Paper · 2021 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Effect of shading net, planting methods and bio-extract on production of muskmelon

Obaid, Abdulraheem A.; Al-Alawy, Hassan H.; Hassan, Kadhum Daley; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Growing vegetable transplants under shade nets are currently becoming more popular to protect high intensities of light and high temperature. This study was undertaken to evaluate the influence of shading net at 30% shading and an unshaded control, methods of the planting, direct sowing, transplanting, and foliar application of a biozyme fertilizer at 0 and 0.5 ml L–1 production, and quality of muskmelon. These treatments were laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) and were arranged in a split‑split plot with three replications. Results showed that 30% shading treatment produced the highest leaf chlorophyll content (57.07 SPAD) and TSS (13.05%). Direct sowing gives a higher value for fruit weight (3583 g), most yield per plant (3772 g) and most total yield (3772 g). Transplanting produced the highest fruit per plant (1.58 fruit). The 0.5 ml L–1 fertilizer treatment had the least time to maturity (92.08 days). The interaction between shading treatment, establishment methods and biozyme fertilizer improve the fruit quality and yield of muskmelon.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirty percent shade yielded the highest leaf chlorophyll content at 57.07 SPAD.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
30% shading treatmente0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
57.07 SPADe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“30% shading treatment produced the highest leaf chlorophyll content (57.07 SPAD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–650 · show in text ↑
t0

“muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirty percent shade yielded the highest TSS at 13.05%.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
30% shading treatmente0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
13.05%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“30% shading treatment produced the highest leaf chlorophyll content (57.07 SPAD) and TSS (13.05%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–667 · show in text ↑
t0

“muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct sowing produced higher fruit weight of 3583 g.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
Direct sowinge0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
3583 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Direct sowing gives a higher value for fruit weight (3583 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct sowing produced the greatest yield per plant, 3772 g.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
Direct sowinge0
Outcome
yield per plante0
Direction
moste0
Value
3772 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Direct sowing gives a higher value for fruit weight (3583 g), most yield per plant (3772 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct sowing produced the greatest total yield, 3772 g.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
Direct sowinge0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
moste0
Value
3772 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Direct sowing gives a higher value for fruit weight (3583 g), most yield per plant (3772 g) and most total yield (3772 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanting produced the highest number of fruits per plant, 1.58.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
Transplantinge0
Outcome
fruit per plante0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.58 fruite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transplanting produced the highest fruit per plant (1.58 fruit)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biozyme fertilizer at 0.5 ml L–1 gave the shortest time to maturity, 92.08 days.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
0.5 ml L–1 fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
time to maturitye0
Direction
leaste0
Value
92.08 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 0.5 ml L–1 fertilizer treatment had the least time to maturity (92.08 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of shade, establishment method and biozyme fertilizer improved fruit quality.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
shading treatment, establishment methods and biozyme fertilizere0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between shading treatment, establishment methods and biozyme fertilizer improve the fruit quality and yield of muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1074 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of shade, establishment method and biozyme fertilizer improved yield.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
shading treatment, establishment methods and biozyme fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between shading treatment, establishment methods and biozyme fertilizer improve the fruit quality and yield of muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1074 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

95 papers: 72 positive, 23 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

transplanting · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

shade · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · phenology · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.