Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Impact of Precision Farming on Shelf Life and Organoleptic Evaluation of Banana (Musa paradisiaca L.) cv. Rajapuri

Nisarga G.; Nagesh Naik; Kantharaju V.; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Consumers choose the fruits that look good, firm and offer good flavour and have nutritive value. Producers and handlers are first concerned with appearance and textural quality along with long post harvest shelf life. Present experiment was undertaken at ICAR-AICRP on Fruits, Kittur Rani Channamma College of Horticulture, Arabhavi to know the impact of precision farming on shelf life and organoleptic evaluation of banana cv. Rajapuri during 2019-20 and 2020-21 in the laboratory, Department of Fruit Science, KRC College of Horticulture, Arabhavi, Karnataka (India). The experiment was carried out in Randomized Complete Block Design with thirteen treatments and three replications. Among all the treatments, application of 100 per cent RDF through fertigation at weekly intervals along with polythene mulching with foliar spray of micronutrient mixture and bunch nutrition recorded the highest shelf life (10.00 days) and the least physiological loss in weight (8.45 %). The analyzed results for overall acceptability were in higher preference level in T5, T7 and T9 (9.00) while minimum was noticed in T13 (7.00).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined fertigation, mulching, micronutrient and bunch nutrition treatment gave the highest shelf life of 10.00 days.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Rajapurit0
Treatment
application of 100 per cent RDF through fertigation at weekly intervals along with polythene mulching with foliar spray of micronutrient mixture and bunch nutritione0
Outcome
shelf lifee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10.00 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of 100 per cent RDF through fertigation at weekly intervals along with polythene mulching with foliar spray of micronutrient mixture and bunch nutrition recorded the highest shelf life (10.00 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–923 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana (Musa paradisiaca L.) cv. Rajapuri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment gave the least physiological loss in weight, 8.45 %.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Rajapurit0
Treatment
application of 100 per cent RDF through fertigation at weekly intervals along with polythene mulching with foliar spray of micronutrient mixture and bunch nutritione0
Outcome
physiological loss in weighte0
Direction
leaste0
Value
8.45 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of 100 per cent RDF through fertigation at weekly intervals along with polythene mulching with foliar spray of micronutrient mixture and bunch nutrition recorded the highest shelf life (10.00 days) and the least physiological loss in weight (8.45 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana (Musa paradisiaca L.) cv. Rajapuri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall acceptability was higher for T5, T7 and T9, with score 9.00.

Taxon
bananat0
Material
Rajapurit0
Treatment
T5, T7 and T9e0
Outcome
overall acceptabilitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
9.00e0

Verbatim

e0

“overall acceptability were in higher preference level in T5, T7 and T9 (9.00)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana (Musa paradisiaca L.) cv. Rajapuri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T13 had the minimum overall acceptability score, 7.00.

Taxon
bananat0
Material
Rajapurit0
Treatment
T13e0
Outcome
minimume0
Direction
minimume0
Value
7.00e0

Verbatim

e0

“minimum was noticed in T13 (7.00)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana (Musa paradisiaca L.) cv. Rajapuri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–114 · show in text ↑

poly(ethylene) · quality: postharvest · MusaPositive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · MusaPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · quality: postharvest · MusaPositive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

mulching · quality: postharvest · MusaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

micronutrient · quality: postharvest · MusaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.