Paper · 2019 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Control of pepper bacterial spot and tomato bacterial speck using bactericides in combination with a plant activator

Rekanović Emil; Potočnik Ivana; Stepanović Miloš; et al.

12
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

The efficacy of a formulated product of tea tree oil (TTO) and a standard copper based bactericide in combinations with acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM) for control of bacterial spot of pepper and bacterial speck of tomato was evaluated under controlled conditions. Treatments with copper hydroxide+ASM at both application rates and TTO+ASM showed the best efficacy in control of bacterial spot disease in pepper plants (with respective efficacy values 83.5%, 83.7 % and 86.9%). Similar efficacy was achieved by treatment with copper hydroxide alone (82.2%). On the other hand, the efficacy of TTO, applied alone, was significantly lower at both rates (63.8% and 71.5%) in bacterial spot control in pepper. The same treatments (copper hydroxide +ASM at both application rates and TTO+ASM) were most efficient in suppressing the causal agent of bacterial speck disease in tomato (87%, 82.3% and 81.6%). The efficacy of treatment with the standard bactericide copper hydroxide, applied alone, was significantly lower compared to its combination with ASM (79.1%). Similarly to the bacterial spot experiment, TTO treatments alone showed lower, although satisfactory efficacy at both application rates (66.1% and 68.9%). The results of this study showed that combination of the bioactive compound - ASM with either the standard copper hydroxide bactericide or TTO significantly improved their efficacy in both bacterial spot and speck disease control, and thus implied that combining different biorational compounds, such as essential oils and bioactive products, with standard copper treatments and their inclusion into integrated management programs are of essential importance for the control of bacterial diseases of pepper and tomato.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper hydroxide plus ASM controlled pepper bacterial spot with 83.5% efficacy at one rate.

Taxon
peppere0
Treatment
copper hydroxide+ASMe0
Outcome
control of bacterial spot diseasee0
Direction
best efficacye0
Value
83.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments with copper hydroxide+ASM at both application rates and TTO+ASM showed the best efficacy in control of bacterial spot disease in pepper plants (with respective efficacy values 83.5%, 83.7 % and 86.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper hydroxide plus ASM controlled pepper bacterial spot with 83.7% efficacy at the other rate.

Taxon
peppere0
Treatment
copper hydroxide+ASMe0
Outcome
control of bacterial spot diseasee0
Direction
best efficacye0
Value
83.7 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments with copper hydroxide+ASM at both application rates and TTO+ASM showed the best efficacy in control of bacterial spot disease in pepper plants (with respective efficacy values 83.5%, 83.7 % and 86.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tea tree oil plus ASM controlled pepper bacterial spot with 86.9% efficacy.

Taxon
peppere0
Treatment
TTO+ASMe0
Outcome
control of bacterial spot diseasee0
Direction
best efficacye0
Value
86.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments with copper hydroxide+ASM at both application rates and TTO+ASM showed the best efficacy in control of bacterial spot disease in pepper plants (with respective efficacy values 83.5%, 83.7 % and 86.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper hydroxide alone had similar pepper bacterial spot control efficacy of 82.2%.

Taxon
peppert0
Treatment
copper hydroxide alonee0
Outcome
efficacye0
Direction
Similare0
Value
82.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Similar efficacy was achieved by treatment with copper hydroxide alone (82.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–551 · show in text ↑
t0

“pepper bacterial spot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tea tree oil alone had significantly lower pepper bacterial spot control efficacy of 63.8% at one rate.

Taxon
peppere0
Treatment
TTO, applied alonee0
Outcome
bacterial spot controle0
Direction
lowere0
Value
63.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the efficacy of TTO, applied alone, was significantly lower at both rates (63.8% and 71.5%) in bacterial spot control in pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–699 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tea tree oil alone had significantly lower pepper bacterial spot control efficacy of 71.5% at the other rate.

Taxon
peppere0
Treatment
TTO, applied alonee0
Outcome
bacterial spot controle0
Direction
lowere0
Value
71.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the efficacy of TTO, applied alone, was significantly lower at both rates (63.8% and 71.5%) in bacterial spot control in pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–699 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper hydroxide plus ASM suppressed tomato bacterial speck with 87% efficacy at one rate.

Treatment
copper hydroxide +ASMe0
Outcome
suppressing the causal agent of bacterial speck diseasee0
Direction
most efficiente0
Value
87%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same treatments (copper hydroxide +ASM at both application rates and TTO+ASM) were most efficient in suppressing the causal agent of bacterial speck disease in tomato (87%, 82.3% and 81.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper hydroxide plus ASM suppressed tomato bacterial speck with 82.3% efficacy at the other rate.

Treatment
copper hydroxide +ASMe0
Outcome
suppressing the causal agent of bacterial speck diseasee0
Direction
most efficiente0
Value
82.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same treatments (copper hydroxide +ASM at both application rates and TTO+ASM) were most efficient in suppressing the causal agent of bacterial speck disease in tomato (87%, 82.3% and 81.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tea tree oil plus ASM suppressed tomato bacterial speck with 81.6% efficacy.

Treatment
TTO+ASMe0
Outcome
suppressing the causal agent of bacterial speck diseasee0
Direction
most efficiente0
Value
81.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same treatments (copper hydroxide +ASM at both application rates and TTO+ASM) were most efficient in suppressing the causal agent of bacterial speck disease in tomato (87%, 82.3% and 81.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper hydroxide alone was significantly less effective against tomato bacterial speck than its ASM combination, with 79.1% efficacy.

Treatment
copper hydroxide, applied alonee0
Outcome
efficacye0
Direction
lowere0
Value
79.1%e0
Comparator
its combination with ASMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The efficacy of treatment with the standard bactericide copper hydroxide, applied alone, was significantly lower compared to its combination with ASM (79.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato bacterial speck”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tea tree oil alone showed lower tomato bacterial speck control efficacy of 66.1% at one rate.

Treatment
TTO treatments alonee0
Outcome
efficacye0
Direction
lowere0
Value
66.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TTO treatments alone showed lower, although satisfactory efficacy at both application rates (66.1% and 68.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato bacterial speck”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tea tree oil alone showed lower tomato bacterial speck control efficacy of 68.9% at the other rate.

Treatment
TTO treatments alonee0
Outcome
efficacye0
Direction
lowere0
Value
68.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TTO treatments alone showed lower, although satisfactory efficacy at both application rates (66.1% and 68.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato bacterial speck”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–59 · show in text ↑

tea tree oil · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Copper hydroxide · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.