Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Micronutrient Mixture Formulation on Growth, Yield and Quality of Guava

D. Janaki; S. Prabhu; R. Poorniammal; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Guava is one of the important fruit crop cultivated all over India. A guava plant shows micronutrient deficiency which could be responsible for lesser yield and quality. Foliar feeding of nutrients to fruit plants has gained much importance in recent years which is quite economical and obviously an ideal way of evading the problems of micronutrients availability and supplementing the fertilizers to the soil. The present investigation was conducted at Horticultural College & Research Institute, Periyakulam during 2018-2019. The experiment was raised on well-established orchard of 3 years old Lucknow -49 guava trees which are planted at 3.0 x 1.5m spacing. The experiment was laid out in Factorial Randomized Block Design (FRBD) with five treatments replicated four times with two different grades. The results revealed that the application of RDF + Enriched MN Mixture (Soil)@2kg/tree + Foliar spray of MNM@0.3% (T3) recorded highest fruit yield of 47.90 t ha-1 , followed by T1 recorded next highest fruit yield of 37.60 t ha-1while the control (T4) recorded the lowest of 19.60 t ha-1 , The treatment T3 recorded the highest in quality parameters with reducing sugar(8.02%), non-reducing sugar(6.93%) and lowest acidity(0.42%) Hence application of grade I RDF + Enriched MN Mixture (Soil)@2kg/tree + Foliar spray of MNM@0.3% can be advocated in increasing the yield and quality of Guava

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 had the highest guava fruit yield, 47.90 t ha-1.

Treatment
RDF + Enriched MN Mixture (Soil)@2kg/tree + Foliar spray of MNM@0.3% (T3)e0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
47.90 t ha-1e0
Comparator
the control (T4)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of RDF + Enriched MN Mixture (Soil)@2kg/tree + Foliar spray of MNM@0.3% (T3) recorded highest fruit yield of 47.90 t ha-1 , followed by T1 recorded next highest fruit yield of 37.60 t ha-1while the control (T4) recorded the lowest of 19.60 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 had the next highest fruit yield, 37.60 t ha-1.

Treatment
T1e0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
next higheste0
Value
37.60 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of RDF + Enriched MN Mixture (Soil)@2kg/tree + Foliar spray of MNM@0.3% (T3) recorded highest fruit yield of 47.90 t ha-1 , followed by T1 recorded next highest fruit yield of 37.60 t ha-1while the control (T4) recorded the lowest of 19.60 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control T4 had the lowest fruit yield, 19.60 t ha-1.

Treatment
the control (T4)e0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
19.60 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of RDF + Enriched MN Mixture (Soil)@2kg/tree + Foliar spray of MNM@0.3% (T3) recorded highest fruit yield of 47.90 t ha-1 , followed by T1 recorded next highest fruit yield of 37.60 t ha-1while the control (T4) recorded the lowest of 19.60 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 produced highest guava reducing sugar (8.02%).

Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
reducing sugare0
Direction
higheste0
Value
8.02%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment T3 recorded the highest in quality parameters with reducing sugar(8.02%), non-reducing sugar(6.93%) and lowest acidity(0.42%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1235 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 produced highest guava non-reducing sugar (6.93%).

Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
non-reducing sugare0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.93%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment T3 recorded the highest in quality parameters with reducing sugar(8.02%), non-reducing sugar(6.93%) and lowest acidity(0.42%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1235 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 produced lowest guava acidity (0.42%).

Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
aciditye0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.42%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment T3 recorded the highest in quality parameters with reducing sugar(8.02%), non-reducing sugar(6.93%) and lowest acidity(0.42%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1235 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend grade I RDF plus enriched soil micronutrient mixture and foliar MNM to increase guava yield and quality.

Treatment
grade I RDF + Enriched MN Mixture (Soil)@2kg/tree + Foliar spray of MNM@0.3%e0
Outcome
increasing the yield and qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hence application of grade I RDF + Enriched MN Mixture (Soil)@2kg/tree + Foliar spray of MNM@0.3% can be advocated in increasing the yield and quality of Guava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1395 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

76 papers: 74 positive, 2 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

application · yield · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

62 papers: 62 positive, 0 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.