Paper · 1991 · Madras Agricultural Journal

RESPONSE OF GREENGRAM (CO 4) TO SOIL AND FOLIAK NUTRITION

RAJENDRAN R

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of foliar spray of urea and di-ammonium phosphate (DAP) with and without basal dressing of fertilizer was studied on greengram Co4 at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University farm, Coimbatore during 1983-1984. Uptake of N and P was higher when basal application of 50 kg.ha was combined with foliar spraying of urea or DAP twice. The rate of nutrient uptake increased with age of the crop, and reached the peak at 40 and 60 days after sowing (DAS) for P and N respectively. No significant difference was observed in grain yield between urea and DAP foliar spray on equal N basis. The highest income and return rupee¹ invested were recorded by foliar application of urea twice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined basal fertilizer and twice foliar urea or DAP increased N and P uptake.

Treatment
basal application of 50 kg.ha was combined with foliar spraying of urea or DAP twicee0
Outcome
Uptake of N and Pe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Uptake of N and P was higher when basal application of 50 kg.ha was combined with foliar spraying of urea or DAP twice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–333 · show in text ↑
t0

“GREENGRAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient uptake rate rose with crop age.

Organ / stage
age of the crope0
Outcome
rate of nutrient uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“GREENGRAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“The rate of nutrient uptake increased with age of the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–393 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P uptake rate peaked at 40 days after sowing.

Outcome
Pe0
Direction
peake0
Value
40e0
Qualifier
days after sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“GREENGRAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“reached the peak at 40 and 60 days after sowing (DAS) for P and N respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–477 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N uptake rate peaked at 60 days after sowing.

Outcome
Ne0
Direction
peake0
Value
60 days after sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“GREENGRAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“reached the peak at 40 and 60 days after sowing (DAS) for P and N respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–477 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield did not significantly differ between urea and DAP foliar sprays at equal N.

Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
No significant differencee0
Qualifier
equal N basise0
Comparator
DAP foliar spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“GREENGRAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“No significant difference was observed in grain yield between urea and DAP foliar spray on equal N basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice foliar urea produced the highest income and return per rupee invested.

Treatment
foliar application of urea twicee0
Outcome
income and return rupee¹ investede0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“GREENGRAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest income and return rupee¹ invested were recorded by foliar application of urea twice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–680 · show in text ↑

diammonium hydrogen phosphate · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

88 papers: 81 positive, 7 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
    FYM enhanced following mungbean N and P uptake.

    Integrated nutrient management in wheat (Triticum aestivum) mungbeail (Phaseolus radiatus) cropping sequence in arid region · 2001 · compared with the control and 90 kg Nlha

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

application · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

216 papers: 209 positive, 7 negative or no effect

208 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

212 papers more in this group

See all 216 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

29 papers: 29 positive, 0 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.