Paper · 2023 · Horticulturae

Edible Composite Coating of Chitosan and Curdlan Maintains Fruit Quality of Postharvest Cherry Tomatoes

Youwei Yu; Kejing Yan; Huanhuan Zhang; et al.

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Postharvest cherry tomatoes are prone to senescence, decay and nutrient loss during the storage period owing to microbial invasion and their own metabolism. In this work, postharvest cherry tomatoes were treated with a composite coating of 1% chitosan and 1% curdlan, and the characteristics of postharvest cherry tomatoes during storage were investigated. Compared to control samples, after 21 d of storage under ambient conditions, the cherry tomatoes treated with the chitosan and curdlan coatings showed less rottenness, less weight loss, a lower respiration rate, reduced ethylene production, lower malonaldehyde (MDA) content and reduced membrane permeability. After the samples were treated with the composite coating, the activities of free radical scavenging enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD) were maintained at higher levels; the activities of related disease-resistant enzymes such as chitinase (CHI) and glucanase (GLU) were also maintained at higher levels. The soluble solids, titratable acidity, firmness, vitamin C content, lycopene content and antioxidant activities of postharvest cherry tomatoes treated with the composite coating exhibited higher levels as well. The composite coating of chitosan and curdlan might be a potentially promising method for preserving postharvest cherry tomatoes and other fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated cherry tomatoes had less rottenness than controls after 21 days under ambient storage.

Treatment
chitosan and curdlan coatingse0
Outcome
rottennesse0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
after 21 d of storagee0
Comparator
control samplese0
Setting
ambient conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to control samples, after 21 d of storage under ambient conditions, the cherry tomatoes treated with the chitosan and curdlan coatings showed less rottenness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated cherry tomatoes had less weight loss than controls after 21 days.

Treatment
chitosan and curdlan coatingse0
Outcome
weight losse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
control samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to control samples, after 21 d of storage under ambient conditions, the cherry tomatoes treated with the chitosan and curdlan coatings showed less rottenness, less weight loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–541 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated cherry tomatoes had lower respiration rate and ethylene production than controls.

Treatment
chitosan and curdlan coatingse0
Outcome
respiration rate, reduced ethylene productione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to control samples, after 21 d of storage under ambient conditions, the cherry tomatoes treated with the chitosan and curdlan coatings showed less rottenness, less weight loss, a lower respiration rate, reduced ethylene production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–596 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated cherry tomatoes had lower malonaldehyde content and membrane permeability than controls.

Treatment
chitosan and curdlan coatingse0
Outcome
malonaldehyde (MDA) content and reduced membrane permeabilitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to control samples, after 21 d of storage under ambient conditions, the cherry tomatoes treated with the chitosan and curdlan coatings showed less rottenness, less weight loss, a lower respiration rate, reduced ethylene production, lower malonaldehyde (MDA) content and reduced membrane permeability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–665 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coating maintained higher SOD, CAT and POD activities in cherry tomatoes.

Treatment
composite coatinge0
Gene
superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD)e0
Outcome
activities of free radical scavenging enzymese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“After the samples were treated with the composite coating, the activities of free radical scavenging enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD) were maintained at higher levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–880 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coating maintained higher chitinase and glucanase activities in cherry tomatoes.

Gene
chitinase (CHI) and glucanase (GLU)e0
Outcome
activities of related disease-resistant enzymese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the activities of related disease-resistant enzymes such as chitinase (CHI) and glucanase (GLU) were also maintained at higher levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated cherry tomatoes retained higher soluble solids, titratable acidity and firmness.

Treatment
composite coatinge0
Outcome
soluble solids, titratable acidity, firmnesse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soluble solids, titratable acidity, firmness, vitamin C content, lycopene content and antioxidant activities of postharvest cherry tomatoes treated with the composite coating exhibited higher levels as well”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated cherry tomatoes retained higher vitamin C and lycopene contents and antioxidant activity.

Treatment
composite coatinge0
Outcome
vitamin C content, lycopene content and antioxidant activitiese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soluble solids, titratable acidity, firmness, vitamin C content, lycopene content and antioxidant activities of postharvest cherry tomatoes treated with the composite coating exhibited higher levels as well”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1227 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider chitosan-curdlan coating promising for preserving postharvest cherry tomatoes and other fruits.

Outcome
method for preserving postharvest cherry tomatoes and other fruitse0
Qualifier
might be a potentially promisinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The composite coating of chitosan and curdlan might be a potentially promising method for preserving postharvest cherry tomatoes and other fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1374 · show in text ↑

chitosan · physiology: oxidative · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

chitosan · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 39 positive, 1 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

chitosan · physiology: hormones · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

storage · physiology: enzyme activity · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

storage · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 31 positive, 8 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

storage · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 43 positive, 18 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.