Paper · 2023 · OCL

Plant density influences yield, yield components, lint quality and seed oil content of cotton genotypes

Sepideh Jalilian; Hamid Madani; Mosareza Vafaie-Tabar; et al.

14
claims
33
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Choosing suitable varieties and manipulating plant population are crucial management aspects in any cropping system that goals to improve yield, quality and the balance between plant demand and environmental resource availability. A two-year field experiment was conducted at Tehran, Iran, in a split plot design and replicated thrice to examine the effect of the planting density (low, moderate and high) on ten cotton genotypes. In term of lint yield and among the cotton genotypes G8 (1269 kg · ha −1 ), G4 (1263 kg · ha −1 ), G1 (1239 kg · ha −1 ) and G2 (1123 kg · ha −1 ) were statistically at par with each other but significantly superior to G7 (914 kg · ha −1 ) and G9 (936 kg · ha −1 ). Lint yield in high plant density (1386 kg · ha −1 ) was found to be remarkably superior over medium and low plant density (1029 and 890 kg · ha −1 , respectively) by average of 25.7% and 35.7%, respectively. Cotton genotypes at low plant density had higher boll plant −1 (6.46% and 15.3%, respectively), lint percentage (5.8% and 12%, respectively) and lint strength (0.6% and 1.9%, respectively) compared to moderate and high plant densities. The genotypes cultivated at high plant density produced higher seed and lint yield, higher lint elasticity and lower seed oil content, lint length and lint quality index. Based on this experiment, it is concluded that high seed cotton yield can be achieved at high plant density while higher lint quality can be yielded at low plant density.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes G8, G4, G1 and G2 had statistically similar lint yields superior to G7 and G9.

Material
G8e0
Outcome
lint yielde1
Direction
superiore0
Value
1269 kg · ha −1e0
Comparator
G7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“among the cotton genotypes G8 (1269 kg · ha −1 ), G4 (1263 kg · ha −1 ), G1 (1239 kg · ha −1 ) and G2 (1123 kg · ha −1 ) were statistically at par with each other but significantly superior to G7 (914 kg · ha −1 ) and G9 (936 kg · ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–695 · show in text ↑
e1

“In term of lint yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–452 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High density lint yield exceeded moderate density by 25.7%.

Treatment
high plant densitye0
Outcome
Lint yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Value
25.7%e0
Comparator
mediume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“Lint yield in high plant density (1386 kg · ha −1 ) was found to be remarkably superior over medium and low plant density (1029 and 890 kg · ha −1 , respectively) by average of 25.7% and 35.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–903 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High density lint yield exceeded low density by 35.7%.

Treatment
high plant densitye0
Outcome
Lint yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Value
35.7%e0
Comparator
low plant densitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“Lint yield in high plant density (1386 kg · ha −1 ) was found to be remarkably superior over medium and low plant density (1029 and 890 kg · ha −1 , respectively) by average of 25.7% and 35.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–903 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low density increased bolls per plant compared with moderate density by 6.46%.

Treatment
low plant densitye0
Outcome
boll plant −1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
6.46%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cotton genotypes at low plant density had higher boll plant −1 (6.46% and 15.3%, respectively), lint percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low density increased bolls per plant compared with high density by 15.3%.

Treatment
low plant densitye0
Outcome
boll plant −1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
15.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cotton genotypes at low plant density had higher boll plant −1 (6.46% and 15.3%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–999 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low density had higher lint percentage than moderate density by 5.8%.

Treatment
low plant densitye1
Outcome
lint percentagee0
Direction
highere1
Value
5.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“lint percentage (5.8% and 12%, respectively) and lint strength”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1063 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cotton genotypes at low plant density had higher boll plant −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–967 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low density had higher lint percentage than high density by 12%.

Treatment
low plant densitye1
Outcome
lint percentagee0
Direction
highere1
Value
12%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“lint percentage (5.8% and 12%, respectively) and lint strength”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1063 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cotton genotypes at low plant density had higher boll plant −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–967 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low density had higher lint strength than moderate density by 0.6%.

Treatment
low plant densitye1
Outcome
lint strengthe0
Direction
highere1
Value
0.6%e0
Comparator
moderatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“lint strength (0.6% and 1.9%, respectively) compared to moderate and high plant densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1139 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cotton genotypes at low plant density had higher boll plant −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–967 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low density had higher lint strength than high density by 1.9%.

Treatment
low plant densitye1
Outcome
lint strengthe0
Direction
highere1
Value
1.9%e0
Comparator
high plant densitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“lint strength (0.6% and 1.9%, respectively) compared to moderate and high plant densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1139 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cotton genotypes at low plant density had higher boll plant −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–967 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High density increased seed and lint yield and lint elasticity.

Treatment
high plant densitye0
Outcome
seed and lint yield, higher lint elasticitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“The genotypes cultivated at high plant density produced higher seed and lint yield, higher lint elasticity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1247 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High density lowered seed oil content.

Treatment
high plant densitye0
Outcome
seed oil contente0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“high plant density produced higher seed and lint yield, higher lint elasticity and lower seed oil content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High density lowered lint length and lint quality index.

Treatment
high plant densitye0
Outcome
lint length and lint quality indexe0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“high plant density produced higher seed and lint yield, higher lint elasticity and lower seed oil content, lint length and lint quality index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1310 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded high density achieves high seed cotton yield.

Outcome
high seed cotton yield can be achieved at high plant densitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“high seed cotton yield can be achieved at high plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1419 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded low density yields higher lint quality.

Outcome
higher lint quality can be yielded at low plant densitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher lint quality can be yielded at low plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1481 · show in text ↑

density · quality: oil · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

density · quality: general · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

density · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 34 positive, 35 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.