Abstract
Abstract The experiment was conducted in one of the fields in the Al-Azzawiya region - Al-Musayyib district 40 km north of the center of Babylon province, during the spring season 2022. The experiment included two factors, two types of mycorrhizae Glomus sp. and G. intraradices, and two concentrations of potassium silicate 3 ml.L −1 and 5 ml.L −1 in addition to control treatments to study their effect on the growth and chemical traits of the fruits. Sweet pepper plant California Wonder. The results showed that there were significant differences between the treatments of the two types of mycorrhiza. The addition of the imported mycorrhizal species G. intraradices significantly excelled on the local mycorrhiza Glomus sp in all studied growth traits. intraradices was distinguished by its significantly excelled in the type of structures causing colonization, the dendritic structure was 15.66 and the mycelium 1.18. As for the treatment of spraying with potassium silicate, it achieved spray treatment at a concentration of 5 ml. L −1 had a significantly excelled in most of the studied growth traits. As for the bi-interaction between G. intraradices and spraying at a concentration of 5 ml.L −1 , it achieved the best results in study parameters. The experiment was carried out using a randomized complete block design, according to the split plot system, with a rate of three replications.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
G. intraradices significantly outperformed the local Glomus sp. mycorrhiza in all studied growth traits of sweet pepper.
- Taxon
- Sweet pepper
Capsicum annuume0 - Material
- California Wondere0
- Treatment
- addition of the imported mycorrhizal species G. intraradicese2
- Interactor
- G. intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese2symbiont
- Outcome
- studied growth traitse2
- Direction
- excellede2
- Comparator
- local mycorrhiza Glomus spe2
- Setting
- fields in the Al-Azzawiya regione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sweet pepper plant California Wonder”
e1“The experiment was conducted in one of the fields in the Al-Azzawiya region”
e2“The addition of the imported mycorrhizal species G. intraradices significantly excelled on the local mycorrhiza Glomus sp in all studied growth traits”
Claim · model-written summary
G. intraradices produced a dendritic colonization structure value of 15.66 in sweet pepper, significantly exceeding the other structure type.
- Taxon
- Sweet pepperCapsicum annuume0
- Interactor
- G. intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese2symbiont
- Outcome
- dendritic structuree3
- Direction
- excellede3
- Value
- 15.66e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sweet pepper plant California Wonder”
e2“The addition of the imported mycorrhizal species G. intraradices significantly excelled on the local mycorrhiza Glomus sp in all studied growth traits”
e3“intraradices was distinguished by its significantly excelled in the type of structures causing colonization, the dendritic structure was 15.66 and the mycelium 1.18”
Claim · model-written summary
G. intraradices produced a mycelium structure value of 1.18 in sweet pepper, significantly exceeding the other structure type.
- Taxon
- Sweet pepperCapsicum annuume0
- Interactor
- G. intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese2symbiont
- Outcome
- myceliume3
- Direction
- excellede3
- Value
- 1.18e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sweet pepper plant California Wonder”
e2“The addition of the imported mycorrhizal species G. intraradices significantly excelled on the local mycorrhiza Glomus sp in all studied growth traits”
e3“intraradices was distinguished by its significantly excelled in the type of structures causing colonization, the dendritic structure was 15.66 and the mycelium 1.18”
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying sweet pepper with potassium silicate at 5 ml/L significantly improved most studied growth traits.
- Taxon
- Sweet pepperCapsicum annuume0
- Treatment
- spraying with potassium silicatee4
- Outcome
- most of the studied growth traitse4
- Direction
- excellede4
- Qualifier
- at a concentration of 5 ml. L −1e4
- Setting
- fields in the Al-Azzawiya regione1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sweet pepper plant California Wonder”
e1“The experiment was conducted in one of the fields in the Al-Azzawiya region”
e4“As for the treatment of spraying with potassium silicate, it achieved spray treatment at a concentration of 5 ml. L −1 had a significantly excelled in most of the studied growth traits”
Claim · model-written summary
The combination of G. intraradices and potassium silicate spraying at 5 ml/L gave the best results in the study parameters of sweet pepper.
- Taxon
- Sweet pepperCapsicum annuume0
- Treatment
- bi-interaction between G. intraradices and spraying at a concentration of 5 ml.L −1e5
- Interactor
- G. intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese5symbiont
- Outcome
- study parameterse5
- Direction
- best resultse5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sweet pepper plant California Wonder”
e5“As for the bi-interaction between G. intraradices and spraying at a concentration of 5 ml.L −1 , it achieved the best results in study parameters”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizophagus intraradices · growth · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
silicate(4-) · growth · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →potassium · growth · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →mycorrhiza · growth · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →application · growth · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results
44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
45 papers more in this group
See all 49 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.