Paper · 2014 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Organic Matter Effect on Glomus Intrarradices in Beans (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) Growth Cultivated in Soils with Two Sources of Water under Greenhouse Conditions

A. K. Gardezi; S. R. Márquez-Berber; B. Figueroa-Sandoval; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

The objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of organic matter on the association with Glomus intrarradices and soil contamination on beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). The study was done under greenhouse conditions at the Montecillo Campus of the Postgraduate College, Mexico. Two soils were used, one irrigated with sewage water and the other one with clean water from a well. Half of the plants were inoculated with Glomus intrarradices. Vermicompost was used as a source of organic matter. There were highly significant increases (p≤0.05) in all the variables recorded due to the application of organic matter, and to the inoculation with Glomus intarradices. The irrigation source of the soils used for this experiment only had a significant effect (p≤0.05) on pod number and nitrogen fixation. The best growth and grain yield occurred with inoculated plants and supplementary organic matter.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic matter significantly increased all recorded bean variables.

Taxon
beanst0
Treatment
application of organic mattere0
Outcome
all the variables recordede0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“There were highly significant increases (p≤0.05) in all the variables recorded due to the application of organic matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–622 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beans (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Glomus significantly increased all recorded bean variables.

Taxon
beanst0
Treatment
inoculation with Glomus intarradicese0
Interactor
Glomus intarradicese0symbiont
Outcome
all the variables recordede1
Direction
increasese1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“and to the inoculation with Glomus intarradices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–671 · show in text ↑
e1

“There were highly significant increases (p≤0.05) in all the variables recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beans (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–85 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation source significantly affected pod number.

Taxon
beanst0
Outcome
pod numbere0
Setting
irrigation source of the soilse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigation source of the soils used for this experiment only had a significant effect (p≤0.05) on pod number and nitrogen fixation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beans (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–85 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation source significantly affected nitrogen fixation.

Taxon
beanst0
Outcome
nitrogen fixatione0
Setting
irrigation source of the soilse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigation source of the soils used for this experiment only had a significant effect (p≤0.05) on pod number and nitrogen fixation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beans (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated beans with supplementary organic matter had the best growth and grain yield.

Taxon
beanst0
Treatment
inoculated plants and supplementary organic mattere0
Interactor
Glomus intrarradicese1symbiont
Outcome
growth and grain yielde0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The best growth and grain yield occurred with inoculated plants and supplementary organic matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beans (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“Half of the plants were inoculated with Glomus intrarradices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–448 · show in text ↑

organic · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.