Abstract

As a result of fungal diseases, green gram is prone to powdery mildew, anthracnose, cercospora leaf spot, and dry root rot. The one that has the most influence on the economy is anthracnose, which is caused by Colletotricum gleosporiodes (Penz.) Penz. & Sacc. The most important aspect of the study was the evaluation of fungicides, including Carbendazim 12%+ Mancozeb 63% WP, azoxystrobin 18.2%+ difenoconazole in three different concentrations to manage anthracnose under field conditions in 2020–2021 and 2021–2022, along with CIB recommended check metiram 55%+ pyraclostrobin 5% WG. According to the findings, treatment T3 carbandazim 12% + mancozeb 63% 75 WP, 0.133%, had the lowest disease intensity of 11.84 and the highest disease control of 70.72, followed by T6 azoxystrobin 18% + difenoconazole 11.4% SC, 0.133% (17.43 DI), T7 (metiram 55%) + pyraclostrobin 5% WG, 0.30% (20.15 DI), and T2 (20.92 DI). Treatments T1 (carbendazim 12%+ mancozeb 63% WP, 0.066%), T4 (azoxystrobin 18.2% + difenoconazole 11.4% SC, 0.066%), and T5 (azoxystrobin 18.2%+ difenoconazole 11.4% SC, 0.010%) all achieved parity with disease control of 26.80, 27.49, and 28.08, respectively. The maximum illness intensity in the control group was 40.44.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 had the lowest anthracnose disease intensity, 11.84.

Treatment
T3 carbandazim 12% + mancozeb 63% 75 WP, 0.133%e0
Interactor
Colletotricum gleosporiodes (Penz.) Penz. & Sacc.t0pathogen
Outcome
disease intensitye0
Direction
loweste0
Value
11.84e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment T3 carbandazim 12% + mancozeb 63% 75 WP, 0.133%, had the lowest disease intensity of 11.84”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“Management of anthracnose (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] caused by Colletotricum gleosporiodes (Penz.) Penz. & Sacc.) disease in green gram through ready-mix fungicides under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–189 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 had the highest disease control, 70.72.

Treatment
T3 carbandazim 12% + mancozeb 63% 75 WP, 0.133%e0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
higheste0
Value
70.72e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment T3 carbandazim 12% + mancozeb 63% 75 WP, 0.133%, had the lowest disease intensity of 11.84 and the highest disease control of 70.72”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–755 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram through ready-mix fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 had anthracnose disease intensity of 17.43.

Treatment
T6 azoxystrobin 18% + difenoconazole 11.4% SC, 0.133%e0
Outcome
DIe0
Value
17.43e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T6 azoxystrobin 18% + difenoconazole 11.4% SC, 0.133% (17.43 DI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–833 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram through ready-mix fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 had disease intensity of 20.15.

Treatment
T7 (metiram 55%) + pyraclostrobin 5% WG, 0.30%e0
Outcome
DIe0
Value
20.15e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T7 (metiram 55%) + pyraclostrobin 5% WG, 0.30% (20.15 DI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram through ready-mix fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–166 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 had disease intensity of 20.92.

Treatment
T2e0
Outcome
DIe0
Value
20.92e0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T2 (20.92 DI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram through ready-mix fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 achieved disease control of 26.80.

Treatment
T1 (carbendazim 12%+ mancozeb 63% WP, 0.066%)e0
Outcome
disease controle0
Value
26.80e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T1 (carbendazim 12%+ mancozeb 63% WP, 0.066%), T4 (azoxystrobin 18.2% + difenoconazole 11.4% SC, 0.066%), and T5 (azoxystrobin 18.2%+ difenoconazole 11.4% SC, 0.010%) all achieved parity with disease control of 26.80, 27.49, and 28.08, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram through ready-mix fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 achieved disease control of 27.49.

Treatment
T4 (azoxystrobin 18.2% + difenoconazole 11.4% SC, 0.066%)e0
Outcome
disease controle0
Value
27.49e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T1 (carbendazim 12%+ mancozeb 63% WP, 0.066%), T4 (azoxystrobin 18.2% + difenoconazole 11.4% SC, 0.066%), and T5 (azoxystrobin 18.2%+ difenoconazole 11.4% SC, 0.010%) all achieved parity with disease control of 26.80, 27.49, and 28.08, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram through ready-mix fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 achieved disease control of 28.08.

Treatment
T5 (azoxystrobin 18.2%+ difenoconazole 11.4% SC, 0.010%)e0
Outcome
disease controle0
Value
28.08e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T1 (carbendazim 12%+ mancozeb 63% WP, 0.066%), T4 (azoxystrobin 18.2% + difenoconazole 11.4% SC, 0.066%), and T5 (azoxystrobin 18.2%+ difenoconazole 11.4% SC, 0.010%) all achieved parity with disease control of 26.80, 27.49, and 28.08, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram through ready-mix fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–166 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control group had maximum disease intensity of 40.44.

Treatment
control groupe0
Outcome
illness intensitye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
40.44e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum illness intensity in the control group was 40.44”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1234 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram through ready-mix fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–166 · show in text ↑

carbendazim · control · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

azoxystrobin · control · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mancozeb · control · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mancozeb · disease · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.