Abstract
Late blight of potato is the most economical disease which can result into crop failures if it is not properly managed early. So that, our objective was to update yield loss assessment on late blight disease of potato. The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications with a total of 5 treatments. All fungicides significantly controlled the disease at both early and late stage of the crop in comparison to the unsprayed plot. The minimum 151.7 AUDPC was recorded on the tretement was sprayed by fungicide supper plus. The lowest next three treatements were spayed by Mancozeb, Zorphic, and Redomil, were resulted 320.8, 350, 408 AUDPC respectively. The control treatment (water sprayed) had the highest AUDPC (1131.7). The highest mean tuber yield (34.4t/ha) was obtained from fungicide Zorphic followed by the standard fungicide (Redomil) which gave (30 t ha-1) whereas the control treatment gave 5.7 t ha -1. The highest yield loss (72.9%) occurred in the unsprayed plots of cultivar Jalenie compared with Zorphic fungicide sprayed plots. Generally all disease and yield parameter indicate that among the four fungicides spray; Zorphic was the most effective followed by Redomil Gold, Supper plus and Mancozeb sprayed plots. Thus based on the performance of fungicides for the management of late blight, potato yield and yield components, Supper plus and zorphic deserve to be considered as an alternate fungicide to the widely used fungicide Mancozeb and Redomil, respectivelly in the country.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
All fungicides significantly controlled late blight at early and late stages versus unsprayed plots.
- Taxon
- Potato
Solanum tuberosumt0 - Treatment
- All fungicidese0
- Interactor
- Late Blightt0pathogen
- Outcome
- diseasee0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Comparator
- unsprayed plote0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All fungicides significantly controlled the disease at both early and late stage of the crop in comparison to the unsprayed plot.”
t0“Potato Late Blight Disease”
Claim · model-written summary
Supper plus had the minimum AUDPC of 151.7.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- fungicide supper pluse0
- Interactor
- Late Blightt0pathogen
- Outcome
- AUDPCe0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Value
- 151.7 AUDPCe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The minimum 151.7 AUDPC was recorded on the tretement was sprayed by fungicide supper plus.”
t0“Potato Late Blight Disease”
Claim · model-written summary
Mancozeb produced 320.8 AUDPC.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- Mancozebe0
- Interactor
- Late Blightt0pathogen
- Outcome
- AUDPCe0
- Direction
- lowerinferrede0
- Value
- 320.8e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The lowest next three treatements were spayed by Mancozeb, Zorphic, and Redomil, were resulted 320.8, 350, 408 AUDPC respectively.”
t0“Potato Late Blight Disease”
Claim · model-written summary
Zorphic produced 350 AUDPC.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- Zorphice0
- Interactor
- Late Blightt0pathogen
- Outcome
- AUDPCe0
- Direction
- lowerinferrede0
- Value
- 350e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The lowest next three treatements were spayed by Mancozeb, Zorphic, and Redomil, were resulted 320.8, 350, 408 AUDPC respectively.”
t0“Potato Late Blight Disease”
Claim · model-written summary
Redomil produced 408 AUDPC.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- Redomile0
- Interactor
- Late Blightt0pathogen
- Outcome
- AUDPCe0
- Direction
- lowerinferrede0
- Value
- 408 AUDPCe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The lowest next three treatements were spayed by Mancozeb, Zorphic, and Redomil, were resulted 320.8, 350, 408 AUDPC respectively.”
t0“Potato Late Blight Disease”
Claim · model-written summary
Water sprayed control had the highest AUDPC, 1131.7.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- water sprayede0
- Interactor
- Late Blightt0pathogen
- Outcome
- AUDPCe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1131.7e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The control treatment (water sprayed) had the highest AUDPC (1131.7).”
t0“Potato Late Blight Disease”
Claim · model-written summary
Zorphic gave the highest tuber yield, 34.4t/ha.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- fungicide Zorphice0
- Outcome
- mean tuber yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 34.4t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest mean tuber yield (34.4t/ha) was obtained from fungicide Zorphic”
t0“Potato Late Blight Disease”
Claim · model-written summary
Redomil gave tuber yield of 30 t ha-1.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- Redomile0
- Outcome
- mean tuber yielde1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 30 t ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the standard fungicide (Redomil) which gave (30 t ha-1)”
e1“The highest mean tuber yield (34.4t/ha) was obtained from fungicide Zorphic followed by the standard fungicide (Redomil) which gave (30 t ha-1)”
t0“Potato Late Blight Disease”
Claim · model-written summary
Control tuber yield was 5.7 t ha -1.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- control treatmente0
- Outcome
- mean tuber yielde1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 5.7 t ha -1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“whereas the control treatment gave 5.7 t ha -1.”
e1“The highest mean tuber yield (34.4t/ha) was obtained from fungicide Zorphic followed by the standard fungicide (Redomil) which gave (30 t ha-1) whereas the control treatment gave 5.7 t ha -1.”
t0“Potato Late Blight Disease”
Claim · model-written summary
Unsprayed Jalenie lost 72.9% of yield compared with Zorphic sprayed plots.
Verbatim
e0“The highest yield loss (72.9%) occurred in the unsprayed plots of cultivar Jalenie compared with Zorphic fungicide sprayed plots.”
Claim · model-written summary
Supper plus and zorphic are proposed as alternative late blight fungicides.
- Taxon
- PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- Supper plus and zorphice0
- Outcome
- considered as an alternate fungicidee0
- Comparator
- Mancozeb and Redomile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Supper plus and zorphic deserve to be considered as an alternate fungicide to the widely used fungicide Mancozeb and Redomil, respectivelly in the country.”
t0“Potato Late Blight Disease”
The same questions in other papers
mancozeb · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →fungicide · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
61 papers more in this group
See all 65 papers →fungicide · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
76 papers more in this group
See all 80 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.