Paper · 2023 · Journal of Eco-friendly Agriculture

A Comparative Study of Plant Extracts and Biocontrol Agents for Managing Alternaria burnsii in Cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.): An In-vitro Assessment

Sunaina Varma; Data Ram Kumhar

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The objective of the current study was to assess the in-vitro efficacy of plant extracts and bio-agents in managing Alternaria burnsii, the causal agent of blight disease in cumin. Eleven plants extract were selected based on their availability in the local region and evaluated for antifungal activity in the laboratory for their effectiveness against A. burnsii. Plants extract was tested at four different concentrations 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% each by food poisoning technique. Additionally, four bio-agents, namely Trichoderma harzianum, T. viride, Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus subtilis were evaluated against A. burnsii. The experiments were conducted from 2019 to 2021 at the Advanced Laboratory on Bioagents in the Plant Pathology Department, SKRAU, Bikaner. Among the plant extracts, Neem Seed Kernel Extract (NSKE) and Neem leaf extract were found to be the most effective, resulting in mean growth inhibition of 48.88 per cent and 45.85 per cent, respectively. The least per cent mean growth inhibition, 13.14 per cent, was recorded with Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus). Among the four different bio-agents, Trichoderma harzianum was found to be the most effective in suppressing the growth of the pathogen, achieving a growth inhibition of 69.63 per cent. This study provides valuable insights into the use of locally available plant extracts and bio-agents for the management of cumin blight, promoting eco-friendly approaches.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem Seed Kernel Extract (NSKE) was the most effective plant extract against Alternaria burnsii, with mean growth inhibition of 48.88 per cent.

Treatment
Neem Seed Kernel Extract (NSKE)e1
Interactor
Alternaria burnsiiAlternaria burnsiie0pathogen
Outcome
mean growth inhibitione1
Direction
most effectivee1
Value
48.88 per cente1

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cuminum cyminum
Cuminum cyminum · TaxonHerbolario Allium: www.alliumherbal.com · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the in-vitro efficacy of plant extracts and bio-agents in managing Alternaria burnsii, the causal agent of blight disease in cumin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–179 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the plant extracts, Neem Seed Kernel Extract (NSKE) and Neem leaf extract were found to be the most effective, resulting in mean growth inhibition of 48.88 per cent and 45.85 per cent, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem leaf extract was the most effective plant extract against Alternaria burnsii, with mean growth inhibition of 45.85 per cent.

Treatment
Neem leaf extracte1
Interactor
Alternaria burnsiiAlternaria burnsiie0pathogen
Outcome
mean growth inhibitione1
Direction
most effectivee1
Value
45.85 per cente1

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cuminum cyminum
Cuminum cyminum · TaxonHerbolario Allium: www.alliumherbal.com · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the in-vitro efficacy of plant extracts and bio-agents in managing Alternaria burnsii, the causal agent of blight disease in cumin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–179 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the plant extracts, Neem Seed Kernel Extract (NSKE) and Neem leaf extract were found to be the most effective, resulting in mean growth inhibition of 48.88 per cent and 45.85 per cent, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) extract gave the least mean growth inhibition of Alternaria burnsii, 13.14 per cent.

Treatment
Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus)e2
Interactor
Alternaria burnsiiAlternaria burnsiie0pathogen
Outcome
mean growth inhibitione2
Direction
leaste2
Value
13.14 per cente2

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cuminum cyminum
Cuminum cyminum · TaxonHerbolario Allium: www.alliumherbal.com · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the in-vitro efficacy of plant extracts and bio-agents in managing Alternaria burnsii, the causal agent of blight disease in cumin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–179 · show in text ↑
e2

“The least per cent mean growth inhibition, 13.14 per cent, was recorded with Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1086 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma harzianum was the most effective bio-agent in suppressing the growth of Alternaria burnsii, with growth inhibition of 69.63 per cent.

Treatment
Trichoderma harzianume3
Interactor
Alternaria burnsiiAlternaria burnsiie0pathogen
Second interactor
Trichoderma harzianumTrichoderma harzianume3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of the pathogene3
Direction
suppressinge3
Value
69.63 per cente3
Comparator
the four different bio-agentse3

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cuminum cyminum
Cuminum cyminum · TaxonHerbolario Allium: www.alliumherbal.com · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the in-vitro efficacy of plant extracts and bio-agents in managing Alternaria burnsii, the causal agent of blight disease in cumin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–179 · show in text ↑
e3

“Among the four different bio-agents, Trichoderma harzianum was found to be the most effective in suppressing the growth of the pathogen, achieving a growth inhibition of 69.63 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1272 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Locally available plant extracts and bio-agents are suggested for managing cumin blight in an eco-friendly way.

Treatment
locally available plant extracts and bio-agentse4
Outcome
management of cumin blighte4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cuminum cyminum
Cuminum cyminum · TaxonHerbolario Allium: www.alliumherbal.com · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e4

“This study provides valuable insights into the use of locally available plant extracts and bio-agents for the management of cumin blight, promoting eco-friendly approaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1445 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma harzianum · Alternaria burnsii · Cuminum cyminum (cumin)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · Alternaria burnsii · Cuminum cyminum (cumin)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.