Abstract An experiment was carried out to study the “Effect of different biostimulants on growth, yield and quality of chilli (Capsicum annuum L) under prayagraj agro climatic conditions” during August, 2022 to January 2023 at Horticulture Research Farm, Department of Horticulture, Naini Agriculture Institute, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences. The experiment had eleven treatments replicated thrice in a randomized block design. It was concluded that the application of biostimulants treatments rendered their significant effect on almost all the growth and yield characters as well as quality of chilli. Treatments were given with concentrations of biostimulant products such as Escort @ 1, 1.5, 2 and 2.5 ml per litre, Cheetha @ 2, 2.5 and 3 ml per litre and Baanam @ 2, 2.5 and 3 ml per litre at 45 ,60 and 75 days after transplanting whereas . , , , , , , , , , , , , and and for 50% flowering(56.67 days) . Among the different treatments, (Rs/ha) (2,93,000) , , was also obtained from treatment (T7), .
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18 Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cheetha at 3 ml/l was superior for plant height, with a value of 64.39 cm.
application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l e1 control plants e2 Verbatim
e0 “plant height (64.39 cm) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1040 · show in text ↑ e1 “The treatment T7 i.e. application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l was found superior in terms of ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1016 · show in text ↑ e2 “water was sprayed on control plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–909 · show in text ↑ t0 “chilli ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑ Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cheetha at 3 ml/l was superior for plant spread, with a value of 61.5cm.
application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l e1 control plants e2 Verbatim
e0 “plant spread (61.5cm) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1063 · show in text ↑ e1 “The treatment T7 i.e. application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l was found superior in terms of ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1016 · show in text ↑ e2 “water was sprayed on control plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–909 · show in text ↑ t0 “chilli ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑ Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cheetha at 3 ml/l was superior for number of branches, with a value of 8.11.
application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l e1 number of branches e0 control plants e2 Verbatim
e0 “number of branches (8.11) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1090 · show in text ↑ e1 “The treatment T7 i.e. application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l was found superior in terms of ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1016 · show in text ↑ e2 “water was sprayed on control plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–909 · show in text ↑ t0 “chilli ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑ Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cheetha at 3 ml/l was superior for number of flowers per cluster, with a value of 11.77.
application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l e1 number of flowers per cluster e0 control plants e2 Verbatim
e0 “number of flowers per cluster (11.77) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1129 · show in text ↑ e1 “The treatment T7 i.e. application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l was found superior in terms of ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1016 · show in text ↑ e2 “water was sprayed on control plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–909 · show in text ↑ t0 “chilli ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑ Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cheetha at 3 ml/l was superior for number of fruits per plant, with a value of 79.33.
application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l e1 number of fruits per plant e0 control plants e2 Verbatim
e0 “number of fruits per plant (79.33) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1165 · show in text ↑ e1 “The treatment T7 i.e. application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l was found superior in terms of ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1016 · show in text ↑ e2 “water was sprayed on control plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–909 · show in text ↑ t0 “chilli ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑ Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cheetha at 3 ml/l was superior for fruit length, with a value of 12.77cm.
application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l e1 control plants e2 Verbatim
e0 “fruit length (12.77cm) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1189 · show in text ↑ e1 “The treatment T7 i.e. application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l was found superior in terms of ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1016 · show in text ↑ e2 “water was sprayed on control plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–909 · show in text ↑ t0 “chilli ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑ Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cheetha at 3 ml/l was superior for fruit girth, with a value of 2.47cm.
application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l e1 control plants e2 Verbatim
e0 “fruit girth (2.47cm) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1211 · show in text ↑ e1 “The treatment T7 i.e. application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l was found superior in terms of ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1016 · show in text ↑ e2 “water was sprayed on control plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–909 · show in text ↑ t0 “chilli ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑ Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cheetha at 3 ml/l was superior for fruit weight, with a value of 4.29g.
application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l e1 control plants e2 Verbatim
e0 “fruit weight (4.29g) ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1213–1232 · show in text ↑ e1 “The treatment T7 i.e. application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l was found superior in terms of ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1016 · show in text ↑ e2 “water was sprayed on control plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–909 · show in text ↑ t0 “chilli ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑ Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cheetha at 3 ml/l was superior for fruit yield per plant, with a value of 395.67g.
application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l e1 fruit yield per plant e0 control plants e2 Verbatim
e0 “fruit yield per plant (395.67g) ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1234–1264 · show in text ↑ e1 “The treatment T7 i.e. application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l was found superior in terms of ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1016 · show in text ↑ e2 “water was sprayed on control plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–909 · show in text ↑ t0 “chilli ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑ Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cheetha at 3 ml/l was superior for fruit yield per plot, with a value of 2.37 kg.
