Paper · 2011 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Efficacy of Antifungal Metabolites of Bacillus spp. for Controlling Tomato Damping-off Caused by Pythium aphanidermatum

Warin Intana; Prakong Yenjit; Taksin Suwanno; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A total of 4 strains of bacteria were isolated from the leaf surface of the rambutan using a tissue transplanting technique. They were characterized, by a dual culture test, for their efficacy to inhibit mycelial growth of Pythium aphanidermatum, a causal agent of the damping-off on tomato. All 4 strains significantly inhibited mycelial growth of P. aphanidermatum on potato dextrose agar (PDA) at room temperature (27 °C). B-NST-02 and B-NST-03 gave values of inhibition of 62.0 % and 57.5 %, respectively. All strains were identified as Bacillus spp. Antifungal metabolites extracted from all 4 strains were tested at 1,000 mg/l. Tomato seedlings treated in the laboratory with metabolites from B-NST-03 and B-NST-02 showed germination of 85.5 % and 82.0 %, respectively. Under glasshouse conditions, seedling treated with metabolites from B-NST-03 and B-NST-02 provided seed germination rates were 92.5 % and 92.0 %, respectively, while the controls treated with either sterile water or 2 % methanol had only 28.0 % and 26.5 % seed germination rates, respectively. In P. aphanidermatum viability test, mycelia of P. aphanidermatum treated with antifungal metabolites from 4 strains of Bacillus spp. showed no visible growth, while the control with sterile water or 2 % methanol, mycelia of P. aphanidermatum rapidly grew and covered the whole surface of the PDA in the Petri dish within 5 days.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All four Bacillus strains significantly inhibited Pythium mycelial growth in dual culture.

Interactor
P. aphanidermatumPythium aphanidermatume0pathogen
Outcome
mycelial growth of P. aphanidermatume0
Direction
inhibitede0
Setting
potato dextrose agar (PDA)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Damping-off Caused by Pythium aphanidermatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“All 4 strains significantly inhibited mycelial growth of P. aphanidermatum on potato dextrose agar (PDA) at room temperature (27 °C).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–425 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B-NST-02 inhibited Pythium growth by 62.0%.

Material
B-NST-02e0
Interactor
Pythium aphanidermatumPythium aphanidermatumt0pathogen
Outcome
values of inhibitione0
Value
62.0 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Damping-off Caused by Pythium aphanidermatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“B-NST-02 and B-NST-03 gave values of inhibition of 62.0 % and 57.5 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–509 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B-NST-03 inhibited Pythium growth by 57.5%.

Material
B-NST-03e0
Interactor
Pythium aphanidermatumPythium aphanidermatumt0pathogen
Outcome
values of inhibitione0
Value
57.5 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Damping-off Caused by Pythium aphanidermatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“B-NST-02 and B-NST-03 gave values of inhibition of 62.0 % and 57.5 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–509 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All four antagonistic strains were identified as Bacillus spp.

Interactor
Bacillus spp.e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
identified as Bacillus spp.e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Damping-off Caused by Pythium aphanidermatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“All strains were identified as Bacillus spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B-NST-03 metabolites gave 85.5% tomato germination in the laboratory.

Treatment
metabolites from B-NST-03e0
Outcome
germinatione0
Value
85.5 %e0
Setting
laboratorye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tomato seedlings treated in the laboratory with metabolites from B-NST-03 and B-NST-02 showed germination of 85.5 % and 82.0 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–775 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B-NST-02 metabolites gave 82.0% tomato germination in the laboratory.

Treatment
B-NST-02e0
Outcome
germinatione0
Value
82.0 %e0
Setting
laboratorye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato seedlings treated in the laboratory with metabolites from B-NST-03 and B-NST-02 showed germination of 85.5 % and 82.0 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–775 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B-NST-03 metabolites gave 92.5% tomato seed germination in the glasshouse, versus 28.0% with sterile water.

Treatment
metabolites from B-NST-03e0
Outcome
seed germination ratese0
Direction
onlye0
Value
92.5 %e0
Qualifier
28.0 %e0
Comparator
sterile watere0
Setting
glasshouse conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under glasshouse conditions, seedling treated with metabolites from B-NST-03 and B-NST-02 provided seed germination rates were 92.5 % and 92.0 %, respectively, while the controls treated with either sterile water or 2 % methanol had only 28.0 % and 26.5 % seed germination rates, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–1069 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B-NST-02 metabolites gave 92.0% tomato seed germination in the glasshouse, versus 26.5% with methanol.

Treatment
B-NST-02e0
Outcome
seed germination ratese0
Direction
onlye0
Value
92.0 %e0
Qualifier
26.5 %e0
Comparator
2 % methanole0
Setting
glasshouse conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under glasshouse conditions, seedling treated with metabolites from B-NST-03 and B-NST-02 provided seed germination rates were 92.5 % and 92.0 %, respectively, while the controls treated with either sterile water or 2 % methanol had only 28.0 % and 26.5 % seed germination rates, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–1069 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metabolites from all four Bacillus strains prevented visible Pythium mycelial growth, whereas control mycelia covered the PDA within five days.

Treatment
antifungal metabolites from 4 strains of Bacillus spp.e0
Interactor
P. aphanidermatumPythium aphanidermatume0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus spp.e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mycelia of P. aphanidermatume0
Direction
no visible growthe0
Comparator
sterile water or 2 % methanole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Damping-off Caused by Pythium aphanidermatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“mycelia of P. aphanidermatum treated with antifungal metabolites from 4 strains of Bacillus spp. showed no visible growth, while the control with sterile water or 2 % methanol, mycelia of P. aphanidermatum rapidly grew and covered the whole surface of the PDA in the Petri dish within 5 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1399 · show in text ↑

metabolite · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.