Paper · 2023 · Plant Stress

Examining the role of AMF-Biochar in the regulation of spinach growth attributes, nutrients concentrations, and antioxidant enzymes in mitigating drought stress

Modhi O. Alotaibi; Muhammad Ikram; Nahaa M. Alotaibi; et al.

15
claims
50
verbatim quotes
52
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Drought stress is one of the serious threats to crop production. It causes significant deterioration of crop growth and yield by inducing oxidative stress. The biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizae fungi (AMF) can be an effective technique to overcome drought stress. Activated carbon biochar (BC) has the potential to improve soil water holding capacity while AMF inoculation can increase root surface area for better uptake of water. However, their combined application as an amendment against drought still needs scientific justification. That's why the current study was conducted using a combination of AMF and BC on spinach under no drought stress and drought stress. The treatments included i.e., 0, 0.25%, and 0.50%AMF-BC. The experiment was replicated thre times using completely randomized design (CRD). Results showed that 0.5%AMF-BC increase spinach shoot fresh weight (20.34%), shoot dry weight (21.23%), shoot length (3.37%), root fresh weight (16.10%), root dry weight (14.51%), and root length (38.03%) over control under drought stress. The 0.50%AMF-BC increased chlorophyll a (15.33%), chlorophyll b (30.17%), total chlorophyll (18.85%), photosynthetic rate (35.59%), transpiration rate (26.53%), stomatal conductance (13.97%) and internal CO2 concentration (37.15%) compared to control under drought stress. The improvement in N, P, and K concentration in root and shoot verified the efficacious functioning of 0.50%AMF-BC compared to control under drought stress. In conclusion, 0.50%AMF-BC is recommended for the mitigation of drought stress in spinach.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In spinach under drought stress, 0.5%AMF-BC increased shoot fresh weight by 20.34% over the control.

Treatment
0.5%AMF-BCe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
shoot fresh weighte1
Direction
increasee0
Value
20.34%e1
Qualifier
under drought stresse2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.5%AMF-BC increase spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–858 · show in text ↑
e1

“shoot fresh weight (20.34%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–886 · show in text ↑
e2

“over control under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In spinach under drought stress, 0.5%AMF-BC increased shoot dry weight by 21.23% over the control.

Treatment
0.5%AMF-BCe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
shoot dry weighte1
Direction
increasee0
Value
21.23%e1
Qualifier
under drought stresse2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.5%AMF-BC increase spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–858 · show in text ↑
e1

“shoot dry weight (21.23%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–913 · show in text ↑
e2

“over control under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In spinach under drought stress, 0.5%AMF-BC increased shoot length by 3.37% over the control.

Treatment
0.5%AMF-BCe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
shoot lengthe1
Direction
increasee0
Value
3.37%e1
Qualifier
under drought stresse2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.5%AMF-BC increase spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–858 · show in text ↑
e1

“shoot length (3.37%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–935 · show in text ↑
e2

“over control under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In spinach under drought stress, 0.5%AMF-BC increased root fresh weight by 16.10% over the control.

Treatment
0.5%AMF-BCe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
root fresh weighte1
Direction
increasee0
Value
16.10%e1
Qualifier
under drought stresse2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.5%AMF-BC increase spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–858 · show in text ↑
e1

“root fresh weight (16.10%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–963 · show in text ↑
e2

“over control under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In spinach under drought stress, 0.5%AMF-BC increased root dry weight by 14.51% over the control.

Treatment
0.5%AMF-BCe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
root dry weighte1
Direction
increasee0
Value
14.51%e1
Qualifier
under drought stresse2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.5%AMF-BC increase spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–858 · show in text ↑
e1

“root dry weight (14.51%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–989 · show in text ↑
e2

“over control under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In spinach under drought stress, 0.5%AMF-BC increased root length by 38.03% over the control.

Treatment
0.5%AMF-BCe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
root lengthe1
Direction
increasee0
Value
38.03%e1
Qualifier
under drought stresse2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.5%AMF-BC increase spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–858 · show in text ↑
e1

“root length (38.03%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1015 · show in text ↑
e2

“over control under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In spinach under drought stress, 0.50%AMF-BC increased chlorophyll a by 15.33% compared with the control.

