Paper · 2021 · Acta Horticulturae

Managing orchard floor for saving water in a late ripening peach cultivar: a preliminary result

L. Gaeta; A.M. Amendolagine; D. Di Gennaro; et al.

19
claims
50
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Low humidity conditions occurring in Southern Italy till late summer allow the cultivation of late ripening peach cultivars. However, they are highly water demanding thus the increase of water use efficiency not affecting fruit production and quality is crucial. Four different agronomic managements were evaluated on ‘Redcall’ peach: completely tilled (T), mulched with a plastic film reducing soil evaporation and increasing diffuse light (M), mulching with a Leguminosae cover crop flattened after peach fruit set (F), tilled plot supplying the same volume of M that was supposed to be lower than T (S). Water was supplied till the field capacity when soil humidity reached the threshold of the readily available water. During fruit cell expansion S had leaf net photosynthesis (Pn), stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration (Tr) as well as stem water potential (Ψs) lower than T. Interestingly M and F showed the same low Ψs of S at 120 and 135 DAFB, respectively even if their Pn, gs and Tr were higher than S and comparable with T. Under water stress this peach cultivar behaved in a “conservative” way maintaining its Ψs above a safe threshold against embolism through stomata closure, thus reducing Pn. Few days before the harvest F drastically reduced gas exchanges, fruit growth, Ψs and soil water content albeit it received the same water volume of T. The increase of soil evaporation would be attributable to the disruption of the flattened crop as well as to the onset of soil cracking. Fruit production and size were affected by water stress in S and F, while M showed the highest productivity supplying 43% less water. The “conservative” behaviour of peach suggested that in certain conditions Ψs could not represent the real plant water status. Mulching with plastic film could be a promising practice in semi-arid conditions while the flattening practice should be refined since leaf functionality and fruit growth started to decrease only 15 days before the harvest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tilled plot with the same water volume as M had lower leaf net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and transpiration than the completely tilled control during fruit cell expansion.

Organ / stage
fruit cell expansione2
Treatment
tilled plot supplying the same volume of Me1
Outcome
leaf net photosynthesis (Pn), stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration (Tr)e2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
completely tilled (T)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low humidity conditions occurring in Southern Italy till late summer allow the cultivation of late ripening peach cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“completely tilled (T), mulched with a plastic film reducing soil evaporation and increasing diffuse light (M), mulching with a Leguminosae cover crop flattened after peach fruit set (F), tilled plot supplying the same volume of M that was supposed to be lower than T (S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–605 · show in text ↑
e2

“During fruit cell expansion S had leaf net photosynthesis (Pn), stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration (Tr) as well as stem water potential (Ψs) lower than T”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tilled plot with the same water volume as M had lower stem water potential than the completely tilled control during fruit cell expansion.

Organ / stage
fruit cell expansione2
Treatment
tilled plot supplying the same volume of Me1
Outcome
stem water potential (Ψs)e2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
completely tilled (T)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low humidity conditions occurring in Southern Italy till late summer allow the cultivation of late ripening peach cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“completely tilled (T), mulched with a plastic film reducing soil evaporation and increasing diffuse light (M), mulching with a Leguminosae cover crop flattened after peach fruit set (F), tilled plot supplying the same volume of M that was supposed to be lower than T (S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–605 · show in text ↑
e2

“During fruit cell expansion S had leaf net photosynthesis (Pn), stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration (Tr) as well as stem water potential (Ψs) lower than T”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching with plastic film showed the same low stem water potential as the tilled plot with the same water volume at 120 DAFB.

Treatment
mulched with a plastic filme1
Outcome
Ψse2
Direction
lowe2
Value
120e2
Qualifier
120 and 135 DAFB, respectivelye2
Comparator
tilled plot supplying the same volume of Me1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low humidity conditions occurring in Southern Italy till late summer allow the cultivation of late ripening peach cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“completely tilled (T), mulched with a plastic film reducing soil evaporation and increasing diffuse light (M), mulching with a Leguminosae cover crop flattened after peach fruit set (F), tilled plot supplying the same volume of M that was supposed to be lower than T (S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–605 · show in text ↑
e2

“Interestingly M and F showed the same low Ψs of S at 120 and 135 DAFB, respectively even if their Pn, gs and Tr were higher than S and comparable with T”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Leguminosae cover crop flattened after fruit set showed the same low stem water potential as the tilled plot with the same water volume at 135 DAFB.

