Paper · 2023 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

The application of a biostimulant based on Ascophyllum nodosum, fulvic acid and nutrients mitigates water deficit in soybean

Johny de Souza Silva; Rafael Santiago da Costa; Carlos Yago Araujo Campelo Rodrigues; et al.

5
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study was intended to assess the effects of a biostimulant based on Ascophyllum nodosum and fulvic acid in the mitigation of water deficit in soybean plants. The experimental design was completely randomized in a 2 x 4 + 1 factorial scheme (two application times, four proportions of biostimulant, and a control. 65 days after sowing, plant height, stem diameter, number of leaves, leaf area, gas exchange, photosynthetic pigments, membrane damage, and dry masses were measured. The proportion of 0.250 kg ha-1 before the imposition of water deficit positively increased growth, gas exchange variables, and the relative chlorophyll index (p < 0.05). Leaf water potential was less negative (p < 0.05) when applying the proportion of 0.100 kg ha-1 before or 0.250 kg ha-1 after water deficit. The damage was reduced when 0.250 to 0.500 kg ha-1 was applied before the imposition of water deficit (p < 0.05). The biostimulant mitigated the effects of water stress on soybean, mainly when applied before the imposition of stress

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 0.250 kg ha-1 of the biostimulant before water deficit positively increased soybean growth, gas exchange variables and relative chlorophyll index compared with a control.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
0.250 kg ha-1 before the imposition of water deficite1
Outcome
growth, gas exchange variables, and the relative chlorophyll indexe1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
a controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mitigates water deficit in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–124 · show in text ↑
e0

“four proportions of biostimulant, and a control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–316 · show in text ↑
e1

“The proportion of 0.250 kg ha-1 before the imposition of water deficit positively increased growth, gas exchange variables, and the relative chlorophyll index (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 0.100 kg ha-1 of the biostimulant before water deficit made soybean leaf water potential less negative than the control.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
0.100 kg ha-1 beforee2
Outcome
Leaf water potentiale2
Direction
less negativee2
Comparator
a controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mitigates water deficit in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–124 · show in text ↑
e0

“four proportions of biostimulant, and a control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–316 · show in text ↑
e2

“Leaf water potential was less negative (p < 0.05) when applying the proportion of 0.100 kg ha-1 before or 0.250 kg ha-1 after water deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–794 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 0.250 kg ha-1 of the biostimulant after water deficit made soybean leaf water potential less negative than the control.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
0.250 kg ha-1 after water deficite2
Outcome
Leaf water potentiale2
Direction
less negativee2
Comparator
a controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mitigates water deficit in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–124 · show in text ↑
e0

“four proportions of biostimulant, and a control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–316 · show in text ↑
e2

“Leaf water potential was less negative (p < 0.05) when applying the proportion of 0.100 kg ha-1 before or 0.250 kg ha-1 after water deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–794 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 0.250 to 0.500 kg ha-1 of the biostimulant before water deficit reduced soybean damage.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
0.250 to 0.500 kg ha-1e3
Outcome
damagee3
Direction
reducede3
Comparator
a controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mitigates water deficit in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–124 · show in text ↑
e0

“four proportions of biostimulant, and a control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–316 · show in text ↑
e3

“The damage was reduced when 0.250 to 0.500 kg ha-1 was applied before the imposition of water deficit (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–908 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biostimulant mitigated the effects of water stress on soybean, mainly when applied before the imposition of stress.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
biostimulante4
Outcome
effects of water stresse4
Direction
mitigatede4
Qualifier
mainly when applied before the imposition of stresse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mitigates water deficit in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–124 · show in text ↑
e4

“The biostimulant mitigated the effects of water stress on soybean, mainly when applied before the imposition of stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1028 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: gas exchange · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

45 papers: 6 positive, 39 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 20 positive, 57 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.