Treatment
0.50%AMF-BCe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll ae1
Direction
increasede0
Value
15.33%e1
Qualifier
under drought stresse2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 0.50%AMF-BC increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1076 · show in text ↑
e1

“chlorophyll a (15.33%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1099 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to control under drought stress. The improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1339 · show in text ↑
e3

“using a combination of AMF and BC on spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In spinach under drought stress, 0.50%AMF-BC increased chlorophyll b by 30.17% compared with the control.

Treatment
0.50%AMF-BCe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll be1
Direction
increasede0
Value
30.17%e1
Qualifier
under drought stresse2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 0.50%AMF-BC increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1076 · show in text ↑
e1

“chlorophyll b (30.17%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1123 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to control under drought stress. The improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1339 · show in text ↑
e3

“using a combination of AMF and BC on spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In spinach under drought stress, 0.50%AMF-BC increased total chlorophyll by 18.85% compared with the control.

Treatment
0.50%AMF-BCe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
total chlorophylle1
Direction
increasede0
Value
18.85%e1
Qualifier
under drought stresse2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 0.50%AMF-BC increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1076 · show in text ↑
e1

“total chlorophyll (18.85%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1151 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to control under drought stress. The improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1339 · show in text ↑
e3

“using a combination of AMF and BC on spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In spinach under drought stress, 0.50%AMF-BC increased photosynthetic rate by 35.59% compared with the control.

Treatment
0.50%AMF-BCe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee1
Direction
increasede0
Value
35.59%e1
Qualifier
under drought stresse2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 0.50%AMF-BC increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1076 · show in text ↑
e1

“photosynthetic rate (35.59%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1181 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to control under drought stress. The improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1339 · show in text ↑
e3

“using a combination of AMF and BC on spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In spinach under drought stress, 0.50%AMF-BC increased transpiration rate by 26.53% compared with the control.

Treatment
0.50%AMF-BCe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
transpiration ratee1
Direction
increasede0
Value
26.53%e1
Qualifier
under drought stresse2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 0.50%AMF-BC increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1076 · show in text ↑
e1

“transpiration rate (26.53%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1210 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to control under drought stress. The improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1339 · show in text ↑
e3

“using a combination of AMF and BC on spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In spinach under drought stress, 0.50%AMF-BC increased stomatal conductance by 13.97% compared with the control.

Treatment
0.50%AMF-BCe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
stomatal conductancee1
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.97%e1
Qualifier
under drought stresse2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 0.50%AMF-BC increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1076 · show in text ↑
e1

“stomatal conductance (13.97%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1241 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to control under drought stress. The improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1339 · show in text ↑
e3

“using a combination of AMF and BC on spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In spinach under drought stress, 0.50%AMF-BC increased internal CO2 concentration by 37.15% compared with the control.

Treatment
0.50%AMF-BCe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
internal CO2 concentratione1
Direction
increasede0
Value
37.15%e1
Qualifier
under drought stresse2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 0.50%AMF-BC increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1076 · show in text ↑
e1

“internal CO2 concentration (37.15%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1281 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to control under drought stress. The improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1339 · show in text ↑
e3

“using a combination of AMF and BC on spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In spinach under drought stress, 0.50%AMF-BC improved N, P and K concentrations in root and shoot compared with the control.

Treatment
0.50%AMF-BCe1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
N, P, and K concentration in root and shoote0
Direction
improvemente0
Qualifier
under drought stresse1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The improvement in N, P, and K concentration in root and shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1386 · show in text ↑
e1

“efficacious functioning of 0.50%AMF-BC compared to control under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1479 · show in text ↑
e2

“using a combination of AMF and BC on spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–626 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 0.50%AMF-BC for mitigating drought stress in spinach.

Treatment
0.50%AMF-BCe0
Outcome
mitigation of drought stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.50%AMF-BC is recommended for the mitigation of drought stress in spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1570 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · physiology: photosynthesis · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.