application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l e1 fruit yield per plot e0 control plants e2 Verbatim
e0 “fruit yield per plot (2.37 kg) ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1266–1295 · show in text ↑ e1 “The treatment T7 i.e. application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l was found superior in terms of ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1016 · show in text ↑ e2 “water was sprayed on control plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–909 · show in text ↑ t0 “chilli ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑ Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cheetha at 3 ml/l was superior for fruit yield per hectare, with a value of 14.67t/ha.
application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l e1 fruit yield per hectare e0 control plants e2 Verbatim
e0 “fruit yield per hectare (14.67t/ha) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1332 · show in text ↑ e1 “The treatment T7 i.e. application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l was found superior in terms of ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1016 · show in text ↑ e2 “water was sprayed on control plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–909 · show in text ↑ t0 “chilli ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑ Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cheetha at 3 ml/l was superior for Total Soluble Solids (oBrix), with a value of 4.97.
application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l e1 Total Soluble Solids (oBrix) e0 control plants e2 Verbatim
e0 “Total Soluble Solids (oBrix) (4.97) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1369 · show in text ↑ e1 “The treatment T7 i.e. application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l was found superior in terms of ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1016 · show in text ↑ e2 “water was sprayed on control plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–909 · show in text ↑ t0 “chilli ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑ Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cheetha at 3 ml/l was superior for Ascorbic acid content, with a value of 144.67 mg/100g.
application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l e1 Ascorbic acid content e0 control plants e2 Verbatim
e0 “Ascorbic acid content (144.67 mg/100g) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1408 · show in text ↑ e1 “The treatment T7 i.e. application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l was found superior in terms of ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1016 · show in text ↑ e2 “water was sprayed on control plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–909 · show in text ↑ t0 “chilli ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑ Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cheetha at 3 ml/l was superior for days taken for first flowering, with a value of 51.67 days.
application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l e1 days taken for first flowering e0 control plants e2 Verbatim
e0 “minimum days taken for first flowering (51.67 days) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1464 · show in text ↑ e1 “The treatment T7 i.e. application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l was found superior in terms of ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1016 · show in text ↑ e2 “water was sprayed on control plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–909 · show in text ↑ t0 “chilli ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑ Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cheetha at 3 ml/l was superior for 50% flowering, with a value of 56.67 days.
application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l e1 control plants e2 Verbatim
e0 “minimum days taken for first flowering (51.67 days) and for 50% flowering(56.67 days) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1498 · show in text ↑ e1 “The treatment T7 i.e. application of biostimulant product Cheetha @ 3 ml/l was found superior in terms of ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1016 · show in text ↑ e2 “water was sprayed on control plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–909 · show in text ↑ t0 “chilli ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑ Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T7 had the highest Gross return (Rs/ha) at 2,93,000.
Cheetha @ 3 ml/l e1 Gross return (Rs/ha) e0 Verbatim
e0 “Gross return (Rs/ha) (2,93,000) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1575 · show in text ↑ e1 “that is Cheetha @ 3 ml/l ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1697 · show in text ↑ e2 “the highest Gross return ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1556 · show in text ↑ t0 “chilli ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑ Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T7 had the highest Net return (Rs/ha) at 1,67,137.
Cheetha @ 3 ml/l e1 Net return (Rs/ha) e0 Verbatim
e0 “Net return (Rs/ha) (1,67,137) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1577–1606 · show in text ↑ e1 “that is Cheetha @ 3 ml/l ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1697 · show in text ↑ e2 “the highest Gross return ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1556 · show in text ↑ t0 “chilli ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑ Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T7 had the highest benefit cost ratio at 2.32.
Cheetha @ 3 ml/l e1 benefit cost ratio e0 Verbatim
e0 “benefit cost ratio (2.32) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1633 · show in text ↑ e1 “that is Cheetha @ 3 ml/l ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1697 · show in text ↑ e2 “the highest Gross return ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1556 · show in text ↑ t0 “chilli ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑ other · quality: phytochemicals · Capsicum (peppers) Positive and negative results 7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
no effect positive positive 3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers → other · yield · Capsicum (peppers) Positive and negative results 17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
positive positive no effect 13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers → other · quality: sugar starch · Capsicum (peppers) Results agree 3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
positive positive See all 3 papers → other · growth · Capsicum (peppers) Results agree 20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19 papers in the same direction as this paper
positive positive positive 16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers → Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.