Treatment
mulching with a Leguminosae cover crop flattened after peach fruit sete1
Outcome
Ψse2
Direction
lowe2
Value
135e2
Qualifier
120 and 135 DAFB, respectivelye2
Comparator
tilled plot supplying the same volume of Me1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low humidity conditions occurring in Southern Italy till late summer allow the cultivation of late ripening peach cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“completely tilled (T), mulched with a plastic film reducing soil evaporation and increasing diffuse light (M), mulching with a Leguminosae cover crop flattened after peach fruit set (F), tilled plot supplying the same volume of M that was supposed to be lower than T (S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–605 · show in text ↑
e2

“Interestingly M and F showed the same low Ψs of S at 120 and 135 DAFB, respectively even if their Pn, gs and Tr were higher than S and comparable with T”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching with plastic film had higher leaf net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and transpiration than the tilled plot with the same water volume.

Treatment
mulched with a plastic filme1
Outcome
Pn, gs and Tre2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
tilled plot supplying the same volume of Me1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low humidity conditions occurring in Southern Italy till late summer allow the cultivation of late ripening peach cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“completely tilled (T), mulched with a plastic film reducing soil evaporation and increasing diffuse light (M), mulching with a Leguminosae cover crop flattened after peach fruit set (F), tilled plot supplying the same volume of M that was supposed to be lower than T (S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–605 · show in text ↑
e2

“Interestingly M and F showed the same low Ψs of S at 120 and 135 DAFB, respectively even if their Pn, gs and Tr were higher than S and comparable with T”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Leguminosae cover crop flattened after fruit set had higher leaf net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and transpiration than the tilled plot with the same water volume.

Treatment
mulching with a Leguminosae cover crop flattened after peach fruit sete1
Outcome
Pn, gs and Tre2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
tilled plot supplying the same volume of Me1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low humidity conditions occurring in Southern Italy till late summer allow the cultivation of late ripening peach cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“completely tilled (T), mulched with a plastic film reducing soil evaporation and increasing diffuse light (M), mulching with a Leguminosae cover crop flattened after peach fruit set (F), tilled plot supplying the same volume of M that was supposed to be lower than T (S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–605 · show in text ↑
e2

“Interestingly M and F showed the same low Ψs of S at 120 and 135 DAFB, respectively even if their Pn, gs and Tr were higher than S and comparable with T”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching with plastic film had leaf net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and transpiration comparable with the completely tilled control.

Treatment
mulched with a plastic filme1
Outcome
Pn, gs and Tre2
Direction
comparablee2
Comparator
completely tilled (T)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low humidity conditions occurring in Southern Italy till late summer allow the cultivation of late ripening peach cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“completely tilled (T), mulched with a plastic film reducing soil evaporation and increasing diffuse light (M), mulching with a Leguminosae cover crop flattened after peach fruit set (F), tilled plot supplying the same volume of M that was supposed to be lower than T (S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–605 · show in text ↑
e2

“Interestingly M and F showed the same low Ψs of S at 120 and 135 DAFB, respectively even if their Pn, gs and Tr were higher than S and comparable with T”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Leguminosae cover crop flattened after fruit set had leaf net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and transpiration comparable with the completely tilled control.

Treatment
mulching with a Leguminosae cover crop flattened after peach fruit sete1
Outcome
Pn, gs and Tre2
Direction
comparablee2
Comparator
completely tilled (T)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low humidity conditions occurring in Southern Italy till late summer allow the cultivation of late ripening peach cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“completely tilled (T), mulched with a plastic film reducing soil evaporation and increasing diffuse light (M), mulching with a Leguminosae cover crop flattened after peach fruit set (F), tilled plot supplying the same volume of M that was supposed to be lower than T (S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–605 · show in text ↑
e2

“Interestingly M and F showed the same low Ψs of S at 120 and 135 DAFB, respectively even if their Pn, gs and Tr were higher than S and comparable with T”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Leguminosae cover crop flattened after fruit set drastically reduced gas exchanges, fruit growth and stem water potential before harvest despite the same water volume as the control.

Treatment
mulching with a Leguminosae cover crop flattened after peach fruit sete1
Outcome
gas exchanges, fruit growth, Ψse2
Direction
drastically reducede2
Comparator
completely tilled (T)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low humidity conditions occurring in Southern Italy till late summer allow the cultivation of late ripening peach cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“completely tilled (T), mulched with a plastic film reducing soil evaporation and increasing diffuse light (M), mulching with a Leguminosae cover crop flattened after peach fruit set (F), tilled plot supplying the same volume of M that was supposed to be lower than T (S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–605 · show in text ↑
e2

“Few days before the harvest F drastically reduced gas exchanges, fruit growth, Ψs and soil water content albeit it received the same water volume of T”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1361 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Leguminosae cover crop flattened after fruit set drastically reduced soil water content before harvest despite the same water volume as the control.

