Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Influence of Seed Invigoration with Organic Kunapajala on Seed Quality and Biochemical Activity in Late Sown Wheat

Okram Ricky Devi; Omvati Verma; Bibek Laishram; et al.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A laboratory experiment was conducted at GBPUA&T, Pantnagar during rabi season of 2020-2021 to study the influence of seed invigoration with organic kunapajala on germination and biochemical activity in wheat variety UP-2526. The experiment was laid in completely randomized design which consisted of five treatments viz; no seed priming (control), Hydropriming for 16 hours, kunapajala seed priming @10%, 25% and 50% for 16 hours. Results revealed that germination percentage in hydro primed seeds and 25% kunapajala primed seeds jointly recorded maximum germination percentage (99.7%) which was statistically at par with 10% kunapajala priming (99.3%). Seed reserve mobilization efficiency after 4th day and 8th day of incubation was significantly affected by seed invigoration treatments. 25% kunapajala primed seeds recorded significantly higher dehydrogenase activity (0.68 OD) which was at par with hydroprimed seeds and 10% kunapajala primed seeds (0.63 and 0.62 OD, respectively). So, seed priming with either 10% or 25% organic kunapajala is an effective method to bring about improvement in germination of wheat and predict its field performance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydroprimed wheat seeds had maximum germination of 99.7%.

Treatment
hydro primed seedse0
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
99.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“germination percentage in hydro primed seeds and 25% kunapajala primed seeds jointly recorded maximum germination percentage (99.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–586 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat seeds primed with 25% kunapajala had maximum germination of 99.7%.

Treatment
25% kunapajala primed seedse0
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
99.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“25% kunapajala primed seeds jointly recorded maximum germination percentage (99.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–586 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat seeds primed with 10% kunapajala had 99.3% germination, statistically at par with the maximum.

Treatment
10% kunapajala priminge0
Outcome
germination percentagee1
Direction
at pare0
Value
99.3%e0
Comparator
maximum germination percentagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“statistically at par with 10% kunapajala priming (99.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–653 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum germination percentage (99.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–586 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed invigoration significantly affected wheat seed reserve mobilization efficiency on day 4.

Treatment
seed invigoration treatmentse0
Outcome
Seed reserve mobilization efficiencye0
Qualifier
4th daye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed reserve mobilization efficiency after 4th day and 8th day of incubation was significantly affected by seed invigoration treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed invigoration significantly affected wheat seed reserve mobilization efficiency on day 8.

Treatment
seed invigoration treatmentse0
Outcome
Seed reserve mobilization efficiencye0
Qualifier
8th daye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed reserve mobilization efficiency after 4th day and 8th day of incubation was significantly affected by seed invigoration treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming with 25% kunapajala increased wheat seed dehydrogenase activity to 0.68 OD.

Treatment
25% kunapajala primed seedse0
Outcome
dehydrogenase activitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.68 ODe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“25% kunapajala primed seeds recorded significantly higher dehydrogenase activity (0.68 OD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydroprimed wheat seeds had dehydrogenase activity of 0.63 OD, at par with 25% kunapajala priming.

Treatment
hydroprimed seedse0
Outcome
dehydrogenase activitye1
Direction
at pare0
Value
0.63e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at par with hydroprimed seeds and 10% kunapajala primed seeds (0.63 and 0.62 OD, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–987 · show in text ↑
e1

“dehydrogenase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat seeds primed with 10% kunapajala had dehydrogenase activity of 0.62 OD, at par with 25% priming.

Treatment
10% kunapajala primed seedse0
Outcome
dehydrogenase activitye1
Direction
at pare0
Value
0.62 ODe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at par with hydroprimed seeds and 10% kunapajala primed seeds (0.63 and 0.62 OD, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–987 · show in text ↑
e1

“dehydrogenase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 10% or 25% organic kunapajala priming to improve wheat germination.

Treatment
10% or 25% organic kunapajalae0
Outcome
improvement in germinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed priming with either 10% or 25% organic kunapajala is an effective method to bring about improvement in germination of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1121 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

293 papers: 259 positive, 34 negative or no effect

258 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

289 papers more in this group

See all 293 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.