Paper · 2023 · Semina Ciências Agrárias

In vitro control of phytopathogenic fungi and damping-off of tomato by Bacillus velezensis LABIM40 (CMRP 4489)

Paula Pinheiro Sanches de Almeida; Julia Pezarini Baptista; Allan Yukio Higashi; et al.

10
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The in vitro antagonistic activity of Bacillus velezensis LABIM40 (strain CMRP 4489) was assessed against Alternaria linariae, Botryotinia squamosa, Colletotrichum lindemuthianum, Gibberella zeae, and Rhizoctonia solani. An experiment was conducted using treated seeds under growth chamber conditions to determine the impact of various LABIM40 formulations on tomato seedling growth and the biocontrol of damping-off caused by R. solani. The treatments included the use of LABIM40 cell suspension, LABIM40 cell-free supernatant (CFS), 10 times concentrated CFS (10× CFS), commercial products based on Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (CP_1) and Bacillus subtilis (CP_2), and water. The effects of these products were assessed on tomato seedlings grown in sterile substrate or substrate inoculated with R. solani. In a dual culture test, B. velezensis LABIM40 inhibited the mycelial growth of the aforementioned fungal pathogens by 46.6%, 67.4%, 64.7%, 49.0%, and 54.4%, respectively. The minimum inhibitory concentration against each fungus was determined using varying concentrations of CFS in potato dextrose agar medium, followed by a regression analysis of mycelial growth inhibition. Except for A. linariae, the logarithmic model provided the best fit in all cases. Tomato seedlings from seeds treated with 10× CFS in inoculated substrate exhibited a survival rate 57% higher than that exhibited by the control treatment. However, no growth promotion was observed in tomato plants from seeds treated with LABIM40 cells or its CFS metabolites. In summary, these findings highlight the antagonistic activity of B. velezensis LABIM40 against A. linariae, B. squamosa, C. lindemuthianum, G. zeae, and R. solani, as demonstrated by dual culture and CFS diffusion tests. This suggests its potential as a biocontrol agent for damping-off in tomatoes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. velezensis LABIM40 inhibited Alternaria linariae mycelial growth by 46.6%.

Treatment
B. velezensis LABIM40e0
Interactor
Alternaria linariaeAlternaria linariaee1pathogen
Second interactor
B. velezensis LABIM40Bacillus velezensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mycelial growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
46.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · Second interactorMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. velezensis LABIM40 inhibited the mycelial growth of the aforementioned fungal pathogens by 46.6%, 67.4%, 64.7%, 49.0%, and 54.4%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“Alternaria linariae, Botryotinia squamosa, Colletotrichum lindemuthianum, Gibberella zeae, and Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–219 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LABIM40 inhibited Botryotinia squamosa mycelial growth by 67.4%.

Treatment
B. velezensis LABIM40e0
Interactor
Botryotinia squamosaBotrytis squamosae1pathogen
Second interactor
B. velezensis LABIM40Bacillus velezensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mycelial growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
67.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis squamosa
Botrytis squamosa · InteractorRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · Second interactorMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. velezensis LABIM40 inhibited the mycelial growth of the aforementioned fungal pathogens by 46.6%, 67.4%, 64.7%, 49.0%, and 54.4%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“Alternaria linariae, Botryotinia squamosa, Colletotrichum lindemuthianum, Gibberella zeae, and Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–219 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LABIM40 inhibited Colletotrichum lindemuthianum mycelial growth by 64.7%.

Treatment
B. velezensis LABIM40e0
Interactor
Colletotrichum lindemuthianumColletotrichum lindemuthianume1pathogen
Second interactor
B. velezensis LABIM40Bacillus velezensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mycelial growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
64.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum lindemuthianum
Colletotrichum lindemuthianum · InteractorDavid B. Langston, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · Second interactorMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. velezensis LABIM40 inhibited the mycelial growth of the aforementioned fungal pathogens by 46.6%, 67.4%, 64.7%, 49.0%, and 54.4%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“Colletotrichum lindemuthianum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LABIM40 inhibited Gibberella zeae mycelial growth by 49.0%.

Treatment
B. velezensis LABIM40e0
Interactor
Gibberella zeaeFusarium graminearume1pathogen
Second interactor
B. velezensis LABIM40Bacillus velezensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mycelial growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
49.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · Second interactorMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. velezensis LABIM40 inhibited the mycelial growth of the aforementioned fungal pathogens by 46.6%, 67.4%, 64.7%, 49.0%, and 54.4%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gibberella zeae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LABIM40 inhibited Rhizoctonia solani mycelial growth by 54.4%.

Treatment
B. velezensis LABIM40e0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Second interactor
B. velezensis LABIM40Bacillus velezensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mycelial growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
54.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · Second interactorMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. velezensis LABIM40 inhibited the mycelial growth of the aforementioned fungal pathogens by 46.6%, 67.4%, 64.7%, 49.0%, and 54.4%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–219 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The logarithmic model gave the best fit for all tested fungi except A. linariae.

Outcome
best fite0
Comparator
A. linariaee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Except for A. linariae, the logarithmic model provided the best fit in all cases.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato seedlings from seeds treated with 10× CFS in inoculated substrate had 57% higher survival than controls.

Organ / stage
seedlingse0
Treatment
10× CFSe0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus velezensis LABIM40Bacillus velezensist0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
survival ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
57%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0
Setting
inoculated substratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · Second interactorMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato seedlings from seeds treated with 10× CFS in inoculated substrate exhibited a survival rate 57% higher than that exhibited by the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1420 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculated with R. solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–805 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bacillus velezensis LABIM40 (CMRP 4489)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LABIM40 cells did not promote tomato growth.

Treatment
LABIM40 cellse0
Interactor
LABIM40e0biocontrol_agentt0
Outcome
growth promotione0
Direction
no growth promotione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no growth promotion was observed in tomato plants from seeds treated with LABIM40 cells or its CFS metabolites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bacillus velezensis LABIM40”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LABIM40 CFS metabolites did not promote tomato growth.

Treatment
CFS metabolitese0
Interactor
LABIM40e0biocontrol_agentt0
Outcome
growth promotione0
Direction
no growth promotione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no growth promotion was observed in tomato plants from seeds treated with LABIM40 cells or its CFS metabolites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bacillus velezensis LABIM40”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The findings suggest LABIM40 has potential to control tomato damping-off.

Interactor
B. velezensis LABIM40Bacillus velezensise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
potential as a biocontrol agent for damping-offe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · InteractorMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This suggests its potential as a biocontrol agent for damping-off in tomatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1764–1842 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. velezensis LABIM40 against A. linariae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1649 · show in text ↑

metabolite · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

pathogen product · Rhizoctonia solani · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

pathogen product · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.