Paper · 2023 · AGRORADIX Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian

GROWTH AND YIELD OF RICE (Oriza sativa L) DUE TO WATER EFFICIENCY AND FERTILIZER COMPOSITION

Driska Arnanto; Sri Widata; Darnawi Darnawi; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of the volume of water application and the composition of goat manure and urea on the growth and yield of sunggal rice varieties. This research was conducted in Kepuhan Hamlet, Argorejo Village, Sedayu District, Bantul Regency, DIY from September to December 2021. The experimental design in this study was a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with 3 replications. There are two factors consisting of the volume of water supply, namely: N1 (300 ml), N2 (600 ml), N3 (900) and the composition factor of goat manure: urea, namely: P1 {80% (31.4 g):20 % (7.85 g)}, P2 {50% (19.625 g):50% (19.625 g)} and P3 {20% (7.85 g):80%(31.4 g)}. There were two variables observed, namely growth variables including plant height, number of tillers, fresh weight of stover, and dry weight of stover and yield variables including number of panicles, panicle length, percentage of grain content, weight per 1000 grains, weight of grain per clump and weight of grain. contents per clump. Observational analysis used variance at a level of 5%, followed by Duncan's Multiple Range Test (DMRT) at a level of = 5%. The results showed that the volume of water treatment and the composition of goat manure showed no interaction with all growth variables, but there was a significant difference in the fresh weight of the stover. Meanwhile, for the treatment variable, the volume of N1 water as much as 300 ml and the composition of goat manure and urea P2 50%:50% showed an interaction with the yield variable, namely weight of grain per clump and weight of filled grain per clump.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water volume and manure composition showed no interaction for growth variables.

Treatment
volume of water treatment and the composition of goat manuree0
Outcome
growth variablese0
Direction
no interactione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RICE (Oriza sativa L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“the volume of water treatment and the composition of goat manure showed no interaction with all growth variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh stover weight differed significantly.

Outcome
fresh weight of the stovere0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RICE (Oriza sativa L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“there was a significant difference in the fresh weight of the stover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N1 water and P2 fertilizer interacted for grain weight per clump.

Treatment
N1 water as much as 300 ml and the composition of goat manure and urea P2 50%:50%e0
Outcome
weight of grain per clumpe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RICE (Oriza sativa L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“the volume of N1 water as much as 300 ml and the composition of goat manure and urea P2 50%:50% showed an interaction with the yield variable, namely weight of grain per clump and weight of filled grain per clump”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N1 water and P2 fertilizer interacted for filled grain weight per clump.

Treatment
N1 water as much as 300 ml and the composition of goat manure and urea P2 50%:50%e0
Outcome
weight of filled grain per clumpe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RICE (Oriza sativa L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“the volume of N1 water as much as 300 ml and the composition of goat manure and urea P2 50%:50% showed an interaction with the yield variable, namely weight of grain per clump and weight of filled grain per clump”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1595 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 222 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

fertilization · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

759 papers: 670 positive, 89 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 670 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

755 papers more in this group

See all 759 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.