Paper · 2012 · International Journal of Vegetable Science

Olive Mill Waste as a Substitute Growing Medium Component in Tomato Seedling and Crop Production

Eva Sofiadou; Nikos G. Tzortzakis

16
claims
35
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Olive (Olea europaea L.) mill waste disposal has led to a growing concern regarding the impact to the environment and human health. Several soil amendments have been used to improve the physical and chemical characteristics of root zone profiles and mixes. Olive mill waste (OW; olive stone and pulp) in ratios of 10%, 30%, or 50% was used for tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), cv. Luana, seedling production and at 10% or 30% for greenhouse tomato cultivation. Substrates containing peat and OW suppressed plant emergence and increased mean emergence time. Seedling height and biomass was reduced when OW (especially at 50%) was added to substrates, but no differences were observed in the number of leaves produced. Under greenhouse conditions, adding OW (10%–30%) in soil reduced plant height and stem diameter up to 25% compared to the control, but no differences were observed in leaf number. Plant upper biomass and root fresh weight was similar in the 10% OW and control treatments but reduced in 30% OW. Plant yield decreased (up to 36%) when 30% OW was used due to decreased fruit number rather than fruit weight. Addition of OW (10%–30%) maintained fruit firmness but decreased tomato juice pH and electrical conductivity (EC), but no differences were observed in fruit total soluble solids. The EC and K and Na contents of the nutrient were greater in outflow from OW mixtures compared to the control; no differences occurred for pH and Ca content. After a 10-week period, plants grown in 30% OW exhibited phytotoxicity symptoms and reduced growth. Use of 10% OW can be used for seedling production and in greenhouse tomato crop production, maintaining yield and fruit firmness.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Substrates containing peat and olive mill waste suppressed tomato seedling emergence.

Material
cv. Luanae0
Treatment
Substrates containing peat and OWe1
Outcome
plant emergencee1
Direction
suppressede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), cv. Luana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–387 · show in text ↑
e1

“Substrates containing peat and OW suppressed plant emergence and increased mean emergence time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Substrates containing peat and olive mill waste increased mean emergence time of tomato seedlings.

Material
cv. Luanae0
Treatment
Substrates containing peat and OWe1
Outcome
mean emergence timee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), cv. Luana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–387 · show in text ↑
e1

“Substrates containing peat and OW suppressed plant emergence and increased mean emergence time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Olive mill waste at 50% reduced seedling height and biomass of tomato.

Treatment
OW (especially at 50%)e2
Outcome
Seedling height and biomasse2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), cv. Luana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–387 · show in text ↑
e2

“Seedling height and biomass was reduced when OW (especially at 50%) was added to substrates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Olive mill waste at 50% did not change the number of leaves of tomato seedlings.

Treatment
OW (especially at 50%)e2
Outcome
number of leavese3
Direction
no differencese3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), cv. Luana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–387 · show in text ↑
e2

“Seedling height and biomass was reduced when OW (especially at 50%) was added to substrates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–649 · show in text ↑
e3

“but no differences were observed in the number of leaves produced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–716 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 10–30% olive mill waste in soil reduced plant height and stem diameter of greenhouse tomato by up to 25% compared with control.

Treatment
adding OW (10%–30%) in soile4
Outcome
plant height and stem diametere4
Direction
reducede4
Value
up to 25%e4
Comparator
controle4
Setting
Under greenhouse conditionse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), cv. Luana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–387 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under greenhouse conditions, adding OW (10%–30%) in soil reduced plant height and stem diameter up to 25% compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 10–30% olive mill waste in soil did not change leaf number of greenhouse tomato compared with control.

Treatment
adding OW (10%–30%) in soile4
Outcome
leaf numbere5
Direction
no differencese5
Comparator
controle4
Setting
Under greenhouse conditionse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), cv. Luana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–387 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under greenhouse conditions, adding OW (10%–30%) in soil reduced plant height and stem diameter up to 25% compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–847 · show in text ↑
e5

“but no differences were observed in leaf number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper plant biomass and root fresh weight of tomato with 10% olive mill waste were similar to control.

