Paper · 2022 · PLANT CELL BIOTECHNOLOGY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE TRAITS OF SWEET PEPPER AS INFLUENCED BY COPPER NANOPARTICLES

ISHRAT BATOOL; IMRAN HASSAN; SYED ZIA UL HASAN; et al.

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Sweet pepper (Capsicum annum L.) is a main group of Solanaceous family. Sweet peppers are a great source of vitamin C. Sweet pepper is used in culinary and salads and possess colors and flavor variation. Nanotechnology is capable of enhancing agricultural production and food security insurance. The present study was conducted for determination of possible role of copper nanoparticles for increasing germination of sweet pepper while copper nanoparticles were used as foliar sprays to enhance the growth and production of sweet pepper. Regarding germination percentage, the application of 20 mg l-1 Cu NPs gave (95%) best results as compared to 30 mg l-1 (85%), 40 mg l-1 (60%) and control (40%). In Pre harvest treatment, with different concentrations of Cu NPs it was found that 20 mg l-1 Cu NPs had the most significant improved pre and post-harvest parameters except weight loss as compare to 30 mg l-1, 40 mg l-1 and control. It was minimum at 20 mg l-1 Cu NPs other concentrations. Maximum numbers of fruits were at 20 mg l-1 Cu NPs (21.5) as compare to 30 mg l-1 (16.5), 40 mg l-1 (16.75) and control (17.25). The findings of this research would be helpful for future studies regarding the quality enhancement of commercially grown vegetables.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

20 mg l-1 Cu NPs gave 95% germination, versus 85% at 30 mg l-1, 60% at 40 mg l-1 and 40% in controls.

Taxon
Sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
20 mg l-1 Cu NPse0
Outcome
germination percentagee1
Direction
beste0
Value
95%e0
Qualifier
30 mg l-1 (85%), 40 mg l-1 (60%) and control (40%)e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of 20 mg l-1 Cu NPs gave (95%) best results as compared to 30 mg l-1 (85%), 40 mg l-1 (60%) and control (40%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–698 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET PEPPER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“Regarding germination percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–570 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

20 mg l-1 Cu NPs most improved pre- and post-harvest parameters compared with other doses and controls.

Taxon
SWEET PEPPERCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
20 mg l-1 Cu NPse0
Outcome
pre and post-harvest parameterse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
30 mg l-1, 40 mg l-1 and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“20 mg l-1 Cu NPs had the most significant improved pre and post-harvest parameters except weight loss as compare to 30 mg l-1, 40 mg l-1 and control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–932 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET PEPPER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weight loss was minimum with 20 mg l-1 Cu NPs.

Taxon
SWEET PEPPERCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
20 mg l-1 Cu NPse0
Outcome
weight losse1
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
other concentrationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was minimum at 20 mg l-1 Cu NPs other concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET PEPPER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“except weight loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

20 mg l-1 Cu NPs produced a maximum of 21.5 fruits compared with 16.5, 16.75 and 17.25 at the other doses and control.

Taxon
SWEET PEPPERCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
20 mg l-1 Cu NPse0
Outcome
numbers of fruitse0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
21.5e0
Qualifier
30 mg l-1 (16.5), 40 mg l-1 (16.75) and control (17.25)e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum numbers of fruits were at 20 mg l-1 Cu NPs (21.5) as compare to 30 mg l-1 (16.5), 40 mg l-1 (16.75) and control (17.25).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET PEPPER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑

copper atom · growth · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: postharvest · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.