Paper · 2023 · Pertanika journal of tropical agricultural science

The Effect of Zinc and Iron Applications from Different Sources to Growth, Dry Matter, and Its Uptake by Lettuce (Lactuca sativa)

Dayang Safinah Nayan; Suhaila Fouzi

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Zinc (Zn) and iron (Fe) are among the micronutrients humans need. However, the main food sources in developing countries such as Malaysia have low micronutrients, making it insufficient to supply the minimum daily requirement. Foliar fertilization is one of the most effective and safe ways to enrich important micronutrients in plants. This study investigated variations in Zn and Fe sources to evaluate the effects of individual Zn and Fe foliar applications on growth, dry matter, and nutrient uptake by lettuce (Lactuca sativa). Based on the result, the application of Zn and Fe in the form of sulfate salt showed a lower toxicity effect in terms of growth and dry matter of plants than Fe and Zn in the form of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). In terms of Zn uptake, it was found that there was a significant difference observed compared to the control, especially when 3 kg/ha Zn was applied, regardless of whether it was in the form of sulfate or EDTA. Furthermore, there was an increase in Fe uptake observed with increased Zn application. In contrast, the Fe application showed no difference in Fe intake compared to the control. It was found that there is a decrease in Zn uptake observed with increasing application of Fe rate. Sufficient Fe content is already available in the soil, and plants only take up what is needed for growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfate forms of Zn and Fe caused less growth and dry matter toxicity than EDTA forms.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
Zn and Fe in the form of sulfate salte0
Outcome
growth and dry mattere0
Direction
lower toxicitye0
Comparator
Fe and Zn in the form of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of Zn and Fe in the form of sulfate salt showed a lower toxicity effect in terms of growth and dry matter of plants than Fe and Zn in the form of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–754 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying Zn, particularly at 3 kg/ha, significantly changed lettuce Zn uptake compared with control regardless of source.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
3 kg/ha Zne0
Outcome
Zn uptakee0
Qualifier
regardless of whether it was in the form of sulfate or EDTAe0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn uptake, it was found that there was a significant difference observed compared to the control, especially when 3 kg/ha Zn was applied, regardless of whether it was in the form of sulfate or EDTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–965 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–531 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater Zn application increased Fe uptake.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
Zn applicatione0
Outcome
Fe uptakee0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was an increase in Fe uptake observed with increased Zn application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1053 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe application did not change Fe intake relative to control.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
Fe applicatione0
Outcome
Fe intakee0
Direction
no differencee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Fe application showed no difference in Fe intake compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1144 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–531 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing Fe application decreased Zn uptake.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
application of Fee0
Outcome
Zn uptakee0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there is a decrease in Zn uptake observed with increasing application of Fe rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1244 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–531 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that soil Fe is sufficient and lettuce takes up only the Fe needed for growth.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Compound
Fee0
Outcome
plants only take up what is needed for growthe0
Qualifier
Sufficient Fe content is already available in the soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sufficient Fe content is already available in the soil, and plants only take up what is needed for growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1352 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–531 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

15 papers: 7 positive, 8 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

iron atom · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

iron atom · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.