Treatment
10% OWe6
Outcome
Plant upper biomass and root fresh weighte6
Direction
similare6
Comparator
control treatmentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), cv. Luana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–387 · show in text ↑
e6

“Plant upper biomass and root fresh weight was similar in the 10% OW and control treatments but reduced in 30% OW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1010 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper plant biomass and root fresh weight of tomato were reduced with 30% olive mill waste.

Treatment
30% OWe6
Outcome
Plant upper biomass and root fresh weighte6
Direction
reducede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), cv. Luana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–387 · show in text ↑
e6

“Plant upper biomass and root fresh weight was similar in the 10% OW and control treatments but reduced in 30% OW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1010 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield decreased by up to 36% with 30% olive mill waste, due to fewer fruits rather than lower fruit weight.

Treatment
30% OWe7
Outcome
Plant yielde7
Direction
decreasede7
Value
up to 36%e7
Qualifier
due to decreased fruit number rather than fruit weighte7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), cv. Luana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–387 · show in text ↑
e7

“Plant yield decreased (up to 36%) when 30% OW was used due to decreased fruit number rather than fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 10–30% olive mill waste maintained tomato fruit firmness.

Treatment
Addition of OW (10%–30%)e1
Outcome
fruit firmnesse1
Direction
maintainede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), cv. Luana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–387 · show in text ↑
e1

“Addition of OW (10%–30%) maintained fruit firmness but decreased tomato juice pH and electrical conductivity (EC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 10–30% olive mill waste decreased tomato juice pH and electrical conductivity.

Treatment
Addition of OW (10%–30%)e1
Outcome
tomato juice pH and electrical conductivity (EC)e1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), cv. Luana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–387 · show in text ↑
e1

“Addition of OW (10%–30%) maintained fruit firmness but decreased tomato juice pH and electrical conductivity (EC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 10–30% olive mill waste did not change fruit total soluble solids of tomato.

Treatment
Addition of OW (10%–30%)e1
Outcome
fruit total soluble solidse2
Direction
no differencese2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), cv. Luana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–387 · show in text ↑
e1

“Addition of OW (10%–30%) maintained fruit firmness but decreased tomato juice pH and electrical conductivity (EC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1236 · show in text ↑
e2

“but no differences were observed in fruit total soluble solids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EC, K and Na contents of the nutrient outflow were greater from olive mill waste mixtures than from control.

Treatment
OW mixturese1
Outcome
EC and K and Na contents of the nutriente1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), cv. Luana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–387 · show in text ↑
e1

“The EC and K and Na contents of the nutrient were greater in outflow from OW mixtures compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1411 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Olive mill waste mixtures did not change pH and Ca content of the nutrient outflow.

Treatment
OW mixturese1
Outcome
pH and Ca contente2
Direction
no differencese2
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), cv. Luana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–387 · show in text ↑
e1

“The EC and K and Na contents of the nutrient were greater in outflow from OW mixtures compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1411 · show in text ↑
e2

“no differences occurred for pH and Ca content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1458 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato plants grown in 30% olive mill waste showed phytotoxicity symptoms and reduced growth after 10 weeks.

Treatment
30% OWe1
Outcome
phytotoxicity symptoms and reduced growthe1
Qualifier
After a 10-week periode1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), cv. Luana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–387 · show in text ↑
e1

“After a 10-week period, plants grown in 30% OW exhibited phytotoxicity symptoms and reduced growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1558 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 10% olive mill waste for tomato seedling and greenhouse production.

Outcome
Use of 10% OWe1
Qualifier
maintaining yield and fruit firmnesse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Use of 10% OW can be used for seedling production and in greenhouse tomato crop production, maintaining yield and fruit firmness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1688 · show in text ↑

growing medium · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

169 papers: 126 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 126 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

165 papers more in this group

See all 169 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.