Paper · 2023 · Al-Azhar Journal of Agricultural Research

Mitigation adverse effects of salt stress on Prunus persica L Florida prince peach cultivar

Hosny Shehata; G. A. Abdrabboh

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Background and aim: Many horticultural plants, especially fruit trees, can have severely reduced growth, productivity, and fruit quality due to salinity. Methods:Under salt circumstances, soil applications of low spray irrigation systems, humic acid, Uni-sal, and mulching resulted in much higher vegetative growth than control, including shoot length, leaf number, and leaf area in shoots. Results: The maximum of photosynthetic pigments were obtained when using sprinkler irrigation systems and Uni-sal at a rate of 6 L/feddan in comparison with control and other treatments. All soil application treatments under salinity conditions led to a decreased proline content in the leaves of every peach tested cultivar in contrast to the control. Soil applications significantly increased potassium, calcium, magnesium, iron, and zinc while causing a decrease in chloride content as compared with control. The maximum values of fruit weight, fruit size, fruit volume, T.S.S.%, ascorbic acid, T.S.S/acidity ratio, and anthocyanin, while these treatments led to a decrease in total acidity percent when the trees received Uni-sal at a rate of 6 L/feddan and sprinkler water system, compared with control. The highest yield was obtained when both Uni-sal at a rate of 6 L/feddan and the sprinkler water system were used. Conclusion: The Florida Prince Peach cultivar may benefit from soil application to increase growth, productivity, and fruit quality in the face of salt stress under climate change condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under salinity, soil applications increased vegetative growth (shoot length, leaf number, leaf area) above control.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicat0
Organ / stage
shootse1
Treatment
soil applications of low spray irrigation systems, humic acid, Uni-sal, and mulchinge1
Outcome
vegetative growthe1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
Under salt circumstancese1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prunus persica L Florida prince peach cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under salt circumstances, soil applications of low spray irrigation systems, humic acid, Uni-sal, and mulching resulted in much higher vegetative growth than control, including shoot length, leaf number, and leaf area in shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprinkler irrigation with Uni-sal at 6 L/feddan gave the maximum photosynthetic pigments compared with control and other treatments.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicat0
Treatment
sprinkler irrigation systems and Uni-sal at a rate of 6 L/feddane1
Outcome
photosynthetic pigmentse1
Direction
maximume1
Comparator
control and other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prunus persica L Florida prince peach cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum of photosynthetic pigments were obtained when using sprinkler irrigation systems and Uni-sal at a rate of 6 L/feddan in comparison with control and other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application treatments under salinity decreased leaf proline content compared with control.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicat0
Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
soil application treatments under salinity conditionse1
Outcome
proline contente1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prunus persica L Florida prince peach cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“All soil application treatments under salinity conditions led to a decreased proline content in the leaves of every peach tested cultivar in contrast to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–742 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil applications significantly increased leaf potassium, calcium and magnesium compared with control.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicat0
Treatment
Soil applicationse1
Outcome
potassium, calcium, magnesiume1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prunus persica L Florida prince peach cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil applications significantly increased potassium, calcium, magnesium, iron, and zinc while causing a decrease in chloride content as compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil applications significantly increased leaf iron and zinc compared with control.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicat0
Treatment
Soil applicationse1
Outcome
iron, and zince1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prunus persica L Florida prince peach cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil applications significantly increased potassium, calcium, magnesium, iron, and zinc while causing a decrease in chloride content as compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil applications decreased leaf chloride content compared with control.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicat0
Treatment
Soil applicationse1
Outcome
chloride contente1
Direction
decreasee1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prunus persica L Florida prince peach cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil applications significantly increased potassium, calcium, magnesium, iron, and zinc while causing a decrease in chloride content as compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uni-sal at 6 L/feddan with sprinkler irrigation gave maximum fruit weight, fruit size and fruit volume compared with control.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicat0
Treatment
Uni-sal at a rate of 6 L/feddan and sprinkler water systeme1
Outcome
fruit weight, fruit size, fruit volumee1
Direction
maximume1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prunus persica L Florida prince peach cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum values of fruit weight, fruit size, fruit volume, T.S.S.%, ascorbic acid, T.S.S/acidity ratio, and anthocyanin, while these treatments led to a decrease in total acidity percent when the trees received Uni-sal at a rate of 6 L/feddan and sprinkler water system, compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uni-sal at 6 L/feddan with sprinkler irrigation gave maximum TSS, ascorbic acid and TSS/acidity ratio compared with control.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicat0
Treatment
Uni-sal at a rate of 6 L/feddan and sprinkler water systeme1
Outcome
T.S.S.%, ascorbic acid, T.S.S/acidity ratioe1
Direction
maximume1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prunus persica L Florida prince peach cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum values of fruit weight, fruit size, fruit volume, T.S.S.%, ascorbic acid, T.S.S/acidity ratio, and anthocyanin, while these treatments led to a decrease in total acidity percent when the trees received Uni-sal at a rate of 6 L/feddan and sprinkler water system, compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uni-sal at 6 L/feddan with sprinkler irrigation gave maximum anthocyanin compared with control.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicat0
Treatment
Uni-sal at a rate of 6 L/feddan and sprinkler water systeme1
Outcome
anthocyanine1
Direction
maximume1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prunus persica L Florida prince peach cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum values of fruit weight, fruit size, fruit volume, T.S.S.%, ascorbic acid, T.S.S/acidity ratio, and anthocyanin, while these treatments led to a decrease in total acidity percent when the trees received Uni-sal at a rate of 6 L/feddan and sprinkler water system, compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uni-sal at 6 L/feddan with sprinkler irrigation decreased total acidity percent compared with control.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicat0
Treatment
Uni-sal at a rate of 6 L/feddan and sprinkler water systeme1
Outcome
total acidity percente1
Direction
decreasee1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prunus persica L Florida prince peach cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum values of fruit weight, fruit size, fruit volume, T.S.S.%, ascorbic acid, T.S.S/acidity ratio, and anthocyanin, while these treatments led to a decrease in total acidity percent when the trees received Uni-sal at a rate of 6 L/feddan and sprinkler water system, compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uni-sal at 6 L/feddan with sprinkler irrigation gave the highest yield.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicat0
Treatment
Uni-sal at a rate of 6 L/feddan and the sprinkler water systeme1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Prunus persica L Florida prince peach cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest yield was obtained when both Uni-sal at a rate of 6 L/feddan and the sprinkler water system were used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1313 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Florida Prince peach may benefit from soil application under salt stress and climate change to increase growth, productivity and fruit quality.

Taxon
Florida Prince Peache1
Treatment
soil applicatione1
Outcome
growth, productivity, and fruit qualitye1
Qualifier
under climate change conditione1

Verbatim

e1

“The Florida Prince Peach cultivar may benefit from soil application to increase growth, productivity, and fruit quality in the face of salt stress under climate change condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1504 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

55 papers: 31 positive, 24 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

salinity · physiology: osmolytes · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · physiology: osmolytes · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

mulching · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

application · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 26 positive, 9 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

irrigation · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 24 positive, 19 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.