Abstract
Tamil Nadu occupies 4.7 lakh ha of salt affected soils, in which 3.0 lakh ha area under inland and 1.7 lakh ha under coastal. Among the 3.0 lakh inland salt affected soils, 2.0 lakh ha occupy alkalinity and 1.0 lakh ha under salinity. In Trichirappalli 18,155 ha comes under alkalinity problem. Guava is one of the commercial fruit crop comes well under salt affected soils. The main problem in yield reduction in guava is due to micronutrient deficiency. Hence the present investigation was conducted at Horticultural College and Research Institute for Women, Tiruchirappalli during 2020-2021 in clay loam texture with pH -9.23, ESP-36.52%. . The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design (RBD) on guava cv. Lucknow -49 planted at 3 x 2mspacing with seven treatments replicated three and ten number of plants per replication were taken. The treatments comprised of T1 – Control, T2 – Recommended Dose of Fertilizers alone (300:150:150 g NPK/tree), T3 – RDF + 100% MN Mixture TN Govt. rec.@500g/tree,T4 – RDF + 125% MN Mixture TN Govt. rec.@500g/tree ,T5 – RDF + 100% Enriched FYM TN Govt. rec.@500g/tree,T6 - RDF + 125% Enriched FYM TN Govt. rec.@500g/tree,T7- RDF +1% foliar spray of 100% MN Mixture Tamil Nadu Government (II approximation) rec .The foliar application of these treatments was made at three times of new flush, 30 and 70 days after flowering. The results revealed that the application of RDF + 100% Enriched FYM TN Govt. rec.@500g/tree recorded highest 50% flowering (33.6%), fruit retention (51.5%), highest yield (42.3 t/ha) and quality parameters like TSS (12.80brix) and lowest acidity (0.42%) followed by treatment RDF + 125% MN Mixture TN Govt. rec.@500g/tree and the same treatment recorded the BC ratio of 3.64 while the control with BC ratio of 2.75.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
RDF plus 100% enriched FYM produced 50% flowering of 33.6%.
- Taxon
- Guava
Psidium guajavat0 - Material
- Lucknow 49t0
- Treatment
- RDF + 100% Enriched FYM TN Govt. rec.@500g/treee0
- Outcome
- 50% floweringe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 33.6%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results revealed that the application of RDF + 100% Enriched FYM TN Govt. rec.@500g/tree recorded highest 50% flowering (33.6%), fruit retention (51.5%), highest yield (42.3 t/ha) and quality parameters like TSS (12.80brix) and lowest acidity (0.42%) followed by treatment RDF + 125% MN Mixture TN Govt. rec.@500g/tree and the same treatment recorded the BC ratio of 3.64 while the control with BC ratio of 2.75.”
t0“Yield and Quality of Guava cv Lucknow 49 in Sodic Soil”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF plus 100% enriched FYM produced fruit retention of 51.5%.
- Taxon
- GuavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- Lucknow 49t0
- Treatment
- RDF + 100% Enriched FYM TN Govt. rec.@500g/treee0
- Outcome
- fruit retentione0
- Value
- 51.5%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results revealed that the application of RDF + 100% Enriched FYM TN Govt. rec.@500g/tree recorded highest 50% flowering (33.6%), fruit retention (51.5%), highest yield (42.3 t/ha) and quality parameters like TSS (12.80brix) and lowest acidity (0.42%) followed by treatment RDF + 125% MN Mixture TN Govt. rec.@500g/tree and the same treatment recorded the BC ratio of 3.64 while the control with BC ratio of 2.75.”
t0“Yield and Quality of Guava cv Lucknow 49 in Sodic Soil”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF plus 100% enriched FYM produced yield of 42.3 t/ha.
- Taxon
- GuavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- Lucknow 49t0
- Treatment
- RDF + 100% Enriched FYM TN Govt. rec.@500g/treee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 42.3 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results revealed that the application of RDF + 100% Enriched FYM TN Govt. rec.@500g/tree recorded highest 50% flowering (33.6%), fruit retention (51.5%), highest yield (42.3 t/ha) and quality parameters like TSS (12.80brix) and lowest acidity (0.42%) followed by treatment RDF + 125% MN Mixture TN Govt. rec.@500g/tree and the same treatment recorded the BC ratio of 3.64 while the control with BC ratio of 2.75.”
t0“Yield and Quality of Guava cv Lucknow 49 in Sodic Soil”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF plus 100% enriched FYM produced TSS of 12.80brix.
- Taxon
- GuavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- Lucknow 49t0
- Treatment
- RDF + 100% Enriched FYM TN Govt. rec.@500g/treee0
- Outcome
- TSSe0
- Value
- 12.80brixe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results revealed that the application of RDF + 100% Enriched FYM TN Govt. rec.@500g/tree recorded highest 50% flowering (33.6%), fruit retention (51.5%), highest yield (42.3 t/ha) and quality parameters like TSS (12.80brix) and lowest acidity (0.42%) followed by treatment RDF + 125% MN Mixture TN Govt. rec.@500g/tree and the same treatment recorded the BC ratio of 3.64 while the control with BC ratio of 2.75.”
t0“Yield and Quality of Guava cv Lucknow 49 in Sodic Soil”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF plus 100% enriched FYM produced acidity of 0.42%.
- Taxon
- GuavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- Lucknow 49t0
- Treatment
- RDF + 100% Enriched FYM TN Govt. rec.@500g/treee0
- Outcome
- aciditye0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 0.42%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results revealed that the application of RDF + 100% Enriched FYM TN Govt. rec.@500g/tree recorded highest 50% flowering (33.6%), fruit retention (51.5%), highest yield (42.3 t/ha) and quality parameters like TSS (12.80brix) and lowest acidity (0.42%) followed by treatment RDF + 125% MN Mixture TN Govt. rec.@500g/tree and the same treatment recorded the BC ratio of 3.64 while the control with BC ratio of 2.75.”
t0“Yield and Quality of Guava cv Lucknow 49 in Sodic Soil”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment had a BC ratio of 3.64 versus 2.75 in the control.
- Taxon
- GuavaPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- RDF + 100% Enriched FYM TN Govt. rec.@500g/treee0
- Outcome
- BC ratioe0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 3.64e0
- Qualifier
- 2.75e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results revealed that the application of RDF + 100% Enriched FYM TN Govt. rec.@500g/tree recorded highest 50% flowering (33.6%), fruit retention (51.5%), highest yield (42.3 t/ha) and quality parameters like TSS (12.80brix) and lowest acidity (0.42%) followed by treatment RDF + 125% MN Mixture TN Govt. rec.@500g/tree and the same treatment recorded the BC ratio of 3.64 while the control with BC ratio of 2.75.”
t0“Yield and Quality of Guava cv Lucknow 49 in Sodic Soil”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results
42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →fertilization · yield · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results
73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
72 papers more in this group
See all 76 papers →fertilization · phenology · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.