Treatment
mulching with a Leguminosae cover crop flattened after peach fruit sete1
Outcome
soil water contente2
Direction
drastically reducede2
Comparator
completely tilled (T)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low humidity conditions occurring in Southern Italy till late summer allow the cultivation of late ripening peach cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“completely tilled (T), mulched with a plastic film reducing soil evaporation and increasing diffuse light (M), mulching with a Leguminosae cover crop flattened after peach fruit set (F), tilled plot supplying the same volume of M that was supposed to be lower than T (S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–605 · show in text ↑
e2

“Few days before the harvest F drastically reduced gas exchanges, fruit growth, Ψs and soil water content albeit it received the same water volume of T”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1361 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased soil evaporation is attributable to the disruption of the flattened cover crop and to soil cracking.

Outcome
increase of soil evaporatione1
Qualifier
disruption of the flattened crop as well as to the onset of soil crackinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low humidity conditions occurring in Southern Italy till late summer allow the cultivation of late ripening peach cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase of soil evaporation would be attributable to the disruption of the flattened crop as well as to the onset of soil cracking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching with plastic film gave the highest peach productivity while supplying 43% less water.

Treatment
mulched with a plastic filme1
Outcome
productivitye2
Direction
higheste2
Value
43%e2
Qualifier
supplying 43% less watere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low humidity conditions occurring in Southern Italy till late summer allow the cultivation of late ripening peach cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“completely tilled (T), mulched with a plastic film reducing soil evaporation and increasing diffuse light (M), mulching with a Leguminosae cover crop flattened after peach fruit set (F), tilled plot supplying the same volume of M that was supposed to be lower than T (S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–605 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fruit production and size were affected by water stress in S and F, while M showed the highest productivity supplying 43% less water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress in the tilled plot with the same water volume as M affected peach fruit production and size.

Treatment
water stress in Se2
Outcome
Fruit production and sizee2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low humidity conditions occurring in Southern Italy till late summer allow the cultivation of late ripening peach cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fruit production and size were affected by water stress in S and F, while M showed the highest productivity supplying 43% less water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching with a Leguminosae cover crop flattened after fruit set affected peach fruit production and size under water stress.

Treatment
mulching with a Leguminosae cover crop flattened after peach fruit sete1
Outcome
Fruit production and sizee2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low humidity conditions occurring in Southern Italy till late summer allow the cultivation of late ripening peach cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“completely tilled (T), mulched with a plastic film reducing soil evaporation and increasing diffuse light (M), mulching with a Leguminosae cover crop flattened after peach fruit set (F), tilled plot supplying the same volume of M that was supposed to be lower than T (S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–605 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fruit production and size were affected by water stress in S and F, while M showed the highest productivity supplying 43% less water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1632 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem water potential may not represent the real plant water status of peach in certain conditions.

Outcome
Ψse1
Qualifier
could not represent the real plant water statuse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low humidity conditions occurring in Southern Italy till late summer allow the cultivation of late ripening peach cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“suggested that in certain conditions Ψs could not represent the real plant water status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1759 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peach maintained its stem water potential above a safe embolism threshold through stomatal closure, thereby reducing leaf net photosynthesis.

Outcome
Pne1
Qualifier
maintaining its Ψs above a safe threshold against embolism through stomata closuree1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low humidity conditions occurring in Southern Italy till late summer allow the cultivation of late ripening peach cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“maintaining its Ψs above a safe threshold against embolism through stomata closure, thus reducing Pn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1209 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching with plastic film could be a promising practice in semi-arid conditions.

Treatment
Mulching with plastic filme1
Outcome
a promising practicee1
Qualifier
in semi-arid conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low humidity conditions occurring in Southern Italy till late summer allow the cultivation of late ripening peach cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mulching with plastic film could be a promising practice in semi-arid conditions while the flattening practice should be refined since leaf functionality and fruit growth started to decrease only 15 days before the harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1761–1983 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The flattening practice for the cover crop should be refined.

Outcome
flattening practicee1
Qualifier
should be refinede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low humidity conditions occurring in Southern Italy till late summer allow the cultivation of late ripening peach cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mulching with plastic film could be a promising practice in semi-arid conditions while the flattening practice should be refined since leaf functionality and fruit growth started to decrease only 15 days before the harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1761–1983 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf functionality and fruit growth decreased only 15 days before harvest.

Outcome
leaf functionality and fruit growthe1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
15 days before the harveste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low humidity conditions occurring in Southern Italy till late summer allow the cultivation of late ripening peach cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mulching with plastic film could be a promising practice in semi-arid conditions while the flattening practice should be refined since leaf functionality and fruit growth started to decrease only 15 days before the harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1761–1983 · show in text ↑

mulching · physiology: photosynthesis · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

cover crop · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

mulching · soil: physics · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

drought · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 2 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

mulching · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

mulching · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.