Abstract
The paper presents studies of the effect of nanoaquachelate of iron on the growth processes of tobacco plants-regenerants in in vitro plant culture. Morphological features of Nicotiana tabacum L. shoots were compared with the use of FeEDTA, in conditions of its deficiency, and with the use of nanoaquachelate solutions. The peculiarities of the development of regenerating plants of tobacco in conditions of iron deficiency are shown. It was established that under the conditions of long-term cultivation (28 days) with the use of iron nanoaquachelate at a concentration of 140 μg/ml, regenerating plants did not show any signs of inhibition of vital activity, chlorotic depigmentation or aging compared to the control. Anatomical and histochemical features of regenerating plants of tobacco, which were cultivated on nutrient media with different forms and iron content, are shown.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Tobacco regenerants cultured 28 days with 140 μg/ml iron nanoaquachelate showed no inhibition of vital activity versus control.
- Taxon
- Nicotiana tabacum L.
Nicotiana tabacume1 - Treatment
- iron nanoaquachelate at a concentration of 140 μg/mle0
- Outcome
- inhibition of vital activitye0
- Direction
- did not show any signse0
- Qualifier
- long-term cultivation (28 days)e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“under the conditions of long-term cultivation (28 days) with the use of iron nanoaquachelate at a concentration of 140 μg/ml, regenerating plants did not show any signs of inhibition of vital activity, chlorotic depigmentation or aging compared to the control.”
e1“Nicotiana tabacum L. shoots”
Claim · model-written summary
Tobacco regenerants cultured 28 days with 140 μg/ml iron nanoaquachelate showed no chlorotic depigmentation versus control.
- Taxon
- Nicotiana tabacum L.Nicotiana tabacume1
- Treatment
- iron nanoaquachelate at a concentration of 140 μg/mle0
- Outcome
- chlorotic depigmentatione0
- Direction
- did not show any signse0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“under the conditions of long-term cultivation (28 days) with the use of iron nanoaquachelate at a concentration of 140 μg/ml, regenerating plants did not show any signs of inhibition of vital activity, chlorotic depigmentation or aging compared to the control.”
e1“Nicotiana tabacum L. shoots”
Claim · model-written summary
Tobacco regenerants cultured 28 days with 140 μg/ml iron nanoaquachelate showed no aging versus control.
- Taxon
- Nicotiana tabacum L.Nicotiana tabacume1
- Treatment
- iron nanoaquachelate at a concentration of 140 μg/mle0
- Outcome
- aginge0
- Direction
- did not show any signse0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“under the conditions of long-term cultivation (28 days) with the use of iron nanoaquachelate at a concentration of 140 μg/ml, regenerating plants did not show any signs of inhibition of vital activity, chlorotic depigmentation or aging compared to the control.”
e1“Nicotiana tabacum L. shoots”
The same questions in other papers
iron atom · disease · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
nanoparticle · disease · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.