Paper · 2013 · AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY

Effectiveness of botanical powders against Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in some stored leguminous grains under laboratory conditions

Felicia Nkechi Ekeh; Ikechukwu Eugene Onah; Chinedu Ifeanyi Atama; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
31
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The study investigated the comparative efficacy of some botanicals (Aframomum melegueta (K. M. Schumann) seed, Capsicum nigrum (L.) seed, Allium sativum (Woodwill) bulb, Zingiber officinale (Roscoe) rhizome, Azadiracta indica (A. Juss) leaves and Ocimum gratissimum (L.) leaves) and pirimiphos methyl powder in the suppression of Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius) damage in some stored legume (Vigna unguiculata (L.), Vigna subterranea (L.) and Cajanus cajan (L.) seeds. The botanicals were applied at the rate of 0 and 1 g. The pirimiphos methyl powder was applied at 0.1 g. The experiment was laid out in split plot design of eight treatments replicated ten times. Five pairs of oneday old adult C. maculatus were introduced into each jar. Mortality of adult C. maculatus was recorded daily. O. gratissimum was more effective in causing C. maculatus mortality. The LD50 revealed O. gratissimum powder to be the most effective biopesticide. All treatments recorded higher significant (p<0.05) mortality than the experimental control. The proximate analysis of the legumes revealed that the protein content of V. unguiculata was more than others. The phytochemical analysis revealed that alkaloids, steroids, glycosides and terpenoids were present in the botanicals. Out of the six botanicals investigated, O. gratissimum powder was the most effective biopesticide and thus recommended.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ocimum gratissimum was most effective for adult C. maculatus mortality.

Taxon
Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatae0
Treatment
O. gratissimume1
Interactor
C. maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse1pest
Outcome
C. maculatus mortalitye1
Direction
more effectivee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stored legume (Vigna unguiculata (L.), Vigna subterranea (L.) and Cajanus cajan (L.) seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–472 · show in text ↑
e1

“O. gratissimum was more effective in causing C. maculatus mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–864 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ocimum gratissimum powder had the best LD50 performance.

Taxon
Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatae0
Treatment
O. gratissimum powdere1
Outcome
LD50e1
Direction
most effectivee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stored legume (Vigna unguiculata (L.), Vigna subterranea (L.) and Cajanus cajan (L.) seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–472 · show in text ↑
e1

“The LD50 revealed O. gratissimum powder to be the most effective biopesticide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–943 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments caused significantly higher pest mortality than the control.

Taxon
Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatae0
Treatment
All treatmentse1
Outcome
mortalitye1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
experimental controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stored legume (Vigna unguiculata (L.), Vigna subterranea (L.) and Cajanus cajan (L.) seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–472 · show in text ↑
e1

“All treatments recorded higher significant (p<0.05) mortality than the experimental control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1036 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V. unguiculata had greater protein content than the other legumes.

Taxon
V. unguiculataVigna unguiculatae0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
more thane0
Comparator
otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the protein content of V. unguiculata was more than others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1148 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alkaloids, steroids and glycosides were present in the botanicals.

Taxon
botanicalse0
Outcome
alkaloids, steroids, glycosidese0

Verbatim

e0

“alkaloids, steroids, glycosides and terpenoids were present in the botanicals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1268 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Terpenoids were present in the botanicals.

Taxon
botanicalse0
Outcome
terpenoidse0

Verbatim

e0

“alkaloids, steroids, glycosides and terpenoids were present in the botanicals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1268 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend O. gratissimum powder as the most effective biopesticide.

Taxon
Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatae1
Outcome
O. gratissimum powder was the most effective biopesticide and thus recommendede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Out of the six botanicals investigated, O. gratissimum powder was the most effective biopesticide and thus recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1388 · show in text ↑
e1

“stored legume (Vigna unguiculata (L.), Vigna subterranea (L.) and Cajanus cajan (L.) seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–472 · show in text ↑

Ocimum gratissimum · Callosobruchus maculatus · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.