Paper · 2023 · Egyptian Journal of Soil Science

Comparison between Soil and Soilless Cultivation of Autumn Tomato Production under Spanish Net-House Conditions

Mohamed Sharaf-Eldin; Farouk El-Aidy; Nabil Hasssan; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

THE AIM of this study was to compare tomato production in soil and soilless systems during the autumn season under Spanish style net-house and study their effects on growth, fruit yield and fruit quality. Four different substrates of soilless system of peat moss + vermiculite (1:1) peat moss + perlite (1:1), perlite + vermiculite (1:1) and peat moss + vermiculite + perlite (1:1:1) were evaluated. Generally, the results showed that soil cultivation was better than soilless culture in plant growth and fruit yield. However, the substrate of peat moss + perlite was the best studied substrate. Cultivation in the soil did not significantly differ from the cultivation in the substrate of peat moss + perlite in plant height, leaves and flower numbers, early yield, fruits number and average fruit weight. The medium of peat moss + vermiculite + perlite had the lowest values. The chemical quality of the fruit (total soluble solids, acidity, and vitamin C) and its firmness weren't significantly affected by the soil alternatives compared to soil cultivation. It could be concluded that tomato plants that are challenging to cultivate in the soil have been successfully produced using the soilless culture technique with peat moss and perlite medium.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil cultivation gave better plant growth and fruit yield than soilless culture.

Treatment
soil cultivatione0
Outcome
plant growth and fruit yielde0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
soilless culturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil cultivation was better than soilless culture in plant growth and fruit yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–517 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peat moss plus perlite was the best tested substrate.

Material
peat moss + perlitee0
Outcome
best studied substratee0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the substrate of peat moss + perlite was the best studied substrate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–595 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil and peat moss plus perlite did not differ significantly in plant height, leaf and flower numbers.

Treatment
cultivation in the substrate of peat moss + perlitee0
Outcome
plant height, leaves and flower numberse0
Direction
did not significantly differe0
Comparator
Cultivation in the soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivation in the soil did not significantly differ from the cultivation in the substrate of peat moss + perlite in plant height, leaves and flower numbers, early yield, fruits number and average fruit weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–806 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil and peat moss plus perlite did not differ significantly in early yield, fruit number or average fruit weight.

Treatment
cultivation in the substrate of peat moss + perlitee0
Outcome
early yield, fruits number and average fruit weighte0
Direction
did not significantly differe0
Comparator
Cultivation in the soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivation in the soil did not significantly differ from the cultivation in the substrate of peat moss + perlite in plant height, leaves and flower numbers, early yield, fruits number and average fruit weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–806 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peat moss, vermiculite and perlite medium had the lowest values.

Treatment
peat moss + vermiculite + perlitee0
Outcome
lowest valuese0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The medium of peat moss + vermiculite + perlite had the lowest values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–877 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil alternatives did not significantly affect soluble solids, acidity, or vitamin C relative to soil.

Treatment
soil alternativese0
Outcome
total soluble solids, acidity, and vitamin Ce0
Direction
weren't significantly affectede0
Comparator
soil cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chemical quality of the fruit (total soluble solids, acidity, and vitamin C) and its firmness weren't significantly affected by the soil alternatives compared to soil cultivation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil alternatives did not significantly affect fruit firmness relative to soil.

Treatment
soil alternativese0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
weren't significantly affectede0
Comparator
soil cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chemical quality of the fruit (total soluble solids, acidity, and vitamin C) and its firmness weren't significantly affected by the soil alternatives compared to soil cultivation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato plants challenging to grow in soil were successfully produced in peat moss and perlite soilless culture.

Treatment
soilless culture technique with peat moss and perlite mediume0
Outcome
successfully producede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato plants that are challenging to cultivate in the soil have been successfully produced using the soilless culture technique with peat moss and perlite medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1252 · show in text ↑

growing medium · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 112 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 112 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

growing medium · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

169 papers: 126 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 126 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

165 papers more in this group

See all 169 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.