Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Effect of Tillage and Weed Management Practices on Dry Matter, Yield and Nutrient Uptake by Plant and Depletion by Weed in Lentil Crop (Lens culinaris M.)

Devilal Birla; I. B. Pandey; Gajanand; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the impact of tillage and weed management techniques on Plant dry weight, Yield, nutrient uptake by plant and depletion by weed in lentil crop (Lens culinaris M.). Place and Duration of Study: A field study was conducted at Research Farm of Tirhut College of Agriculture, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Bihar, India, from Oct 2020 to Mar 2021. Methodology: The experiment followed a split-plot design with three replications. The main plots consisted of three tillage practices (M1: Zero tillage, M2: Minimum tillage, and M3: Conventional tillage), while subplots included five weed management practices [T1: control, T2: 1 hand weeding at 20 DAS, T3: chlorimuron-ethyl 4 g/ha (pre-emergence) + paddy straw mulching (5.0 t/ha), T4: quizalofop-ethyl 40 g/ha at 20 DAS (post-emergence) and T5: chlorimuron-ethyl 4 g/ha (pre-emergence) + quizalofop-ethyl 40 g/ha at 20 DAS (post-emergence)]. Results: Among the tillage practices conventional found most effective in term of increasing plant dry weight, grain yield, straw yield, nutrient uptake by crop while effectively reduce the weed dry matter and nutrient depletion by the weed. Among the weed management practices hand weeding proved to be the most effective weed management practice, leading to higher plant dry matter, grain yield, straw yield and nutrient uptake by crop and least weed dry matter weight and nutrient depletion by weeds. Among the chemical weeding chlorimuron ethyl (PE) + paddy straw mulching showed comparable effectiveness to hand weeding in all the parameters. These results highlight the importance of tillage practices and effective weed management techniques in optimizing plant growth, yield, nutrient uptake, and weed control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage was the most effective tillage practice in increasing plant dry weight, grain yield and straw yield of lentil.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
conventionale0
Outcome
plant dry weight, grain yield, straw yielde0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“conventional found most effective in term of increasing plant dry weight, grain yield, straw yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage was the most effective tillage practice in increasing nutrient uptake by the lentil crop.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
conventionale0
Outcome
nutrient uptake by crope0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“conventional found most effective in term of increasing plant dry weight, grain yield, straw yield, nutrient uptake by crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1095 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage effectively reduced weed dry matter and nutrient depletion by weeds in lentil.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
conventionale0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed dry matter and nutrient depletion by the weede0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“conventional found most effective in term of increasing plant dry weight, grain yield, straw yield, nutrient uptake by crop while effectively reduce the weed dry matter and nutrient depletion by the weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding was the most effective weed management practice, giving higher plant dry matter, grain yield and straw yield in lentil.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
hand weedinge0
Outcome
plant dry matter, grain yield, straw yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“hand weeding proved to be the most effective weed management practice, leading to higher plant dry matter, grain yield, straw yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding gave higher nutrient uptake by the lentil crop.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
hand weedinge0
Outcome
nutrient uptake by crope0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“hand weeding proved to be the most effective weed management practice, leading to higher plant dry matter, grain yield, straw yield and nutrient uptake by crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding gave the least weed dry matter weight and nutrient depletion by weeds in lentil.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
hand weedinge0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weed dry matter weight and nutrient depletion by weedse0
Direction
leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“hand weeding proved to be the most effective weed management practice, leading to higher plant dry matter, grain yield, straw yield and nutrient uptake by crop and least weed dry matter weight and nutrient depletion by weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1437 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among chemical weeding treatments, chlorimuron ethyl (pre-emergence) plus paddy straw mulching was comparably effective to hand weeding in all parameters.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
chlorimuron ethyl (PE) + paddy straw mulchinge0
Outcome
effectivenesse0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
hand weedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“chlorimuron ethyl (PE) + paddy straw mulching showed comparable effectiveness to hand weeding in all the parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1581 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

47 papers: 36 positive, 11 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

herbicide · weed · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

herbicide · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.