0
Value
94%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the drying temperature from 50 °C to 110 °C, a degradation of 94% for lycopene and 83% for β-carotene were predicted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1135 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rila tomato peel drying process”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing drying temperature predicted 83% β-carotene degradation.

Treatment
Increasing the drying temperature from 50 °C to 110 °Ce0
Outcome
β-carotenee0
Direction
degradatione0
Value
83%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the drying temperature from 50 °C to 110 °C, a degradation of 94% for lycopene and 83% for β-carotene were predicted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1135 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rila tomato peel drying process”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–372 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drying one kg of Rila tomato peel at 50 °C requires 56.60 ± 0.51 kWh.

Material
Rilae0
Outcome
specific energy consumptione0
Value
56.60 ± 0.51 kWhe0
Qualifier
at 50 °C to avoid carotenoid degradatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a specific energy consumption of 56.60 ± 0.51 kWh is necessary for hot-air drying of 1 kg of Rila tomato peel at 50 °C to avoid carotenoid degradation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1313 · show in text ↑

processing · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 16 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 16 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.