Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Differential Response of Rhizosphere Microbial Diversity and Activities to System of Rice Intensification and Conventional Cultivation

B. Venkatanna; P. C. Latha; P. Akhila; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Rice holds a vital position among staple crops worldwide, serving as a primary source of essential nutrition for a significant portion of the global population. Rice production is currently plagued by several problems causing a decline in crop yields. System of Rice Intensification (SRI) is a set of farming practices designed to improve the productivity and sustainability of rice cultivation. One of the reasons for the sustainability of SRI has been attributed to enhanced below-ground soil microbial processes around the SRI plant root system. This study assessed the effect of SRI and Normal Transplanting (NTP) cultivation methods on rhizospheric soil microbial populations, phyto-hormones, soil enzyme activities under four different nitrogen (N) treatments under a station trial and in on-farms experiments farmer’s. Rhizosphere soils and root samples of SRI exhibited significantly higher microbial population, microbial diversity, phyto - hormone production, enzyme activities in station trail. Among different levels of nitrogen fertilizer applications, treatments receiving 50% organic + 50% inorganic N forms possessed significantly higher microbiota and their activities. On farm trials also exhibited similar trends as the station trial. In conclusion, the study highlights the positive effects of SRI cultivation combined with a balanced organic and inorganic nitrogen treatment on soil microbial populations and phyto-hormone production and soil enzyme activities which could have an influence of system sustainability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI rice rhizospheres had higher microbial population and diversity than normal transplanting in the station trial.

Treatment
SRIe0
Outcome
microbial population, microbial diversitye0
Direction
highere0
Setting
station traile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizosphere soils and root samples of SRI exhibited significantly higher microbial population, microbial diversity, phyto - hormone production, enzyme activities in station trail.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI rice rhizospheres had higher phyto-hormone production and enzyme activities in the station trial.

Treatment
SRIe0
Outcome
phyto - hormone production, enzyme activitiese0
Direction
highere0
Setting
station traile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizosphere soils and root samples of SRI exhibited significantly higher microbial population, microbial diversity, phyto - hormone production, enzyme activities in station trail.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Equal organic and inorganic nitrogen inputs produced higher microbiota and microbial activities than other nitrogen levels.

Treatment
50% organic + 50% inorganic N formse0
Outcome
microbiota and their activitiese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
different levels of nitrogen fertilizer applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among different levels of nitrogen fertilizer applications, treatments receiving 50% organic + 50% inorganic N forms possessed significantly higher microbiota and their activities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On-farm trials showed trends similar to the station trial.

Outcome
similar trendse0
Comparator
station triale0
Setting
On farm trialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On farm trials also exhibited similar trends as the station trial.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑

irrigation · soil: biology · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.